• Xanthrax@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    All the kids I’ve met are good at navigating UI, regardless of the platform. They know how to use websites well, but they don’t know how they work. This is a generalization, though.

    I actually had a nightmare last night: my boss took me offline while I was making a script, and I think that’s even scarier for younger generations. This is coming from an older Gen Z.

  • IninewCrow@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    342
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    We are the bridge generation.

    We know and saw a world without the internet and we experienced it when it first came to be.

    We saw the first mass produced computers and computer devices which broke often, didn’t work the way we wanted them to, they weren’t fast and they didn’t have much memory in any way. We were the first generation to see all this. Our parents were too old and busy to figure it out but we were young enough to be curious about it all. We also kept wanting to have the newest fastest hardware and software so we had no choice but to either buy, beg or steal these things to get them. We learned to swap parts, add parts, remove parts, install an OS, uninstall the OS, run backups, store data and learn it all on our own because there was no easy internet social media community to help you. Software was constantly changing and we had to keep up by either buying expensive titles or we learned about Linux and open source software or we became digital pirates or both.

    Now the digital landscape has changed. Younger generations prefer handheld devices so to them everything is solid state … they never can imagine changing the RAM, HDD, SSD, CPU, GPU or the PSU or even bothering to learn what those things are. Because everything is built in and no one (or very few) people bother with fixing or tinkering with anything. There are fewer people who learn about software and about how or where to find it, install it, configure it and run it. To new generations who only know the digital world through locked devices, there was less incentive to learn or even have access to know how these things worked.

    We are the bridge generation. We got to see the world without the internet and the world with one. No one before us got to see what we saw, no one after us will experience what we went through. Our civilization dramatically changed during our lifetime and we got a front row seat.

      • Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        4 days ago

        It’s not easy growing up in houses, watching our parents complain about tiny things while cashing huge paychecks… And now they tell us it’s our fault we can’t afford that lifestyle.

        Boomers are real pieces of shit, as a whole. Not all of them, of course… But man, there’s a very real trend.

    • RamblingPanda@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      55
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      The PSU is the only thing you can change easily. I love that everything is USB-C and that I can plug in everything, everywhere.

      But I’m kind of happy everyone uses handhelds, I got really tired fixing everything for my entire family and friends.

      “My printer seems to be defectiv…”

      Entschuldige, ich kann kein Englisch. Muss weg, keine Zeit. Bye!

        • PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          21
          ·
          5 days ago

          My buddy worked tech support for a fairly large facility. They got tired of getting calls for a busted printer, only to walk all the way across the facility to discover it was out of paper. It got to the point that if someone called about a printer, they would wait an hour before responding. If nobody else called within that hour, they assumed the issue was resolved on its own.

          • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            edit-2
            5 days ago

            The part that royally pisses me off is that a roommate used to work for Lexmark. One day he brings home an “all in one” printer, fax, scanner, and something else I am forgetting. Best scanner I have ever seen. No light bar. The thing worked by taking four pictures and digitally meshing them together. When you scanned a document, there was a series of 4 rapid flashes. One Magenta, one Cyan, one Yellow, one White.

            The damn thing was absolutely perfect at digitizing anything you put onto the unit’s scanning glass, but it did have a design issue where the scanning glass wasn’t parallel to the floor, and was instead tilted like a desktop picture frame.

            According to my roommate, that particular design flaw is why they decided to kill the printer, never releasing it to the public. AFAIK they never even tried that scanning tech in any other printer.

        • RobotsLeftHand@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          5 days ago

          In healthcare IT there’s often a person who specializes in just printers. My friend makes a lot of money doing that.

        • Cypher@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          4 days ago

          I once turned down a job solely because they asked too many questions about printers during the interview.

          I won’t be the printer guy! That path leads to depression.

          Oh and cancer. Toner gives you cancer.

      • Soup@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        5 days ago

        It’s like all the old geezers who cum into carbeurators but like, shouldn’t they be happy that fuel-injection is a million times better and more reliable? I work on my own car and I can handle that shit in my driveway easy but these people seem to want more work to do. Yes, Fred, carbs make more sense for dirtbikes but oh my god otherwise shut up.

        As for printers yea what the fuck. They all work differently even within the same company when all they need to do is take the exact same control module, maybe two versions of it, and slap it onto different bodies. But, instead, it’s just a giant fucking mess.

    • Throw_away_migrator@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      The comp for an older generation is cars. Cars saw similar growth and adoption in the 50s-80s. And they had similar growing pains, reliability and maintenance issues were common place. So being able to perform maintenance and having an understanding of how they work was far more wide spread than just hobbyist and professionals.

      As cars advanced the need to perform field maintenance and ad hoc repairs became less required so future generations (on average) became less knowledgeable and skilled at various car repair (and modification) activities, because cars just work now so there’s really no need to worry about learning how to fix minor issues, because they’re just not a common problem.

      • NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        4 days ago

        Case in point: I drive an EV and I don’t think there’s a damn thing I personally can do to fix it other than maybe change a tire. It doesn’t even have a spare and I wouldn’t even know how anyway.

        My god, I’m the iPad kid of cars.

        • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          4 days ago

          There’s a lot you can still do. All the suspension, battery cooler pump, brakes, wheel bearings, a ton of things to do with the electrical system and lights, fuses and relays, window and lock motors, blinker arms and switches, fluid changes, hvac and ac components, the traction motors themselves…generally the only thing hard for a shade tree mechanic is the battery itself. They’re really heavy and hard to remove.

          Now some components are going to be hard to get a hold of because there isn’t any third party companies making replacements, but eventually as need arises, they’ll get made. Until then there’s places like pick n pull where you can go take used parts off used vehicles or buy used and tested components from ebay if the manufacturer won’t sell you something. I bought a new oem hybrid battery just a couple years ago from a Toyota dealership and installed it myself.

      • henfredemars@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        You also can’t wrench on a car anymore in the way you used to. It’s all computerized and you need special software to access and configure parts.

        I can’t replace my airbags without special pairing software that cost tens of thousands of dollars. It’s unlikely that I’ll learn by performing the repair because the tools are no longer available.

        • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          4 days ago

          Eh…that’s still pretty doable. Many things actually got easier for auto work. A $12 bluetooth obdII dongle and a $4 piece of software on your phone will give you most all the trouble codes you need to diagnose problems, and that’s it it doesn’t outright tell you the issue. Almost no car parts are parts paired and thanks to the internet there’s guides that are way better than a Haines manual to show you how to fix things, as well as a dozen different places to order parts from.

          In the past 15 years the only time I’ve used a mechanic was to replace a clutch.

      • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 days ago

        Here I am at 41 and know how to screw with everything. I stayed inquisitive and stayed a tight ass. I think I’ve paid for a professional to do something twice in the past 20 years. I didn’t want to take on the task of replacing a clutch on a front wheel drive suv on the ground in my driveway.

      • Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        The difference is that you don’t need to be car savvy not to get into an accident. But you do need to be tech savvy not to be at risk of cyberthreats.

        Drivers truly don’t need to know how a car works, software is not like that.

        Also, you can get by without a car, whereas most people need at least an email address.

        Edit: I don’t understand the downvotes. Do people think that you need to know about how engines work to drive a car. Or do people don’t think you need to understand file structure to manage excel files?

      • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        5 days ago

        I’m reasonably certain that all four of my housemates, (58 y/o +) don’t have any idea how to close a program either on their laptops, or their phones. Thankfully I’m the only desktop guardian.

      • aimizo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        4 days ago

        My government teacher in 12th grade got hit with an RIAA suit for seeding thousands of hours of music on Kazaa. When she found out that it was “illegal pirating” she deleted the icon off the desktop and thought she was done.

        • precarious_primes@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 days ago

          Defragmenting often to free up some precious megabytes. I felt like the king of the world upgrading from 4 to 20 GB.

          Now I treat a few gigabytes the way I used to treat a few megabytes (like they’re nothing)

    • PlexSheep@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 days ago

      It’s not like your bridge generation is the only one that know how to use a computer. To me it seems that there are a few ‘experts’ in each generation and the others don’t bother learning it. This is pretty normal and called specialization, the thing that civilization allows us to do.

      I grew up with computers, there was no strict need to change OSes or even hardware (of you got prebuilts). Even so, it’s amazing what unrestricted Internet access and an interest in videogames can lead to. And I know a lot of others who either have at least the basic skills, or are studying Computer science together with me.

      Perhaps there are trends in each generation, but acting like it’s just one generation that can do computer things is just wrong.

      • IninewCrow@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 days ago

        Poverty is also a driving force. I’ve never had a lot of money so I had to be creative in order to do a lot of things. I know how to fix repair and even build my own house. I know how to fix and maintain most things with all my vehicles. I know how to build fix and maintain my own computer systems because I could never afford expensive devices or to pay anyone to fix things for me.

        Because I couldn’t afford much, I’ve instead had to spend most of my time doing things myself.

    • jawa21@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 days ago

      I’ve said it before, and I’ll say it again: Learning to edit config.sys to get some share ware game working without help was a rite of passage for many.

    • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      I’m not sure what the generation breakdown is. I’m in my 50’s and fix PCs. My brother in law is in his 70’s and fixes PCs. One of his 3 daughters (40) fixes her own PC.

      It seems like it’s everyone between 40-80.

      • shalafi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        5 days ago

        GenX is what the comment is about. Millennials were born to home computers but the early ones had to contend with much the same mess we did.

        • Cypher@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          4 days ago

          Millennials were born to home computers

          The majority of Millennials probably first got a PC in the home in their tween/teen years.

        • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 days ago

          Early millennials are definitely thrown in there and remember “before the internet and cell phones” where a thing. I was flipping dip switches on my motherboard to make my swapped out components work. My first pc I got a hold of ran on dos and 5 1/4 floppies. Teens of the 90"s are probably the most pc tech literate ones.

        • Kadaj21@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 days ago

          Yeah, early millennial and OPs comment fits to a “T” for me, though I think some of my experiences had a bit more socialization in context, like ICQ, Aol chat, and MSN messenger. The rise of cell phones, text messages, T9, etc. My kids are amazed when I pull out the VHS tapes at my parents, or my dad pulls out some cassettes or vinyls (though those have been more popular of late).

      • IninewCrow@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        5 days ago

        I think your family are tinkerers, and they are a rare breed. A group of people who just love taking things apart, bringing them back together and doing all sorts of other things with them. My family is a bit like that but we never had the technical expertise. I’m indigenous from northern Ontario and a lot of my cousins and relations have a grade school education but there is a whole lot of excellent small engine mechanics. I have one cousin who barely spoke any English but her regularly swapped while engines from trucks to keep old vehicles running.

        I tinker myself which is why I learned about computers and computer technology on my own but never to a really high level.

        So every generation has their outliers and your family were probably the same group of people that made things or fixed things in earlier generations.

  • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    137
    ·
    4 days ago

    Yes. We are.

    We are young with to have learned tech at an early age, but old enough that the tech wasn’t user friendly when we were kids, so we needed to understand it better than people do in the smartphone generation.

    Installing a new game on my PC in high school was a multi-hour, sometimes multi-day ordeal.

    Plugging in a secondary hard drive involved putting jumpers on pins to keep the system from trying to boot off it.

    Assigning ports on peripherals involved understanding how to count in binary so you could assign addresses on dip switches.

    Installing a printer involved unholy alliances with formless beings.

    Every 2-3 years, I still wake up wearing black robes in a strange room in Romania, blood on my hands and a lingering scent of cordite in the air. I’m fairly certain that’s related to the Canon BJC driver issues I had upgrading my AST to Windows 95.

    • SupraMario@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      4 days ago

      Random BSOD from changing… absolutely fucking nothing, then spending 2 days trying to recover, before saying fuck it and reinstalling windows, so you can play WC1 or D1…good old days.

      Also printers can suck it. 20 years ago maintaining a fucking print server was bullshit… I’d rather deal with BES for another 100 years.

      • SynopsisTantilize@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 days ago

        Sometimes I’d put a floppy disk in. It had 1.jpg crushed down to be 256 colors. Pam Anderson.

        For the longest time it would crash windows 95 when I put it in the drive and opened the folder.

        It had a “-” dash in the title…I took that out and no more blue screening.

        Thanks Bill Gates…

      • crank0271@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        I’d rather deal with BES for another 100 years.

        Cool it, Mario… oh, the menus -shivers-

        • SupraMario@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          Lol I might have to take that back…BES was a pile of epic smoldering shit…even the engineers would tell me it was shit. I’m pretty sure I reinstalled that damn thing a thousand times. It was like winning the lottery when the CEO finally wanted and iPhone and then forced the reset of the company to android or iPhone… myself and my junior admin had beers in the office when we got the last user off it and got to shut it down on a Friday. Best day ever.

    • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️@yiffit.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      The hardest thing I remember having to do to install games was if they were DOS games and you have to manually assign all the hardware ports or whatever (I remember one for “IRQ?”) for the game every time you ran it and if you fucked it up, it wouldn’t have a picture or wouldn’t have sound or they would be fucked up.

      Not quite old enough to have actually had to type in the program after buying the game on a book. That would have been rad!

      • Delta_V@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 days ago

        Yeah. I’ve had to return printers that wouldn’t let me install drivers without also agreeing to install spyware.

    • genuineparts@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      I’m fairly certain that’s related to the Canon BJC driver issues I had upgrading my AST to Windows 95.

      I had the biggest flashback right now. I had a Canon BJC 4000 that would only print all the pages if you had two or more empty pages at the end of the document. Never figured that one out, but every so often I open an old Word Doc and find extra empty pages and remember…

    • vithigar@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      4 days ago

      I had a boot floppy I needed to use when I wanted to play Sim City 2000 because my PCs usual configuration didn’t have enough free conventional memory.

