Summary

Brian Thompson, CEO of UnitedHealthcare, was fatally shot in a premeditated attack outside the New York Hilton Midtown before speaking at an investor conference.

The gunman, still at large, fired multiple times, leaving shell casings marked with the words “deny,” “defend,” and “depose.”

Authorities suggest Thompson was targeted but remain unclear on the motive. His wife confirmed prior threats against him.

Analysts speculate a possible vendetta tied to his company. The case raises questions about executive security, as Thompson lacked personal protection despite known risks.

  • Windex007@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    22 days ago

    Obviously there are many plausible scenarios, but one of them scales significantly differently than the others.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      22 days ago

      If there are many plausible scenarios, even if one is the most plausible, it’s silly to assume that’s the one.

      • Windex007@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        21 days ago

        It’s only silly if one misunderstands an assumption to be established fact.

        If I hear hoofbeats, I will assume horses, not zebras.

        If I see Zebras, I’ll say my assumption was wrong. No shame in it. I’m wrong all the fucking time, being right isn’t part of my identity.

        But until then, if someone says “what do figure those hoofbeats are?” I’m not going to say “50/50 horses or zebras”

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          21 days ago

          Assumptions are claimed to be established facts. That’s what an assumption is. You’re making a claim of fact without having the evidence.

          • Windex007@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            21 days ago

            Established facts do come with proof. That’s how they are established to be fact. You’ll notice a suspicious avoidance of the word “fact” in the definition you posted.

              • Windex007@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                21 days ago

                No.

                But if you preface them with qualifiers that means something, no? Are those words meaningless embellishment or are they intended to provide additional meaning, and if so, what?

          • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            21 days ago

            Something taken for granted or accepted as true without proof; a supposition.

            This means it’s being regarded as true for the purposes of a context. “Hypothetical” is another term which would be useful here. But you’re being probably needlessly pedantic about this. I think everyone can agree that there are millions of people his company has harmed who thus have motive to do this, and at the same time other motives are quite possible. Maybe he broke up with the guy who shot him. Maybe he was part of an international zebra smuggling ring. Maybe it was just completely random, but fate just happened to land on someone who really deserved it. Maybe the total lack of accountability in our justice system finally drove someone over the edge.