No we dont have any benchmarking infrastructure. Maybe one of the instance admins will report some results later.

Sorry I said it wrong, reports do federate but only in a limited way. Particularly if you moderate a remote community you wont see the reports. Also the action of resolving a report is currently not federated at all. Both of these are fixed with the PR above.

This sounds like the same problem you reported before. Only thing I can think of is to get in contact with the maintainer of lemmy-cross-toolchains

I implemented reports federation recently, in current versions it is not available at all. So you may have to wait until version 1.0, though @MrKaplan mentioned that he plans to backport it to 0.19.x

Edit: Nevermind I was talking nonsense. Reports do federate, but only in a limited way. Particularly if you moderate a remote community you wont see the reports. Also the action of resolving a report is currently not federated at all. Both of these are fixed with the PR above.

Yes we renamed it.

I havent noticed any problems with instability, at least for web server development it is stable enough. But it may be different in other contexts like embedded. And its true that many libraries still have 0.x versions.

Yes the current api v3 is also available in 1.0 alpha

What feature requests will be implemented after 1.0? Everything that’s open on the issue tracker really, as soon as someone works on it.

??? Rust 1.0 was released 10 years ago and since then there have been no breaking changes.

https://blog.rust-lang.org/2015/05/15/Rust-1.0.html

We use !community_requests@lemmy.ml to assign new moderators. But redirecting the community to a different instance sounds wrong, because it is by far the biggest datahoarder community with 7k subscribers (compared to 360 on .world).

To see everything you need to select all languages (click at top of the list, then shift + click at the bottom). I believe if you select only undetermined you wont see posts with a language specified, but not totally sure.

The final api version would probably be in 1.0-beta.0, which will still take a few months. But at this time you can already start to adapt for the major changes like combined endpoints, and give feedback if anything else in the api needs changing.

Yes we always release backend and frontend versions together.

On the other hand it gives an indication to client developers that such big breaking changes wont be a regular occurence. So they have a reason to upgrade and then keep using 1.0 long-term. I believe that practically all the needed breaking changes are already implemented, and remaining issues are mostly new feature requests which can be added as new api endpoints or parameters.

You can enable multiple languages with ctrl + click. And user blocks might be another reason for missing posts.

Its not really what you are looking for, but you could my project Ibis for this. Its a wiki so instead of separate files you could use multiple markdown code blocks. Instead of a whole new project you could possibly implement gists as a custom frontend which converts to markdown for the backend. Note that the project is still in early development, so neither syntax highlighting nor federation with other platforms are available yet.

Im seeing the same posts in both cases, so its probably related to your account settings. For example user blocks, language settings etc.

I had a look at those communities, the only one which looks out of date is monero.town. And that instance has federation problems with many other instances, as you can see here under “lagging instances”.

cc @admin@monero.town

Mainly SEO spam with text copied from other sites and lots of ads/referral links to make the owner a profit. But after thinking about it more, those would be rather easy to filter based on ad code in the HTML.

A much bigger challenge will be the ranking of search results. When searching for a term and there are 100 pages in the index that contain it, which of these pages should be shown first? Google developed the Pagerank when they started out, so that might be a good starting point to research further.

This sounds like a very interesting idea. I agree that Yacy doesnt work, when I checked it out years ago it was a completely bloated mess. Not sure how viable how your idea is, because Im not familiar with webrings, and not sure how the federation will work. Anyway the main challenge for this project will be to actually give useful search results, both early on when there are very few crawlers, and also later once spammers try to abuse it.