      I had another one for Zone66 because its memory management was incompatible with EMM386.

    • hitmyspot@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      4 days ago

      More likely from soundcard settings than printer settings. If you’re channelling, its due to wrong number of channels selected.

      • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        That’s the weird thing. I used Soundblaster cards, and those blackouts were usually preceded by nightmares of an anthropomorphic goat. It was handy because you could make arrangements to feed the dog and stuff.

  • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    4 days ago

    I work in tech.

    My dad was a teacher, his subject was computers, at that time “computers” class was heavily programming. Basic stuff.

    It seems that kids from gen x, and the millennial generation had the timing to learn the tech before it “just works”, so we’re used to figuring it out as we go, because there was no way to look it up on the internet, so we had to.

    The zoomers and younger generations are largely “it just works” users, where all the basics of getting things to just plug and play was a thing. If it didn’t work it was either “incompatible” or broken. So don’t try to make it work, or you’ll be sued for DMCA related violations.

    IMO, there’s a sweet spot, somewhere in the late 70’s or early 80’s to about the early-mid 2000’s when people had to know something about tech to operate it. Anyone with the aptitude for tech, who was born during this time is generally working in tech.

    People born before that are generally the old school pen and paper types, and anyone younger is generally the plug and play digital era.

    If course, everyone is different, so the dates are probably liable to be different depending on the area, and each person may have different motivations, etc.

    My generation (early millennials) are generally known for being the “tech” person to friends/family, and ADHD; at least, as far as I can see, from my little bubble of friends who mostly work in/with tech.

      • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I’ve used most versions of Windows since 3.11 I didn’t bother going backwards because as far as I’m concerned, before 3.11, it was better to use DOS. Since then I’ve used 95, 98, ME, 2000, XP, Vista, 7, 8, 10, and of course 11.

        About the only one I “missed” was NT, and I’m not unhappy about that. My notes are: 3.11 was basically just an application running on DOS, which was fine, but it’s not really improving much. Few applications supported Windows at that point, so there was little reason to have/use it. 95 was hot garbage at launch, and did not improve much over time, however it was such a drastic change from DOS/3.11 that it was the best we could have hoped for at the time. 98 was forgettable, very little improvement over 95; at least until 98 SE came out, adding USB support, which changed a lot of things. ME was fine for the most part, they put to much emphasis on making it look better without making significant improvements beyond that; however, ME was fine and stable after a few service packs.

        XP was the favorite for most, I saw it as Windows 2000 with makeup. That said, the biggest improvement here was the change over to the NT kernel, something we still use today. Windows 2000 was a favorite of mine, it was visually simpler than ME/XP, but all the functionality you needed was there. It was fairly barebones but that allowed for Windows to take a back seat to whatever you were actually using the computer for.

        Vista was hated, but not because it was actually bad. The problem with Vista was that the system requirements to run Windows shot up significantly with Aero. At the same time, Microsoft introduced driver updates for security, so many older devices, built for XP, that were more or less abandoned, never got drivers that met the security constraints added in Vista. Vista also launched around the netbook era, when “a computer for every child” was a thing. The hardware was trending towards less powerful, cheaper chips, while Vista was requiring much more from the hardware, creating a perfect storm of people buying Celeron systems pre-installed with Vista and having a very bad time. Anyone using a Core/Core2/first gen Core I* chip had a lot fewer problems.

        When Windows 7 launched, most people had abandoned Celeron as a product, and most hardware manufacturers were distributing drivers with the extra security needed for Vista (which was also required for 7), so everything went smoothly and 7 became the next favorite. I don’t have any complaints with 7, and I would be happy to keep using Windows 7 if it wasn’t for the fact that it’s abandonware.

        Windows 8 was a solution looking for a problem. This was the era of Android honeycomb, the odd version of Android made exclusively for tablets. Microsoft seemed to think it was a good idea to do the same, however, sales of tablet windows systems are fairly paltry overall, so forcing everyone into a tablet optimized interface proved to be a bad idea, they “fixed” it with 8.1, and nobody cared. I had purchased a Microsoft surface pro 3 at the time, which was pre-installed with Windows 8, and I found that it was fine, but it was both a lackluster tablet, and a fairly bad laptop, it was an inbetween hybrid that was (again) a solution looking for a problem. Despite having one of the “more powerful” pro 3 units (I think I had the second from the top SKU, core i5), it frequently overheated, making it uncomfortable to use as a tablet, and due to thermal throttling, it was not performant as a laptop. It was a nice idea, executed poorly, solving a problem that nobody had.

        10, in my opinion, is the gold standard. At least, until they started loading windows up with spyware. Any tracking, advertising ID garbage, or similar, was basically the worst part of Windows 10, and everything else was essentially a return to form and function for many things. To me it was like an evolution of Windows 2000. Not many frills, and windows mostly fades into the background so you can focus on what you’re trying to accomplish.

        11 is trying to overhaul your experience, and doing so badly. Control panel, apps, and even your right-click menu is being done differently… They’re pushing you to do it the “new” Microsoft way, and so far, I haven’t met anyone that prefers anything that way.

        IMO, 11 is a lot of Microsoft shoving terrible options in your face by default and whispering in your ear “you know you like it like that”

        No, we don’t. Fuck off with your bullshit, fuck “new” teams, fuck “new” Outlook, fuck everything you’re slapping a “new” label on. We don’t want this.

        Windows 11 is the best advertisement for Linux and Mac products so far.

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      3 days ago

      Yup, agree with this.

      And this is why I’m teaching my kids computer stuff. We haven’t gotten too crazy with it, but my kids have built some stuff in Scratch and helped me assemble my PC (they’ll assemble their own) with me explaining what the main bits do. I also intend to do some basic Arduino-type stuff w/ them as well once I get started w/ home automation (have a NAS and some apps, but no sensors or anything cool like that).

      They’ll probably never need that knowledge, but having the ability to reason about a problem using some foundational knowledge should be useful regardless of what they do (i.e. why isn’t this working? I’ll check the wires, run a simpler test, etc).

      • absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        But do they have to set jumpers on the motherboard to choose the processor voltage?

        • smeenz@lemmy.nz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 days ago

          And make sure the IRQs on their sound card and printer don’t conflict ?

          • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 days ago

            They probably never will.

            I don’t think that’s a bad thing. We made it easier, and they’re reaping the benefits of our work.

            The only issue I see is that when it breaks, nobody will know how to fix it, since we’ve abstracted all the complexity away from the users, so they don’t understand the underlying processes that need to work for the thing to function.

            Other than that, it just works.

            • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              13 hours ago

              The only issue I see is that when it breaks

              That’s a pretty big issue, and that’s likely a huge contributor to issues like ewaste. If someone owns a computer and the memory goes bad, they buy a new computer instead of new RAM. Likewise with batteries on phones, capacitors on appliance circuit boards, etc. There’s so much that used to be regularly repairable that could still be repairable if people understood the basics of the tech they use. But when it stops working, the knee-jerk reaction is to replace it, not repair it, esp. when it’s generally cheaper to replace than have a service tech come out (when 50 years ago, many would just repair it themselves using the provided service manual).

