• terry_tibbs@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    As a non American I can’t see a simple solution to the problem, guns are already abundant so banning them won’t magically make them disappear, attempting to sieze them would probably cause a dark stain (ala Boston massacre) in the countries history and you’ve got to deal with the fact that the USA only exists because they had the fire power to make it so which is ingrained in a lot of people.

    I wish there was a magical solution but I fear its a choice between a slow, turbulent transition or a quick, brutal, bloody change.

    • Guest_User@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Really well put. I do often think both sides tend to jump to extremes. But as always, the best solution probably lies somewhere in the middle

    • Franzia@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I would say gun control is worth legislating but its actually not the main issue. The main issue genuinely is the mental health and the structure of society creating powerful and complex emotions in everyone: distrust, apathy, anger that is hard to place. And these emotions are a breeding ground for either radicalizing (left) or making extremist (right) and these white dudes with comversative family backgrounds and turning to far right political beliefs rather than facing these complex feelings.

    • the_q@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      We could certainly stop selling them or ammo, but the powers that be won’t do that

      • rchive@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        If we can’t get rid of drugs, I’m skeptical we could get rid of ammo, either.

        • the_q@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          You’d be surprised how little people need illegal drugs when their basic needs are met, but that’s another convo.

        • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Well, key difference would be that it’s pretty tricky to make ammo in your house, and the demand for ammo isn’t enough to justify the smuggling costs for most of the country.

          It’s kinda like how, despite having issues eradicating drugs, we have successfully inhibited the market for fully automatic weapons, lawn darts, kinder eggs and countless other things that aren’t addictive or at least inebriating.

        • Syndic@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          With a population of 100’s of millions of people, small changes can lead to noticiable improvements. Especially in the medium to long term view.

          There never will be a perfect solution, but there certainly is a lot of room to improve from the current status quo. And that road consists of thousands if not millions of tiny steps.