• spujb@lemmy.cafeOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    no offense but why did you phrase this as though you disagreed lol the graphic in the comment clearly lays out the same distinction just in a different way

    In an additional layer of complexity, the gender with which a person identifies does not always align with the sex they* are assigned at birth, and they may not be wholly male or female.

    • Dasus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      8 months ago

      I’m not disagreeing with the information in the picture, I’m reiterating it to someone who’s use of language showed they either phrased themselves poorly or don’t yet fully understand the distinction between “sex” and “gender”.

      Clarifying.

      • spujb@lemmy.cafeOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        ok gotcha personally to me it looks like they get it and typed a funky short comment but you do you 👍

        • Dasus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          8 months ago

          “many intersex possibilities on the gender spectrum” is “funky”", yeah.

          “intersex possibilities” don’t exist on the gender spectrum, because the gender spectrum is about gender and not about sex, which has it’s own (albeit more polarised) spectrum.

          Hope that makes it clear (although I thought I made it clear that was what I was objecting to in my earlier comment)

          • spujb@lemmy.cafeOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            8 months ago

            i guess i gave them a more charitable framing of their comment like: “there are many possible states of being intersex; individuals of all sexes can find themselves anywhere on the gender spectrum regardless of sex”

            without hearing what they meant, both your framing and mine are valid given such a short comment i just didn’t immediately see yours at first. cheers 🥂

            • GrymEdm@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              8 months ago

              For what it’s worth thanks for giving me the benefit of the doubt. Given that this whole post is about trans folks I think sex, sexuality, and gender are all applicable topics (with gender spectrum focal when talking about trans). I do understand the difference. To defend the person who wants clarification, perhaps I could have framed it better and I’ll change it to “and the gender spectrum” instead of “on the gender spectrum”. It’s one word and what is meant is pretty apparent to anyone who reads the article or looks at the expanded graphic - which addresses concepts of sex, sexuality, and gender and explicitly uses the term “gender spectrum” when talking about trans choices/identity.

              • spujb@lemmy.cafeOP
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                8 months ago

                no problem! language is the key thing that trans people need to understand and represent themselves and so any and all discussion towards modeling language to support that need is a positive :)

    • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      It’s important to understand the difference between sex and gender. Even within the trans community very few people understand the difference.

      Gender is about societal roles, whereas sex is about biology. You can reject your societal gender role without wanting to change your body, and you can want to change your body while embracing your gender role.

      • spujb@lemmy.cafeOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        see the rest of the comment chain; the discussion came to this understanding already