              I like to blame manufacturers here, but a large part of me has to acknowledge that a lot of people wouldn’t bother even if they had all the documentation readily available. A little bit of knowledge about how things actually work can go a long way in reducing waste throughout society.

    • CancerMancer@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 days ago

      When I went to install a suite of emulators on the Steam Deck, it was one installer and some light configuration. Installing ROMs involved using an app that automatically digs up the box art and adds console collections to the Steam interface.

      All of this largely just worked.

      As a millenial that was wild. I’ve never trusted things to just work before but a bunch of open-source devs made it happen. That’s what made me realize we live in different times (and why newer generations have no idea how to actually use computers).

    • KinglyWeevil@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      My housemate is completely incapable of installing mods without using a mod manager, so when my subscription to vortex lapsed he wanted my help and I was like, “look… just read the fucking instructions man, odds are it’ll tell you exactly what to do”

    • FinishingDutch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 days ago

      Yep, pretty much this. I grew up with computers. The first one I used was a C64 in school. We got our first family PC in 1996. I was 14 back then.

      If you wanted to do basically anything, you had to figure it out or read an actual manual. We had to fight with drivers and such in order to get any game or device working. It was part of the fun; you had to be nerdy to want to do that.

      Nowadays, even my completely tech illiterate dad can use an iPad to browse, e-mail, stream stuff and connect on social media.

      To be clear: my dad phoned me this morning asking how he could set the time on his digital Casio watch. And he’s using an iPad!! That’s how easy we were able to make tech, so even a toddler can use it.

      I feel very lucky that I grew up with tech and can solve most problems on my own.

      • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Yep. With my dad teaching computers, we always had one in the house. I started on DOS, and I’ve used most versions of Microsoft operating systems since then.

        I’ve built computers, upgraded, modified, tweaked and nerded out over low level settings and optimizations…

        At this point, I can do all of that. I choose to simply buy something off a shelf because I can’t be bothered to do everything that’s needed to get my system working perfectly. Someone else has done the engineering to make their PC’s operate efficiently, so I’ll just let them do the hard work, and pay slightly more for my system so I don’t have to think about it.

        Once the warranty is up, and something goes wrong, I’ll be in there with a multimeter and soldering iron to fix it if I have to…

    • MashedTech@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      110
      ·
      4 days ago

      That’s my biggest gripe to be honest with modern OSs. My files in my folders are organized like I organize my house. I live in and around that. I hate the idea of a “Downloads” and other stuff with “automatically in the cloud backup for this app”. Give me a file to save you stupid app.

      • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        Android has taken away a lot of the manual usage shit when it comes to doing what you want of it on behalf of security protections. Well fuck you, if I want a program to have certain access to things I should be allowed to do it, whether you like it or not. My N20U still can’t have a full and proper root.

      • hitmyspot@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        4 days ago

        I don’t mind that they simplify it. It makes it easier for more users. Its the fact that even advanced users can’t access it. Not a problem with a perfect app on a perfect operating system with perfect interoperability. None of those exist.

      • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 days ago

        A colleague was trying to share a 365 file with me last week. I didn’t have permission to open it. I was begging them to just save a “physical” copy to disk and email it to me. I hate the cloud.

        • MashedTech@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          Genuinely, Microsoft onedrive/365 share sucks ass. It just does. I got 365 Family since my family doesn’t know how to use anything else besides office apps so I just got the subscription that also gives you onedrive. So, I’ve been using that cloud storage if it’s available and god dammit, why is it so hard to share, find and search files in there.

    • ameancow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      Kids? Try being a manager trying to hire for entry level data work.

      I got maybe one out of five people who even knew how to do basic things like opening windows explorer and navigating through folders. And from that slim margin, finding someone who actually knows how to use software like excel or outlook or word, it makes me want to reword the listing to say that we need people with 5 five years experience. For entry level.

      I have become that which we hate. I am demanding experience for entry level work, simply because the entry-level work pool has zero knowledge how things work. You have spent all your time browsing and none of your time challenging yourselves to install software yourself, to copy and move files, or tried even opening your “settings” panel to adjust things. When I started working a lifetime ago, I took some free lessons in learning how to navigate excel and other popular programs. Using that TINY bit of training, I went on to make formulas and automated several of the systems at my first job. I went from counting screws in the warehouse to an eventual VP position.

      You can get much, much further ahead of the curve if you actually try to learn a little more about the things you use every day, and you will grow your opportunities more than you can imagine.

      • Croquette@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        4 days ago

        “Get off my lawn kids. And god forbid we train people.”

        The common man won’t go out of their way to learn a software they don’t even know they will use. Why is it somehow worst for young people?

        The personal computer as we grew up with is long gone, but somehow, companies and hiring managers expect everyone to be like it is still the case.

        And let’s be real, the vast majority of people don’t know how to use excel even if they work with it every day. For them, it’s a database with a UI and a chart module.

        So yeah, ask for 5 years experience for an entry level data entry position, that’ll fix it for you.

        • taladar@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          4 days ago

          As someone in the generation mentioned in the OP meme I can confirm, most people in my generation don’t know how to use Excel either, didn’t know it when we were younger and that is mostly because it is largely used in professional settings for a narrow range of jobs for its actual purpose and everyone else in a slightly wider range of jobs would be better off using a web app with an actual database.

        • Aceticon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          I’ve met software developers who didn’t know how to use Excel properly (in the sense of not even knowing they could use formulas).

          I think that’s very much for the reason you state: they “won’t go out of their way to learn a software they don’t even know they will use”.

          It’s not just a “common man” thing, it’s an everybody thing - there’s just too much stuff and not enough time to learn it all, so even software developers might never find themselves in a situation were they have to understand Excel enough to know such simple things as how to use functions in the cells, how to use references to other cells or how to make some references be relative to a cell’s position and other absolute.

          Mind you, they’ll probably learn it way faster than “common” people simply because so much of its advanced usage follows “programmer logic”, but that still requires them to be forced to actually use it long enough and often enough that they put the effort into learning it.

      • RangerJosie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        4 days ago

        Well I’m your man! Been using Windows since I stopped using DOS. I meet every requirement you’ve listed here for the job you’ve described and then some. And not one of your peers will give me a call back. Not one.

        If nothing else, gimme some pointers about how to make it thru your ATS. If i can get human eyes I can get hired. Problem is getting that far.

      • Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        I am demanding experience for entry level work, simply because the entry-level work pool has zero knowledge how things work.

        And they don’t need to, that’s not what entry level means.

        If a skill isn’t needed in day to day life anymore and is needed for the job you’re putting out, it’s no longer a common knowledge skill.

