I’m fairly new and don’t 100% understand it yet, but instances are run on servers that require money. Are we heading towards seeing ads or subscriptions to raise funds instead of relying on donations to cover overhead?

Especially with the influx of new users. Hardware upgrades are needed.

  • fidodo@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    206
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    The fediverse is not a single database or server. It’s a protocol and standard that’s distributed by design. The fediverse as a whole cannot be centrally monetized, just like email can’t be monetized. A single provider could potentially choose to try to monetize either by requiring a subscription or showing ads, exactly like email providers do, but if you ever feel like they’ve stopped providing a good service you can just switch to another instance just like you can switch to another email provider.

    Unlike a centralized service like Reddit, you’re not locked into a monopoly. Switching instances does not lock you out of the system as a whole, just like you can still receive email if you switch to another provider. With Reddit you can only access the platform through Reddit because it’s a closed source centralized monopoly.

    One thing the fediverse seems to lack as far as I can tell is a way to link accounts, like how you can set up forwarding with email, which helps you switch providers. But the protocol and standard is still being developed so maybe that’s something that can happen in the future

  • SmallAlmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    185
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    No ads, no tracking, just donations. The model proved itself when twitter went to shit and a big influx of users came to mastodon, it all worked out.

    • small44@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      75
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Many mastodon instances shut down. There’s always a risk that at some point the donations are not enough to sustain an instance. It could be very problematic if mods lose their communities when an instance shutdown.

      • Moohamin12@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        39
        ·
        1 year ago

        Perhaps what we need is a backup code or some kind of exportable file with all our data (subbed communities, interactions, yadda yadda) which we can port over to a new instance if necessary.

        • Norgur@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          22
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah, especially with Lemmy which is a lot more permanent than Mastodon is. You can screenshot your old toots but you can’t screenshot a userbase. There should be a way to migrate a community to another instance while keeping the subscriptions.

        • Matt@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          Mastodon does this (you can download a full backup of your entire account - although not sure about media) every 7 days, which can be imported into various other Fediverse platform accounts, depending on what they allow.

          I suspect that all Fediverse platforms worth their salt will make this a core feature.

      • SkyNTP@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        You mean promotion. Not all promotion is bad. When a game developper posts a content update about their game, that’s promotion. And I think most subscribers of that community will be pretty happy to see that kind of promotion. It’s opt in.

  • fidodo@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    105
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    The big difference with Lemmy is that it’s not really a service, it’s a open protocol and standard, like email, or http. The service itself is provided by distributed instances that adhere to the protocol. Like those protocols, no one company has been able to get a monopoly on it. Some have taken over a lot of it, like Google with Gmail, or cloudflare, but if you don’t want to work with them there are a ton of other options you can go with, and you will not be locked out of the system if you do.

    Reddit was a centralized closed source system so if you don’t have a Reddit account then you are locked out of the system completely.

    Lemmy is decentralized so no one instance has or can gain a monopoly. If you want to break ties with one instance you can just switch to another one and still participate with it and the rest of the fediverse.

    Not only does that give you choice in a worst case scenario, it also keeps all the instances on their toes because they don’t have dictatorial control over their users.

    Spez’s fatal miscalculation was that he thought he had user lock in, but unlike other social networks where it’s your only option to keep in contact with your real life friends, or it’s the only platform your favorite creator posts on, they had neither. Almost all accounts were not connected to your real life and posts were mostly links to other platforms. Very few creators had Reddit as their sole posting platform. The interactions were ephemeral and superficial. Dropping Reddit was the easiest service I ever had to drop.

  • HSL@wayfarershaven.eu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    95
    ·
    1 year ago

    The concept of the Fediverse is horizontal rather than vertical growth - i.e. More smaller instances rather than increasing the capacity of the larger ones. We’re also seeing that Lemmy currently only scales to a certain degree. Right now, most instances are either covered by their admin because they’re so small that the cost is manageable or instances are setting up donations.

    It’s conceivable that a business would set up an instance and charge for it - but I think it unlikely. A year town the road, though, who knows?

