Those who are mentally well, smart and diligent enough, to know how to effectively locate and kill a CEO are usually also mentally well and smart enough to know better.
Those with the motive rarely have the means, and those with the means rarely have the motive.
Three possibilities immediately come to mind:
a. The accused in the other well-known case was extremely bright, had access to the best education, while this person was not and did not.
b. It was a personal grudge but it sounded good plus a glory grab.
c. He’s mentally unwell and/or overindulged, while also not being extremely bright.
Disclaimer; I’m a random on the internet and this is wild speculation, so none of those could apply.
Those who are mentally well, smart and diligent enough, to know how to effectively locate and kill a CEO are usually also mentally well and smart enough to know better.
Those with the motive rarely have the means, and those with the means rarely have the motive.
Not killing a CEO is better?
Know better than to commit murder. There are some pretty major consequences if you’re convicted.
There are consequences to not killing a CEO now and then too.