        When the talent pool changes, so should expectations.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      Kids aren’t well organized and file structures take time and practice to understand. No idea why anyone would assume a 10 year old who has been using a computer for maybe two or three years would be as experienced as a 30 year old who’d been doing the work for over 20.

      Also, no shortage of Millennials who don’t know how computers work. I deal with them every day.

      • __Lost__@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        4 days ago

        Android is atrocious with this. Windows can be pretty annoying as well, saving things but you have no idea where it is.

        • yonder@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          4 days ago

          Honestly, I find the most frustrating part about file management on android is how terrible the AOSP file manager and most other files managers are. They simply do not make sense. For some reason, someone thought it would be a good idea to make the big button called “pictures” show you images regardless of where they are located instead of being a shortcut to the “pictures” directory.

        • TachyonTele@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          4 days ago

          Other than dumping files into documents and apps, windows is very open.

          Android isn’t a PC OS.

          • Zerthax@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            19
            ·
            4 days ago

            It’s sad that they keep trying to make PCs more like phones. I want phones to be more like PCs.

          • azuth@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            Nobody said PC, Android is a computer operating system.

            Smartphones are computers that occasionally make phone calls.

              • azuth@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                3 days ago

                No, you edited your post around 19 hours later to add “PC”. Honesty is not your strong point is it?

                • TachyonTele@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  3 days ago

                  Yup I did change it. If I had kept it as “computer” that’s what you would have cried about. Even though it’s obvious computer means PC.

                  When people talk about smartphones they either call it that, or they say android/iOS

  • Apytele@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    56
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    As a millenial nurse watching gen z new grads hunt and peck with their index fingers to write a shift note, 100%. I don’t think my parents really appreciated how much constantly being on AIM with my friends as a tween actually really benefited my typing skills in a way that’s been much more valuable to my career than algebra.

    All the math you need to be a nurse is ratio / proportion and kitchen measurements to track I/O. With a modern EMR system (electronic medical record) that does most of the math for you you don’t even need that. The rest is latin and greek root words for various body parts and fluids and a vague understanding of how they’re all related (hyper-tension in the cerebral is bad because the cerebral is surrounded by a bone case and bones no stretch. That means the cerebral pops out of the bone holes and once it’s done that it does NOT go back in correctly like a squeezy ball toy). That gets you through the board exams.

    After a year or two in practice you’ve just seen the same shit with a millimeter of difference over and over and over that you either know what to do about it or who to call to do something about it. And when shit is about to go REALLY wrong that’s also happened enough times that you get a weird feeling and just start calling everybody because your psych patient has been trying to kill you for the past week and an hour ago they suddenly stopped trying to kill you and now you have to explain to an RRT nurse (rental ICU nurse) why you’re upset that the patient isn’t trying to kill you.

    • Aceticon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      Gotta love it when you come into a bit of a bitch & moan article about Tech and end up learning something new about Human Physiology and Medicine.

      Cheers for that!

      • Apytele@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        Another fun fact: the psychiatric term for my speech pattern (well, typing, but they’re both revealing of thought content), is “tangential!” It can be indicative of mania or psychosis but in this case it’s just ADHD so bad the neuropsychiatrist thought I was faking for drugs. They said my recent memory tests like I have dementia (sort of, mostly the rote part when they ask if you remember the random words they told you at the beginning). I’m really good at a bunch of the hands-on stuff but the EMR really saves my bacon on remembering everything.

        • Aceticon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          Well, if I understood it correctly, my mother is very much like that (for example: it’s very hard to keep her on track to get to the end of a story without her getting lost of some lateral explanation about an explanation about a relativelly unimportant detail in the main story) and even I tended to work like that in the past (not so much nowadays), so your whole post for me was easy peasy to follow and a satisfying learning experience because it went into all sorts of interesting places :)

          Judging by the upvotes from others, I would say I’m far from the only one.

          It probably helps that here and in this post you’re basically talking about complex and interesting things to a pool of people with lots of above average intelligence, Education and/or curiosity ones.

  • Snapz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    140
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 days ago

    iOS is literally designed for toddlers to be able to use it. “iPad kids” aren’t especially gifted, “iPad adults” are especially stupid.

    But on the bright side, those same groups think they “know computers” because they can press large, brightly colored buttons - so they walk around with unearned confidence in their abilities and impatience/lack of appreciation for the people that actually have to fix things.

    It’s also why a large swatch of these same fucking idiot, drains on humanity loudly challenge the validity of voting tech infrastructure without any factual basis to their argument - they just “feel” like they get it.

    • JoeBigelow@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      90
      ·
      4 days ago

      My boss very confidently proclaimed that all serious IT professionals use a Mac. Said Linux “is for programmers and nerds”

        • sploosh@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          IT professionals are more the folks that install and maintain large scale computer systems and networks, like a company’s IT department or MSP. Programming is closer to engineering. Software engineering.

          • Aceticon@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            4 days ago

            If they work professionally in IT, then they’re by definition “IT Professionals”.

            Absolutelly, the definition of “IT Professional” starts at lower (or maybe the correct term would be “more generic, maintenance-oriented and less specialized”) levels of domain expertise than “Software Developer” and most people out there’s contact with an “IT Professional” won’t include a software developer (even in the average business, which is unlikely to directly use Programmers but will almost certainly use the services of System Administrators and Network Engineers), but saying they’re not IT Professionals would be a bit like saying that the people who design cars aren’t Auto Industry Professionals, only Car Mechanics are.

            Mind you, I don’t disagree that Programming is closer to Engineering: my point is that Engineering IT Systems is still a profession in IT, just like car design (in the technical sense) is both an Engineering practice and a profession in the Auto Industry.

      • Sabata@ani.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        35
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        As an IT professional, Macs are used by people that couldn’t figure out Windows. Linux is for people that understand enough about Windows to live in constant fear of the next newsworthy workday.

        • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 days ago

          As an IT professional that uses a Mac and runs multiple Linux boxes, Windows is for people who don’t know about computers. MacOS and Linux are for people who do. Some Windows people should be the other two, but live on Windows because they’ve learned enough to deal with it.

        • bestboyfriendintheworld@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          4 days ago

          Macs are for people who want a high performance laptop with great battery life and build quality. Hardware and driver issues are extremely rare. An out of the box Unix environment and great desktop applications for everything round it out. Macs are for people who want a to get actual work done and not lose time babysitting or tinkering with their computer.

          Windows usability has become worse since 7 and it’s now filled with crap and ads. The different settings applications are an embarrassment and insult to users.

          couldn’t figure out windows

          Decided their time is too valuable to spend it on dealing with Windows‘ bullshit.

        • atx_aquarian@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 days ago

          Ha! I totally agree! But I also can’t resist defending Mac a little bit.

          Maybe I’m just weird, but I grew up on Commodore, then DOS + Windows, then Windows (when it became all-in-one and not just a GUI shell over DOS). I got into Linux desktops and servers in college and will only ever do a server on Linux, of course. Throughout all of this, both software consumption and development have been constants for me.