    • ryan213@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      1 year ago

      Hadn’t occurred to me before - I guess instances/mods can limit the number of new users they take in so it doesn’t impact performance too much.

    • Limeey@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Doesn’t really make sense, if they’re federated then you wouldn’t need to pay them to access their content. If they’re not federated then what are you paying for?

      • HSL@wayfarershaven.eu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        You’re paying for reliability, continuity, possibly a domain name which may give a sense of exclusivity. By joining a “free” server, you don’t actually have a contract or terms of service.

  • Matt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    83
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    The Fediverse as a whole cannot be monetised, censored, or taken over by hostile entities.

    Individual instances can, but they are only part of the whole and not the whole thing, so instances of Elon Musk or Steve Huffman simply cannot happen on the same scale.

    As a fun fact of the day, Wikipedia subsists entirely on charity, so it’s very possible to run things using this model if you provide enough value and transparency for people.

  • SloppyPuppy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    68
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Wikipedia is probably the most important thing on the internet fight now. It also needs some amount of servers, many crawlers scan it daily, I assume its a shitton of users and logins and API hits and what not. And still it survives on donations alone.

    Eventually lemmy is not a streaming services with videos and and a lot of bandwidth. Its just text and people connecting. So I assume you dont need massive servers and shit.

    • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      With that said, I’d encourage everyone to sign up to donate a dollar a month to your Mastodon and Lemmy instance. To me, a couple of bucks a month is worth it to not have to fight against a dumb algorithm or deal with ads.

    • Robaque@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      And if we ever want to post videos, I imagine PeerTube links would be a good way to go?

    • thawed_caveman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      I wonder how similar Lemmy is to Wikipedia in terms of storage/bandwith requirements? It’s text and pictures in both cases, but there may be nuances that i’m not aware of as a noob

      • pancakes@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        One big difference right now is that it’s a ton of small people donating their time and servers for this. So the costs aren’t as centralized and are spread over many people.

        I saw a thread of instance owners talking about why they host, and some actually get free server usage through their work or run servers already and Lemmy only uses a small portion of that.

    • WetBeardHairs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Wikipedia’s page serves simple. The documents get edited and processed into html when submitted.

      Lemmy dynamically builds the html for every single http get.

      That’s a very different cost for a server.

      • sibe@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        Umm, no? Lemmy UI is a PWA/SPA and all the html “building” happens in your browser.

        • WetBeardHairs@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          It doesn’t really matter that much if the Lemmy protocol itself doesn’t build the html - there is still a process that involves multiple steps that may or may not be server side in order to build the comment trees that we see.

          There’s a node, yea! Oh hey… that node has children! Awesome! All of those exclamation points are either server side or client side lookups. Hurray! Oh look it’s a wikiepedia article. No exclamation point lookups allowed.

  • Candelestine@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Depends how successful we are in fending off Zuck from trying to muscle his way in. That’s probably the first challenge.

    Otherwise this is a non-issue, as there will simply always be both kinds. Nothing is stopping you from simply Self-Hosting your own Lemmy server.

      • Candelestine@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes, which is why you should pick your server with care. If you do not pick one that suits your desires, that is on you.

        This will not be as effortless as reddit any time soon, so if that is your goal, you may prefer it over there.

        • ryan213@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          21
          ·
          1 year ago

          Nope, no way I’m going back. However, I’m still fairly new so I haven’t really “researched” which instances I should be joining. Except for lemmynsfw…for obvious reasons. LOL

    • iByteABit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      If they want to crate a Lemmy instance so badly, why don’t they? It’s open source, everyone can host an instance if they want to.

      The only thing I can imagine is that they’re restricted from monetizing it due to some rule of the license

    • Quinnel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think most people are assuming we’ll have the ability to fend off anything. All it’s going to take is Zuck creating a new fediverse-enabled platform and just giving everyone with an Instagram account access using their already existing accounts. We’ll be outnumbered by the millions.

      • Candelestine@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        We don’t need to become more successful than Meta in order to fend him off, so to speak. We merely need to still be here, and independent.

