What does it mean to “open up” an operating system in this context? Do they mean something like the possibility to intall other OSes on their devices, or that the app stores needs to be more open? I’m guessing it does not mean they have to start open source:ing parts of the OS… or?

This isn’t a court of justice, son

this is a court of law

Installed ubuntu on an rpi and firefox there ran snap. Was not very usable. Everything was so slow. Forcing an install of the dep package was the only way to use it. Not very well thought through bu cannonical.

Robocop.

Thought it might be the Matrix, but then I remember that when my parents separated we only had one tape at my moms, Robocop, and no like movie channels. I was rewatching it like crazy.

It’s not even limited to climate. Sweden is heading for some extreme anti free speech where a university banned expressing “any political opinion which could be understood by a passer by.” They had to retract it, but the minister of education were on the side of the university.

You could build more affordable housing if you lowered building standards like demanding there must be a kitchen.

I Sweden a liberal lobby group suggested “build apartments without kitchens” for poor people. It is so fucking dystopian.

Not the person you were replying to, and don’t understand exactly what you mean with port and device id. But if it changes every time, -ish, you plug it in, do you mean like /dev/sdX device names? If so, then maybe look at /dev/disk/by-TYPE/ and use those instead? You have stuff there which is the same each time you plug in.

The small nazi phenomena can be modelled by a perturbative expansion

N = 1 + a¹ + a² + a³ + …

As long as the relative smaller nazi size, represented by ‘a’, is smaller than one the series converges and you are not a nazi. When ‘a’ is larger than one, the smaller nazi in the small nazis is actually bigger, e.g. a² > a, and you are in the nonperturbative regime of the small nazi model, and you’d be called a “full blown nazi”. AdS/CFT postulates you can model the nonperturbative regime with a tankie-description, but the theory is controversial.

I have been forced to use mac now for like a year, and I don’t get the whole “just works” opinion of it. Like I have had so many issues with just basic stuff. Turning off mouse acceleration and the mouse still feels all slimy. Highest mouse speed is so slow and setting it higher requires some crazy tricks, which also does not work consistently through boots. It can’t wake up a lot of monitors, I have to turn them off and on manually. If it cannot connect to a monitor properly but tries, it like disables your keyboard for a few seconds while trying. Some items in the settings menu take a long time to load, as in if I reboot, log in, open settings, there is no mouse settings.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Borgund_Stave_Church seems to still be there

A tensor is something that transform as a tensor. Gtfo Christoffel symbols.

That is why they can be written really neatly in a relativistic formulation, but look fucked up in a classical one.

There is a video linked in the article for context:

https://youtu.be/WiPp9YEBV0Q?t=1529

If I try to interpret the context, it could be C programmers just being negative to Rust because it is not C, that there is a conception of Rust programmers trying to enforce Rust on others, or that Rust programmers will break things.

I’d say arXiv would be piracy in the analogy; free, convinient and supported by contributors. Early netflix would be like researchgate; for profit trash scam site.

I did get paid for reviewing for a Springer journal though. Next to nothing, but it’s not zero.

And sometimes open access costs money for the author too.

Did not want to switch from windows 98 SE to XP, so went with linux instead.

Som anställd har du lojalitetsplikt gentemot arbetsgivaren – även under en uppsägningstid. Se upp så att du inte bryter mot LAS eller lagen om företagshemligheter.

Om du då är illojal, kan det betyda att du bryter mot LAS ( Lagen om anställningsskydd)

So it is a colloquial term for those aspects of LAS and lagen om företagshemligheter. Those quotes from Unionen again. There seems to be aspects (the application of this after your employment ends) also regulated in the collective bargening agreements, and those are not laws, that is true.

“Unionen”. I think they focus a lot on like engineers and bosses, and other upper middle class jobs.

I don’t think the union is really to blame there, “loyalty obligation”, lojalitetsplikt, is afaik a set of laws that really does what Unionen says about it. It’s not the union implementing it.

To be frank, I think its quite a refreshingly honest phrasing they are using. A more company-friendly way would be like “we all like to be teamplayers, and that is what the loyalty obligation is all about”, or something like that. Now it sounds like “you are the guy on the track in the trolly problem meme, get fucked”, and to some degree, fair play to you.