          Right now, I greatly prefer MacBooks for productivity, and I have been keeping a Windows PC going for flight simming, though I’m tempted to switch that to Linux ever since MS declared it too old to run Windows even though it’s still perfectly capable of doing everything I care about–MS just insists on “trusted platform” hardware now.

          Anyways, the point I’m going for is that Mac is also for nerds, especially ones who understand Windows and Linux and just enjoy a nice workstation that combines the best of both worlds. Windows is trying to catch up with WSL, but it’s still a bolt-on, whereas Mac is BSD under the hood. I’ve been hearing about nice Linux laptop options and hope it will get to an equally nice experience, but, for now, Mac, for me, is like a new car. Sure, I used to do my own maintenance and some repairs on my old cars, but now I have a job and can pay for something that usually just works, that allows me plenty of ways to tinker, and that I can pay to have fixed when I don’t want to spend my time grinding on something unfulfilling.

          • Aceticon@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            4 days ago

            IMHO,

            Windows has completelly stopped its trend of becoming less shit over time and has actually started going backwards.

            Modern Macs (having used both, I would say they aren’t really direct descendants of the original Macs but rather they’re major redesigns) already started at a point when usuability could be done better, kept improving for longer and, even though they stopped improving in terms of usability, unlike Windows they haven’t gone back.

            Linux is the only one that still keeps on improving (though usuability-wise it started ever further back than Windows), though slower than the others and often in a two-steps-forward-and-one-back fashion, so it’s about to go past Windows (one might stay that it has already done so in usability and is only the large number of Windows-only applications that keeps Windows ahead) and hopefully will eventually pass Macs too.

            Whilst what I expect for Linux has a big dollop of hopefulness, for the rest I think it’s pretty obvious that Windows has never surpassed Macs in terms of usability and will never do.

          • Sabata@ani.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            4 days ago

            the point I’m going for is that Mac is also for nerds,

            Don’t you find them extremely restrictive and hard to repair? I know they want the walled garden, and absolutely don’t want anyone opening up a Mac/iphone and changing hardware other than a Apple tech. That removes all the fun from tinkering with and customizing your stuff.

            • atx_aquarian@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              7 hours ago

              Fair point! I don’t know what I’ll do whenever I eventually have to replace mine. I was lucky (I guess) to get the last model that had a removable drive and the keyboard I ended up loving. I upgraded my storage to 2 gigs and felt that covered everything I cared to change on this one.

              But I’ll have to seriously reconsider on future models, as I am enticed by the newer Apple chips but have certainly heard the uproar about the relatively small amount of ram offered. And now that we’re on the subject, I’m not thrilled about the idea of Apple dropping OS support (i.e., security updates) for older models. I want to upgrade when I’m ready for an overhaul in performance, not just because they want to sell more.

              I guess I need to be more specific about “nerd.” I find it great for software nerdiness, but I have to admit the only physical use case nowadays is plebian: “just take my money and make it work.”

      • StuffYouFear@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        32
        ·
        4 days ago

        I’m in IT, from my experience, most people who use Macs either use it for media, because it is easy to use for the common man, or it is the most expensive option.

        • taladar@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          19
          ·
          4 days ago

          Also most people who use Macs need help from their Linux using coworkers to get anything moderately difficult done on their systems.

        • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          4 days ago

          I’ve been in IT for over 20 years the most of the people who use Macs do so because there’s supported business software written for it while still being Unix under the hood.

          • Aceticon@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            4 days ago

            I too been in IT for over 20 years and most people I’ve seen using Macs were Graphics Designers and Marketing types.

            I’ve seen but a handfull of IT Professionals using them and I’ve seen significantly more IT Professionals using Linux for work than Macs.

            My experience covers a couple of countries and various industries since I’ve worked as a contractor (a kind of Freelancer) for most of the time so moved around a lot more than people working as permanent employees would.

            Maybe one or two people I’ve seen using Macs cared about it being Unix under the hood and I think all of those were the above mentioned IT Professionals who used Macs.

            People doing Graphics Design and other such digital media work (which is how Marketing types commonly ended up using it) really loved them because they were easy to use, had proper color calibration together with really great quality high resolution screens (the first properly supported 4K computer screens were Mac), plus the whole Adobe Suite as well as pretty much all other top professional design and media work software has full native Mac versions. These people were, however, not computer experts in the IT Professional sense of the word (even the Graphics Designers working on Tech Startups were tech users, not tech experts) and did not at all value the “Unix under the hood” characteristic of Macs.

            • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 days ago

              Mine was mainly at startups that did big data and open source software, and the only folks in the org who used Windows were generally the accountants.

              • Aceticon@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                3 days ago

                Yeah, during my period in Tech Startups I did see a bit more of usage of Macs than in other places (such as Finance, Software Products, Software Consultancy and even Publishing), but always felt it was driven by the whole halo of “fashionability” around Apple Products, which isn’t really a rational reason.

                In my experience Mac use is also more likely in people doing Frontend work than Server-side work, maybe because the latter is not at all about visuals and most server-side work targets Linux so it’s way simpler to just have Linux in your workstation.

                Then again I’ve been using Linux since the 90s so maybe I’m biased ;)

                • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  3 days ago

                  A big study by IBM showed that Mac users are more productive and cost less to support than Windows. A company won’t buy things for their foot soldiers that is “fasionable” like they will for the execs. But they’ll definitely do it if it means they need to hire fewer IT support staff.

                  In my experience the backend guys are more likely to use Linux compared to other folks, but a lot of them still used a Mac because they didn’t need to do a bunch of work to get Zoom or Teams working.

      • nzeayn@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        4 days ago

        people like your boss are awesome. managing their macs pays so stupid well, it feeds my linux home sever upgrade habit.

      • oo1@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        He’s not wrong. There is a lot more money in selling hype and style, than functionality and substance. Pro’s need pay.

      • SquiffSquiff@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        4 days ago

        So what do they make of people like me who who use Linux on a Mac, with e.g. Colima or Rancher desktop - doing cloud/kubernetes/python development? I moved to a Mac a couple of years ago after 20 years of using Linux as my daily driver because frankly Bluetooth audio on Linux sucks and because I was tired of getting endless different video conference / screensharing solutions working at short notice for interviewing.

    • TheRealKuni@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      ”iPad adults” are especially stupid.

      Does this mean a specific type of adult, or adults who use iPads? Cause…I consider myself pretty technically gifted, I’m a software developer, previously worked IT…and I love my iPad (for the things it’s good for).

      • meathorse@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        35
        ·
        4 days ago

        Not OP but I suspect they mean adults that struggle with normal technology but thrive on ipads (can remember the button they use to open sodoku)

        Nothing at all wrong with making technology easy to use for the masses, but this can create problems.

        • Aceticon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          Even the “problems” are only really a problem for those who value understanding how Tech works and hence see a lack of it as a problem (welcome to Lemmy!).

