A family says their newborn son nearly bled to death and is fighting for his life after he was circumcised at a New York City hospital.

Tim and Gabrielle Groth said their son, Cole, underwent the circumcision at NewYork-Presbyterian Morgan Stanley Children’s Hospital in Manhattan, where he was born on March 31.

  • ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    It’s ironic because the whole reason I’m even here on lemmy is because I was permabanned from reddit for telling someone to crawl back in their hole because they were defending circumcision while claiming female genital mutilation was abhorrent. As if mutilating a penis is perfectly fine but don’t dare mutilate a vulva.

    I know this isn’t the main topic here but it just reminds me that body shaming men is okay but body shaming women isn’t. Especially when it comes to sex organs.

    • Hacksaw@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Yeah, I love how everyone loves “big dick energy” and “small dick energy”, but if someone said “loose pussy energy” and “tight pussy energy” it’s practically a hate crime lol.

    • Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      9 hours ago

      I feel like your argument loses something by being stated backwards. It (and Hacksaws reply) comes off sounding like you are more angry at women than the patriarchy and want to be able to mutilate and body shame them. Rather than what I hope and assume is the case, that you want all genitals protected from mutilation and shaming.

      • ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        8 hours ago

        I’m just bringing up the double standard. You’re correct in your assumption that I don’t want ANY genitals being mutilated.

        But it’s not patriarchal that circumcision is normalized for aesthetical reasons. Women circumcise their sons because they don’t like uncut penises. I’ve NEVER heard a man say anything like that outside of not wanting their child to feel different because other boys are all circumcised. Women do it for aesthetics. Men do it because of a fear of being different. There’s a difference.

        It shouldn’t be done at all but the idea that uncut penises look gross is inherently a woman thing.

        • Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          7 hours ago

          I’ve never heard a woman say they did or would have their baby boy circumcised because uncircumcised penises are gross, or any other version of aesthetic reasons. The religious reasons are rooted in the patriarchy, as is the “need” to look like one’s father and male relatives.

          In the case of female circumcision, it’s a way of enforcing the position of women as property, making it more apparent if she’s ever had sex so her virginity can be sold to her husband. In its most extreme forms it can require she be cut open in order to give birth, and resewn each time. It can block clumps of menstrual blood and lead to infection and sepsis. In less extreme versions it can prevent her from feeling any pleasure during sex, in order to prevent her from having any except that imposed by her husband.