        • millie@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          This is a big part of the shift in mentality that needs to happen. Something doesn’t have to be the biggest to be better. We don’t need millions of concurrent users per server to enjoy connecting with other people and sharing ideas and art.

          Like, a local cafe doesn’t need to beat the profit margins of a Starbucks, it just needs to make ends meet. And it’s probably a lot better experience in the process.

  • simple@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    53
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Realistically every instance can monetize in whatever way they see fit but I highly doubt this’ll be a thing. Mastodon is way bigger and more expensive than Lemmy and it runs just fine through donations. No reason why the same won’t work here.

    Lemmy itself is also likely to follow in Mastodon’s path by getting money from sponsorships and fundraisers. See https://www.investopedia.com/how-mastodon-makes-money-7482865

      • simple@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        1 year ago

        Just a shoutout on the main website or github. Not much else, they tip in to support the project.

        A picture of the mastodon website showing its sponsors. It claims "Sponsorship does not equal influence. Mastodon is fully independent."

        • Big P@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          This might work for now, but I’m skeptical how well this would work in the long run. Do those company pay a monthly fee to be there? What happens when there’s a hundred companies on that list? What happens if a company pays a substantial amount to be there and threatens to stop paying if xyz doesn’t happen?

          • copygirl@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago
            • Just like there’s Lemmy and Kbin that powers the “threadiverse” / reddit-like portion of the fediverse, Mastodon is only one software that enables micro-blogging like experiences. There’s Pleroma, Misskey and many more. And of course there’s always the possibility for more to be developed over time.
            • Of Mastodon there’s likely hundreds of so-called “forks” out there. Since it is open source, people can take that source code, and host their own version of the project. This means they can make their own changes, include changes by others, remove features they don’t like, and so on.
            • Mastodon is not just run by a handful of people owned by a corporation, forced to work for them. Large parts of the project are contributed by volunteers, which can jump ship to another implementation as soon as they feel like the one they’ve contributed to is not acting in the interest of users.
            • Admins which actually host Mastodon instances get to decide when to update to a newer version, or whether they want to use a fork that includes the features they like (which the “official” Mastodon project has not (yet) included) or anti-features that might’ve been put there due to pressure from outside (possible but less likely).

            The power here is in the hands of users and admins. We just have to be careful not to let a company like Google or Facebook/Meta take control over a substantial portion of the fediverse. See also: How to Kill a Decentralised Network (such as the Fediverse)

            • Big P@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I do agree with most of your points, except for one.

              Mastodon is not just run by a handful of people owned by a corporation, forced to work for them.

              Yes, for now. What happens when it requires so much administration and development that someone needs to manage it? Eventually, it will get big enough that its required to be a company. You either die a hero or live long enough to see yourself become the villain.

                • Big P@feddit.uk
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I’m just aware how many projects have come in promising to be the underdog who does things differently only to end up running into the exact same challenges and making the exact same decisions as all the others

              • copygirl@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Yes and Mastodon itself is a registered non-profit organization. There’s a few people they’re able to pay to work on the projects, thanks to sponsors and donations. But there’s a lot more contributors (over 800). I think the people doing valuable work on FOSS projects have a lot of opportunity to work elsewhere if they feel like they’re being made to do things antithetical to their values. Not to mention the amount of noise they could make to expose the project and its shady goals, if that were the case. Things do work differently for FOSS projects than your average for-profit investor-driven project.

      • BlahajEnjoyer@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        1 year ago

        For many people, myself included, paying $10 a month for some VC schmuck to buy another pina coloda while he’s resting on the beach smoking a Cuban cigar laughing about how much money he made from exploitation is a no-way. On the contrary, paying $10 once every few months to cover hosting costs for a service we all enjoy using and is not misusing our funds is something a lot are happy to do.

        When I purchase something or subscribe to a service (the only subscription services I have are servers I rent sooo…) I think twice about whether I wanna spend this money because I can find a loophole around it, donating to keep my instance alive is something I’m ready to do.

        • Big P@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          And that’s really the only sustainable way things like this can exist. The Internet has been having it’s free lunch for so long we’ve forgotten how to buy our own.

