• butwhyishischinabook@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    Listen man I know I’m edging pretty close to “no true Scotsman,” but hear me out… it’s not that it wasn’t “true socialism,” but whether something is socialist economically isn’t necessarily tied to authoritarianism. Like, fuck tankies, but also I do think that combining market economics and truly representative democracy with proportional representation and freedom of speech and association with socialist ownership structures (as in the abolition of corporate governance from any input from, frankly, absentee “owners”) is the move. Socialism doesn’t have to be authoritarian, nor does it have to be against market economics. Ya know?

    • arrow74@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 days ago

      I got a death threat from a tankie today because I suggested that Kamala would have not been as bad as the current administration.

      That was fun, don’t worry I was banned shortly thereafter from that community

      • butwhyishischinabook@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        That’s true, but i don’t know if it’s fair to say that mandating employee ownership is anything other than socialist. Not Marxist, sure. Certainly leftist. But isn’t employee ownership and governance of the means of production, by definition, socialism?

    • kreskin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 days ago

      yeah I keep hearing how we’re a democracy but I’ve never felt it ever was. We have the technology to do a direct democracy but no one really wants to do it.