          I’m not so sure that, in the greater scheme of things, not understanding the innards of Tech is a “problem” anymore than not knowing how to fix your own car is a “problem”.

          The only way I can see that it might be a problem in a more general sense of the word is if that’s helping enabling enshittification because people don’t understand Tech enough to be able to avoid or more away from enshittified options.

      • NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 days ago

        I like the size and heft of the ipad - I never sit at a desk with a computer anymore outside of work, and feel like I thoroughly earned the right to that. But as a productivity device it feels like a straitjacket.

        • Love my iPad for making art with Procreate, reading, playing media, as a universal remote for home automation, games, showing photos to friends, looking up stuff of the internet, reading, for DJing.

          There are no messengers, calendars, or communication apps configured on it. So there are no notifications.

          I sometimes try it for productivity, but run into limitations quickly. It’s okay for editing a document for a bit, but managing files is already torture.

  • rozodru@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    4 days ago

    My dad can write DOS commands better than most people my age can and I work in Tech. beyond that? he’s clueless. Younger generations can either type with their thumbs or their index fingers and know absolutely nothing about how things work. If it’s an app they can open on their phones or tablet devices then perfect, they’re all over it. Beyond that? no way.

    People my age and from my generation can type well, can figure things out and fix issues on computers, and know our way around tech. Why? cause we were raised in an age where things were essentially “kicking off”. I was taught typing in high school. Beyond that most of us used AIM, ICQ, MSN Messenger, mIRC, etc so if we weren’t taught it in high school we learned it that way.

    We learned html, php, javascript, etc via Geocities, setting up PHP messageboards, hell even just customizing our Myspace page. younger generations don’t have anything like that so they don’t know it. We learned it in our free time to customize our online experience. We had daily consistent shows like The ScreenSavers or Call for Help to teach us how to use Windows or even introduce us to Linux. I learned to build my first PC thanks to Leo Laporte and Patrick Norton. countless magazines and books to pick up to read how to do stuff. And in those days if you wanted to game on PC you pretty much had to build your own PC. No one made prebuilt custom gaming pcs. So you had to learn that stuff.

    Today things are all prebuilt for you. gaming pcs, phones and tablet apps, etc. People today just want things to “just work” and if there’s anything needed beyond opening an app and logining in then they’re not interested. Finding and signing up for instances? forget it.

    • tehmics@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 days ago

      I love Leo and Patrick. I think Leo is still doing The New ScreenSavers and Patrick is off doing an AV podcast last I checked. I miss their shows on rev3 too

    • danafest@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      Ugh I wish you hadn’t reminded me of screensavers. I loved that show! Now I feel old and sad haha

  • PixelProf@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    3 days ago

    I think centralization played a big role in this, at least for software. When messaging meant IRC, AIM, Yahoo, MSN, Xfire, Ventrilo, TeamSpeak, or any number of PHP forums, you had to be able to pick up new software quickly and conceptualized the thing it’s doing separate from the application it’s accomplished with. When they all needed to be installed from different places in different ways you conceptualize the file system and what an executable is to an extent. When every game needs a bit of debugging to get working and a bit of savvy to know when certain computer parts are incompatible, you need a bit of knowledge to do the thing you want to do.

    That said, fewer people did it. I was in highschool when Facebook took off, and the number of people who went from never online to perpetually online skyrocketed.

    I teach computer science, I know it isn’t wholly generational, but I’ve watched the decline over the past decade for the basics. Highschool students were raised on Chromebooks and tablets/phones and a homogenous software scene. Concepts like files, installations, computer components, local storage, compression, settings, keyboard proficiency, toolbars, context menus - these are all barriers for incoming students.

    The big difference, I think, is that way more people (nearly everyone) has some technical proficiency, whereas before it was considered a popular enough hobby but most people were completely inept, but most of students nowadays are not proficient with things past a cursory level. That said, the ones who are technically inclined are extremely technically inclined compared to my era, in larger numbers at least.

    Higher minimum and maximum thresholds, but maybe lower on average.

  • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    It’s worse than that: we’re a small subset of the only generations that know how computers work. The vast majority of my peers would balk at using a command line, much less anything deeper.

    I say generations because it’s obviously not limited to one, but, it sure as fuck isn’t many.

    • jj4211@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      4 days ago

      Yeah, the era of the ‘genius computer wiz kid’ had a small percentage of people working significantly with computers, but they were very obvious. You either knew your way around the computer very well and used it heavily, or just didn’t use a computer if you could help it.

      I remember growing up the other teens would hate being forced to use a computer to type up an assignment, and would ask “can’t I just hand write it?”. We are talking about a percent or two, even among the age group, that would seriously use computers.

      Now every kid uses “computers” constantly, but their level of understanding is about the same as the folks that formerly just wouldn’t bother trying back when the computers demanded you fiddle with TSRs, config.sys, autexec.bat, jumpers, dip switches to get things just right, and just right from application to application (this application demands XMS, this other demands EMS). For most kids of the era, maybe they’d use a computer with a word processing application on it, and otherwise they would play with a game console, which was far less finicky.

      Between computers and navigating the stupid interface of VCRs of the time, you had TV shows pick up on the whiz kid as a meme (Wesley Crusher in TNG, Lucas Wolenczak in SeaQuest, so many sitcoms of the time would have one…). However they weren’t the prolific folks. Most kids of the time didn’t have time for computers (which also commonly showed up in the sitcoms, the cool jock would have the nerd whiz kid pull some stuff for him, because he sure couldn’t be bothered to deal with computers).

  • NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    79
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    It’s funny because we always thought that the next generation’s technical knowledge would utterly eclipse ours, but instead they only know how to edit a short video to seem to loop infinitely.

  • Aceticon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    I suspect that back in the day there was a generation that were “the only ones who knew how cars worked” (in that it had a far higher number of people who could do their own car repairs).

    It’s the product of having grown up in a time when that technology was going from niche to widespread - a time when its still clunky, fickle and needs a lot of babysitting and before it was mainly made “so simple that any idiot can use it” - so if you were one of those people who got into it back then, you were forced to understand it more in depth merely to keep it going. Those who grew up before that simply never became familiar with it, whilst those who grew up later only ever had to understand how to the mature-stage user interfaces of that Tech, which are designed for maximum accessibility with minimum learning curve (which amongst other things means minimizing the need for deep understanding of what’s going on) and did not need to know how to maintain it since “maintenance” had by then become “get a new one and click this button to migrate your info”.

    You can see a similar thing going on with 3D printers: earlier models are fickle and need all sorts of tweaks and understanding of what’s going on to get decent prints out of them plus required frequent maintenance (amongst other things, you quite literally have to periodically retighten the screws of whatever kit FDM printer you got otherwise print quality worsens over time) whilst the later consumer-oriented products make everything simpler.

    • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      I don’t think that’s true, the length of time that cars were simple enough to do most of your own maintenance lasted a long time, from the very first cars through to the 80s or so, until computerisation meant the only real fault finding you could do was swapping parts without specialist equipment.