          • millie@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’d say it’s more that we’ve been paying out the nose in the form of offering up our data and digital autonomy, and by allowing not only the Internet but our societies at large to degrade and polarize. We’ve paid dearly for our ‘free’ services, in the case of the US with everything from our reproductive rights to our connections with our own families and communities.

            I’d much rather pay the price of an extra latte now and then for real internet communities than deal with actual Nazis and orbital Teslas for some shitty undermoderated ad feeds infested with trolls, AI, and literal societal saboteurs on the payrolls of Putin and Winnie the Pooh.

  • Hup!@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    How many hobbiests running miniature train sets in their garage have monetized those train sets? How many backyard gardeners sell their crops.

    In most cases people who choose to develop and administrate an instance of their own are largely just hobbiests of another type. Sure it costs them some money. Many hobbies cost money, it doesn’t stop people from building things or growing things for fun.

  • MrEUser@lemmy.ninja
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I’m going to tell you a secret…. Yes.

    All those things could happen. Some people could run a site that has ads. Some people could run a site that charges a membership. Some sites could have a Patreon membership. Some sites could do subscriptions….

    And some sites could be completely free.

    The funny thing is, because of the federation, no one will be harmed. Let’s say I startup a site and all I do is pass through the cost of the site to each user. No profit, just what it costs to maintain the server is shared among the members.

    Is that unreasonable?

    • winterayars@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      There already are sites with Patreons set up for them, right? Not that you get anything out of being a member (i think). Having a Patreon (or similar) available seems like a good way to support an instance to me.

      • MrEUser@lemmy.ninja
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Agreed. But I wouldn’t say you get nothing out of being a member on Patreon. I run lemmy.ninja. If I had a paying customer (Patreon) ask for something, and I had a non paying user ask for something…

        Who do you suppose gets my time first? Now, it may be that I have to tell the paying customer that what they are asking for is only possible if code is changed. In that case I can put a request in on their behalf. However if it is a thing I CAN do, then my time goes to them first, right?

    • Stelus42@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I wonder how much that comes out to per user. Im sure its not negligable, but I have a hard time believing a few hundred text posts and images actually take $8/mo (lookin at twitter) to store on a server.

      • MrEUser@lemmy.ninja
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, that’s not how the math works. Cost of server + cost of maintaining = X. Divide X by the number of users. Example, my time is worth $60 an hour. I spend two hours a week working on the server ($120). I spend $30 a month on the server rental. $150. I have 20 users. $150/20 is $7.50…

        • Stelus42@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Hmmm interesting points. Those numbers do look pretty steep for a server with only 20 users, but I can see how there’s more too it than just the costs of a server. Im sure its also harder if you have a server that ends up hosting big communities but has few users.

          • lagomorphlecture@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            I was curious about Beehaw after hearing about them defederating and looked to see what was over there and what their content looked like. They have a stickied post at the very top that goes over the numbers if you’re curious what they’re saying it costs to run that instance. I feel like numbers could be totally variable based on a number of factors but that might give you a good idea. A smaller instance might be less and a larger one with the best hardware might be more but they’re probably all playing in the same general ballpark.

          • winterayars@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yeah you could easily run a 20n user instance on a $3 or $5 server. (Hell, even a “free trial” host if you don’t care about the amount of extra time that would require!)

  • Baby Shoggoth [she/her]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    There will probably eventually be some commercial Lemmy sites. I honestly think it would be awesome if large game studios, and software companies, and anyone else who has need for a forum, made their own federated Lemmy instances as their official support forums.

  • nix@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Besides all the discussion of nonprofits and donations, fedi server hosts have way less overhead. They’re not generally trying to profit, so they only need to break even (or run a deficit small enough to deal with out of pocket). A corporation is trying to give 6 or 7 digit salaries to CEOs and/or shareholders. So they need to extract more than the cost of hosting.

