I absolutely love wiki walking through random obscure fan wikis, but I hate how most are on Fandom.

I think a federated wiki solution makes sense. I could see it as an evolution of the interwiki concept.

  • EarlGrey@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 days ago

    What benefit would federating it bring?

    The ability to self-host your own FOSS wiki already exists and has for over two decades. It’s called MediaWiki.

    You could have federated accounts I guess but do editors on the Doctor Who wiki really need the ability to see posts on Mastadon or edit pages on the That 70’s Wiki?

    • early_riser@lemmy.radioOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      In addition to discoverability, I’d say it provides a happy medium between letting every rando with an IP address edit a page and requiring account creation. Part of the point of the fediverse is to have (almost) everything in one place under a single account while still keeping things decentralized.

      • EarlGrey@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Can you elaborate on “discoverability”? Finding individual subject wikis has never been a particular problem for me. Even ones that don’t use Fandom, provided they are at least active. Just googling “<insert subject> wikia” (I know. I can’t let it go) always gets me what I need.

        Can’t say I see an advantage to universal accounts (I see more disadvantages), but if that’s the big selling point and people really want it. I’m not opposed to having it, i’ve just always treated it as a mild novelty I never use.

        As for decentralization, it has already been solved by MediaWiki. Which is GPL and (can be) self-hosted.

        • early_riser@lemmy.radioOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          On Lemmy you can see (and search) a list of all the activity from every instance federated to your home instance. Looking at Ibis, which a few posters have mentioned on this thread, it has a discover page with a list of federated instances and articles on those instances. The current format is hardly scalable, but it’s a start.

          But, as I said before, the issue is less about discoverability and more about editing. Just like I can post in this thread even though I’m on a different instance, you can edit an article on one instance even though you’re on another. The alternative as used by Wikipedia, is to allow anyone, account or not, to edit. Requiring someone to have an account on a federated instance would mitigate a fair amount of spam and ease moderation.

          • EarlGrey@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            Requiring someone to have an account on a federated instance would mitigate a fair amount of spam and ease moderation.

            What would that solve that mandating accounts for a standard wiki wouldn’t?

    • Mubelotix@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Discovery. The current state of google dooms such small wikis. They will have zero traffic. Google has been overtaken by AI slop, so if we want to be relevant, we have no choice but to federate

    • jabeez@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 days ago

      Hubzilla is pretty amazing and has a ton of potential, unfortunately hasn’t really taken off at all.

  • Binzy_Boi@feddit.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    3 days ago

    It’s not federated by any means, but if you want to replace FANDOM wikis with other equivalents, Indie Wiki Buddy is a great extension to have on hand.

    https://getindie.wiki

    There’s options to remove FANDOM from search results in favour of other options, and they also allow you to redirect to the Breezewiki frontend for FANDOM to get rid of all those shitty ads and UI, which is legal considering the contents of FANDOM pages are still under the Commons.

  • schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    3 days ago

    I’ve had this thought before, but have also wondered whether it’s even possible to implement this using ActivityPub, considering that a wiki inherently requires having the same state everywhere, but ActivityPub allows instances to ban and defederate how they like (thus become desynchronized from each other).

  • Dark Arc@social.packetloss.gg
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 days ago

    Yeah, that could definitely be cool.

    Cost would be a big factor … Fandom got big by being free and eventually replaced (or heavily customized) mediawiki to the point it’s unrecognizable.

    • Sonalder@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      Hosting a wiki isn’t that expensive it’s basically texts and some lightweight pictures. The whole english wikipedia is around 109GB of data.

        • Sonalder@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          Well, with Kiwix I was able to download the whole english wikipedia with mid-res pictures on my 128GB USB Drive. I think the 600TB you’re talking about includes videos and high-res pictures.

  • solrize@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    I used gitit for a while. It’s git backed and you can propagate it around that way.