This is quite a strange thing to say. Should we close our eyes, ears, and minds to ideas that we don’t like or that don’t confirm our worldview? That doesn’t sound very healthy or likely to lead to any sort of truth.

Nice one. The good ol’ fuck-you-I-got-mine-logic.

When exactly did the US turned up in Berlin? They didn’t. Western and soviet forces met at the river Elbe

Semantics. It’s like when people say ‘Washington’ even if the sharp part of the story is happening on the other side of the world.

Furthermore with the 4+2 treaty Germany got sovereignty officially, with the opposition to the illegal invasion of Iraq 2003 Germany went fully sovereign.

And yet, here we are, with German industry falling apart because the US dictated, ‘Sanction Russia’, and all the vassals fell in line. Then they supplemented the now-re-routed-but-still-Russian fossils with US supplies. The German ruling class sacrificed the German people for US interests in the same way as did (every) other vassal state(s).

Who blew up Nordstream 2?

Greatest mystery of our time.

It was a bit late by then. Germany lost it’s sovereignty right about the time the US turned up in Berlin to stop the Soviets from advancing any further.

If Germany really had sovereignty, would it really have done so little after it’s ‘allies’ blew up Nordstream 2, causing German deindustrialisation and increasing German consumer and industrial energy insecurity?

Without genocide there would be no NATO. It’s first leaders were rehabilitated Nazis and the US, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Britain, Belgium, Italy, Spain, etc, etc, are only what they are today because the committed one genocide after another. The first four of those occupy land that they stole and retain via genocide. Some might say it’s the only thing NATO knows. Which might explain why it’s willing to sacrifice Ukraine to try to fuck with Russia.

Which UN document sanctioned the Iraq war again?

Hawaii and Puerto Rico and Germany and Korea would like a word. After them, we have some meetings scheduled with fruit companies but I can’t read the secretary’s handwriting so I may have that one wrong.

Hang on, so Russia doesn’t get it’s intelligence from the world wide web?

What would it even mean to co-operate with NATO on

climate change, human rights, integrity building and cyber defence[?]

NATO is only concerned with one of these things. Co-operation in this respect can only mean exacerbating climate change, ignoring human rights, and I don’t even know what it might mean for one of the most violent military alliances in history to build integrity.

Edit: missing question mark added.