    • merc@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      Also, a site like Reddit wants something like 99.9% availability: roughly 8 hours of downtime per year. Lemmy instances are probably satisfied with 99% availability: roughly 3 days of downtime per year. If one instance is down, but the rest of the fediverse is up, it’s a bit annoying, but not devastating. Users of that instance might have to create alt accounts on another fediverse instance, and certain communities would be offline for days. But, as long as the entire fediverse itself doesn’t go down, it’s not the same as a Reddit outage.

      Getting that extra “9” of availability means having engineers on call, it means having a technical staff that creates and maintains monitoring systems, does capacity planning, runs disaster preparedness scenarios, etc. It’s expensive.

      Some fediverse admins might run monitoring systems, either because they really care about their instance, or because doing it is interesting and fun. The ones that don’t might just have to do reactive maintenance when something breaks. But, because you’re only aiming for 2 nines, it doesn’t have to be a full time job.

    • ryan213@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      “Generally not trying to profit” - but we’re all humans. If someone offered (hypothetical amount) $2M to “buy” an instance, which admins would sell?

      • Carol2852@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        29
        ·
        1 year ago

        But why would you as a user stay on that instance?

        If you start seeing ads and you don’t want to, you move to another instance. If all instances start to serve ads and you don’t want to see ads, you have to start your own instance.

      • Holodeck_Moriarty@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        But who would stay on an instance with ads or something when there are thousands of options?

        Hell, I made accounts on the top handful of instances just for situations in which one goes down for maintenance, or the admins do something weird (like defederating from big communities).

      • thawed_caveman@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think about this a lot. Lemmy fully deserves to have a lot of users, and a lot of users means a lot of opportunity to profit one way or the other, so the potential for profit-seeking behavior is there. So if we imagine a future where one instance has 500k users, it’s easy to imagine the owners trying to take it beyond the break even point and making it as profitable as possible. Anyone who puts themselves through the trouble of hosting an instance deserves to make a good living, but we don’t want predatory greedy policies.

        The question is, how easy is it to migrate your account from one instance to the other? I haven’t tried yet

        • Robaque@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’d like to know that too. The solution I’ve seen mentioned is to just create your own instance to host your own account which is… easier said than done, lol.

          It would be cool if we could keep offline backups of our accounts and “sync” them to an instance of our choosing. Migrating would be as simple as syncing up the backup to another instance. And importantly, it would be way easier than setting up one’s own linux server, most people wouldn’t even know where to start.

            • Robaque@feddit.it
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Is there any community suggestions instance? Wouldn’t mind making a post with a backups functionality request if one hasn’t been made yet 😅

      • nix@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s true, an instance would be very tempted by that. I was referring more to the day to day, there’s no incentive to squeeze users.

  • irkli@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    No insult intended but as you say, new here, rtfm a while before complaining.

    Yeah, it is a good idea for you to pay. How’s two bucks s month sound? No ads, no tracking, no personal data theft, the ability to change instances if the one you’re on goes fascist/corporate/whatever you dislike. Code you could actually modify.

    No CEO whims, no need for “growth” I’m that ever increasing destruction mode.

    It’s different than corporate media. Those of us old enough remember the early internet and beyond, bbsing. This fedi shit is the good shit. Adapt! It’s pretty fkn great.

    Lol it’s sucks now! Lol from the hyuuge influx of new people, new code, changes and a taste of chaos. I love this.

    CHANGE IS GOOD!

        • styx@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Depends on your user count and post frequency. Images take a lot of space and space is still not cheap on cloud.

  • 🇰 🔵 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Give it 15 years.

    I’ve been online since 1990; 10-15 years seems to be the maximum time a community can live without shitting itself over greed or something new and better coming along to scoop up users.

    That said, things like Usenet and IRC still technically exist… They’re just niche now. The way this shit works is more like those, so it will likely never fully disappear.

  • TheLurker@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Some people may monitize by having paid for subscriptions, like email.

    Others will offer free services with banner ads on their site, like email.

    Others will offer the service as a way to drive traffic and adoption of other services they offer, like email.

    Others will run them at their own cost because they want to, like email.

    Companies will run their own instances, like email.

    Notice a trend here. For all of you who think the Fediverse is doomed because “ermegurd not platform, is gonna fail”. Umm, email?