I’m a scientist and systems engineer, particularly materials science, electrical engineering, chemical engineering, bioengineering, renewable energy, um… okay, so kind of I enjoy being a general engineer and doing a little of everything.

But I love trying to help scientists turn super technical concepts into usable prototypes because I can translate biologist to electrical engineer really effectively.

I am the star trek kind of anarchist.

  • 1 Post
  • 6 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 12th, 2023

help-circle
  • I saw the writing on the wall a few years back, it was so painfully obvious. I started switching to KiCAD early, and feel so bad for ever recommending Eagle to people who will now have to learn yet another new tool in order to find something usable.

    Fusion360 is so bad, I had to explain why SolidWorks was different earlier today and they were shocked by things like “if I move the case the board I say is attached to the case moves to” and “I don’t have to align it by eye, it’s a computer”.

    And I’m definitely not starting VMWare to run Fusion360 with nonsense online components that slow it down to uselessness and integrate it into a tool that doesn’t need to be on at all… it’s just not possible. It was obvious once they stopped updating the version. It’s pathetic nonetheless that they cannot think beyond the one-true-way of integrating a dozen mediocre tools into one extra-mediocre product.


  • I mean, largely to me this is fine and great as long as the reverse is also true. It’s fabulous to have two totally independent systems that are fully interoperable to such an extent.

    I don’t think there’s a meaningful competition in growth or anything, that’s just a number. The main downside is reduced development focus…

    But – If Lemmy is like a frontend for kbin and vice versa, isn’t that fine? The Lemmy apps will load kbin posts and kbin apps will load lemmy posts.


  • TL;DR: I think it is basically impossible to have that much money and claim it was earned ethically. Therefore it is basically impossible to be “good” without giving it away.

    I think that it is borderline impossible to ethically accrue that much wealth. Is it possible? Maybe? I’d love to hear more examples of where a company owner made sure all their employees shared in the success when the company is large enough that the owner is that rich. I remember hearing that Google did right by their early employees, but it’s been the exception that makes the rule and was also a long time ago in a different world where their ethics were different anyway.

    And if you inherit that much wealth, what are the odds that it came to you free and clear of having been generated from exploiting others? Colonizing/“settling” and redlining making property values super high? Using eminent domain to tear down minority major communities for the sake of putting an interstate down the middle instead of risking devaluing the richest people’s property more? Because odds are that even if they didn’t cause the system they certainly benefited from it.

    And unfortunately, “charity” is a horror in the USA because it’s used as a very bad and very biased by rich people version of an actual welfare system that worked. The idea that there are food banks operating off donations while billionaires exist is horrific. If billionaires did not exist I frankly think that a lot more things like food banks (and public transit maybe?) would find themselves with funding.