      • balsoft@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        90s-late 00s cars are actually on repairability in my experience, because they already have computers which help you diagnose failures easily with a $20 OBD2 scanner (this saved my ass a couple of times, when I could almost immediately see the error whenever my car died, fiddle or re-plug the wiring of the failed component and keep going), and they don’t yet have all the over-complicated, designed-to-fail, hard-to-reach crap that a lot of new cars have.

      • Aceticon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 days ago

        I grew up in the 80s and most people around could only ever do the whole “check the oil level and add some more if needed” and the same for the water for the window wipers.

        Granted, nowadays some people can’t even do the latter.

        • odelik@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 days ago

          I too grew up in the in that era. But grew up in the Detroit area where nearly everybody knew something about cars due to how many people worked in the auto industry and how the knowledge was prevelant and shared amongst friends and peers. Auto shops were still a thing, but largely used for jobs nobody wanted to do, didn’t have access to the tools, or didn’t have the time to invest

        • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          It’s true not everyone could do it, but things like checking timing, adjusting carburettors etc is something people can learn from reading a manual or watching a video.

  • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    When I was six years old, my dad brought a computer home from work. It had Windows 3.1 on it. I had to learn how to use the DOS command prompt in order to play my favorite game, Q-bert. When I was a teenager, a new computer of middling quality could run north of $3000 from the Best Buy. But my friends introduced me to a catalog where I could buy the parts to assemble one from scratch. They let me borrow their copy of Windows 95 to install. Then we all had to learn how to use dial-up in order to connect to the internet, or how to build out a LAN network to play games together in person. We took classes in touch-typing at school, using the computer lab. I went to computer camp during the summer. I went to college and took more advanced classes on programing.

    I have spent tens of thousands of hours learning to use the computer, practically from the inception of the PC to the modern day.

    Now my friends have kids, and I talk about how they use the computer. Everything is out-of-the-box. Installing something is as simply as clicking an icon. You can buy a mini-computer off the shelf for under $200 and it runs better than anything I could have built thirty years ago. Periodically, they will come to me with a more advanced computer program, which has to do with a very particular OS configuration or some weird networking bug that only someone with 10+ years of experience would think to look for. I typically find the answer online, because I don’t remember it off the top of my head. I teach the kid and the kid learns, and then the kid knows as much as I do on that particular subject.

    In twenty years, I’m sure they’ll know more than me, just because I’ll be retired and they’ll be in the thick of it.

    Also, please nobody ask me how a car works. That was something my parents’ generation learned. I’m clueless.

    • Cralder@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      4 days ago

      Since you mentioned cars, here is a theory my coworker told me that I think makes a lot of sense.

      Our parents were the last generation to learn about cars because back then you needed to know how a car worked in order to own one. Cars are too simple now and you couldn’t fix one even if you wanted to since they are so locked-down.

      We are the last generation to learn how computers work since we needed to know how a computer worked in order to use it. Now computers are too simple to use and you couldn’t fix one even if you wanted to since they are so locked-down.

      Obviously not saying nobody today knows how cars or computers work, but it is a lot less common. Anybody who learns about cars or computers today do it because of personal interest, not because of necessity.

      • boonhet@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        Cars are too simple now and you couldn’t fix one even if you wanted to since they are so locked-down.

        Yes, same thing between computing hardware (I’m not gonna say computers, because for a lot of people nowadays, their only device is their smartphone) and cars. It used to be that things were more complicated to use, but easier to repair, so a large percentage of users could also repair their things.

        Nowadays, you don’t even need to know how to check your oil level because the car will tell you if it’s low. You might not even have a dipstick. And with service intervals being 25000km and more, how much are you REALLY saving by doing your own oil change and stuff? I still do it, but

        Similarly - as a kid, I had to fix small issues that popped up with Windows XP ALL the time. Couldn’t connect to any website? Flush the DNS cache. No connectivity at all? ipconfig /release and ipconfig /renew. Mouse stopped working AGAIN? Use the keyboard to navigate to devices, reinstall mouse driver.

        If I was growing up right now, I’d have no idea how things work, because they JUST DO. So you don’t learn a lot anymore. As for cars, I still learned because I grew up poor, so my first car was around 500 euros and I did everything myself.

        • laranis@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 days ago

          Decided on a whim to fix up an old car from the 80s. I was able to tear it down to the frame and reassemble it with not much more than a set of imperial wrenches. That’s a bit of an oversimplification but not much. And while there was a lot that could go wrong there was nothing that was a black box where you could get to a point where if something was wrong you would throw up your hands and say, “Oh, well. Guess this is garbage now!” Different time, I guess.

          • boonhet@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            4 days ago

            Yup, now you spend several hundred on a Chinese clone of whatever factory diagnostics tool allows you to code modules and such. And there are still probably things you can’t touch.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 days ago

        Cars are too simple now and you couldn’t fix one even if you wanted to since they are so locked-down.

        I mean, I’d argue they’re too complex. But I agree, you need so many specialized widgets (many that vary by brand and model) that its impractical to do more than change the oil.

        I was looking at a Model A on display at a dealership when I went car shopping recently. They had the engine open, and I was looking at the thing thinking “If you sent me this in a box as a ‘Build your own car’ kit, I’m pretty sure I could do it”.

        • Cralder@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 days ago

          Sorry I meant simple to use. Repair and maintenance is very complex. You often can not even do some maintenance since you need specialized tools or software that only mechanics have access to.

  • LovableSidekick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Boomer here. As a lifelong software developer I’ve always known more about computers than most people in my age group generally, but I’ve always assumed younger people know more than I do because they’ve grown up with so much more tech. Maybe they tend to be more at user-level with it. I’ve never thought about that.

    • CancerMancer@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      Among other things I am responsible for setting up our users with software, and the young folk are not really any more capable than average boomers with PCs. They don’t understand the file system, basic cables, or even the most basic Windows settings.

      • woodenskewer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        basic cables

        Bless his heart but we had a new guy setting his dock station up a couple years ago now, he tried daisy chaining his monitors display input together to make a dual display set up. We were small talking about our PC setup a little bit before this interaction. This was my moment of “what happened?”

        • CancerMancer@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          I get that sometimes people don’t know exactly how something works and they get confused, like ethernet splitters not allowing you to split the output of one cable to two PCs. Fair enough, people used to cable TV and phone lines might not expect that behaviour.

          What could possibly make you think monitors can be daisy chained? Nothing else in that space works that way either… Though now you’ve got me wondering about USB-C monitors and what kind of unholy hell of client confusion we might be bringing to our doorstep with those.

  • Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    Hey remember when computers become essential to day to day life and schools started making it part of their curriculum? Yeah me neither.

    For gen x and millennials, they got those skills for free cause their toys incentivized them. As in we got that for free.

    It was never guaranteed for that to keep being true. And giving you basic knowledge for the world is usually what schools should do but they never did cause there is money to be made with dumbed down tools.