Musst du das an dem Tag Posten, an dem ich ausnahmsweise unser Fahrradparkhaus nicht nutzen konnte und mangels sicherer Alternativen mein Fahrrad in einem “Hochrisikogebiet” für Diebstähle abschließen musste? :(

in a modern engine.

Well, at least more modern than oblivion, Skyrim’s is 12 years old…

(Die den Antragstellern heute möglicherweise peinlich sind. )

Nee, das ist niemandem peinlich, so funktioniert einfach Forschungsfinanzierung. Man sucht raus, auf welche Schlagworte die Geldgeber gerade abfahren, schreibt irgendein wildes Projekt zusammen, benennt Methoden um, damit sie trendy klingten (zB. Klassifizierung in Künstliche Intelligenz) und das Geld verschwindet dann irgendwo in der Abteilung. Wenn Berichte fällig werden, schreibt man über irgendwelche halbwegs passenden Projekte, egal worüber die finanziert wurden.

Wir haben auf Neurowissenschaftlichen Konferenzen gerne rumgefragt, wer eigentlich an den Projekten arbeitet, für die er offiziell angestellt und bezahlt wird. Tage an denen die Quote 50:50 war, waren da noch gut…

Fachkräftemangel in vielen Bereichen ist aber wiederrum auch nur das Fehlen von Leuten die zu den aktuellen Konditionen in den Berufen arbeiten möchten und ein Unwillen neue Leute anzulernen.

The GPU of the series S is simply a lot worse, socutting quality by a bit won’t cut it. I also suspect that since they always quote the split screen as problem, it might be about the number of textures to be loaded in when the game is kind of running twice, not the quality.

Personally I don’t mind, but I find it problematic mostly because not everyone can be around dogs, be it because of allergies or past experiences.

A quick search doesn’t find it in either the Canada or United States versions, for example. I wonder if that’s due to better consumer protection laws in some jurisdictions than others.

Now that I think about it, it might not even be consumer protection but instead a GDPR issue. I’m in Europe. Users becoming inactive can actually force companies to delete their data. Ubisoft might not have any other choice than to completely delete inactive users and of course they’ll do what is best for them, not for the inactive users.

Die IT hat vor allem einen Engpass an hochqualifizierten Leuten, die für wenig Geld arbeiten möchten.
Die Leute frisch von der Uni werden abgelehnt, weil sie keine Erfahrung haben, die erfahrenen werden abgelehnt, weil zu teuer, die ausländischen Bewerber werden abgelehnt, weil sie nicht fließend Deutsch sprechen. Keine Bewerber mehr über?! Fachkräftemangel in der IT! Die guten Fachkräfte tun sich das oft gar nicht mehr an, wenn sie bereits vermuten können, dass sie eh nicht das bekommen, was sie möchten. Bei Unternehmen erweckt das zusätzlich den Eindruck, dass erfahrene Leute Mangelware sind, weil “die bewerben sich gar nicht auf unsere Juniorstelle mit 10 Jahren Erfahrung!!!”.

Zusätzlich fallen Werkstudenten da raus, weil sie allgemein eine eigene Nische füllen sollen: Arbeiten, für die Facharbeiter zu Schade sind, wenig Vorerfahrung brauchen und oft nicht dringend erledigt werden müssen. Da viele Studiengänge an Hochschulen Industriepflichtpraktika enthalten, ist es da allgemein nicht sehr schwer ein Menge an Bewerbungen zu erhalten, denen man teils sogar deutlich weniger als den Mindestlohn zahlen darf. Und da kann man dann wählerisch sein und nur Leute die halt doch irgendwelche Vorerfahrungen haben einladen, die sind meiner Erfahrung nach immer früher oder später im Bewerberstapel.

They indeed just “license” the games to us:

The Services and Content are licensed to you, not sold. This means we grant you a personal, limited, non-transferable and revocable right and license to use the Services and access the Content, for your entertainment, non-commercial use, subject to your compliance with these Terms.

For termination, it’s not any reason but a lot of reasons, including the here discussed:

for any other reason in relation to your actions in or outside of the Services; upon notification, where your Account has been inactive for more than six months.

The first one opens a lot of options for them to find a reason. None of those would trigger any reimbursement, though.

Consequences of the Termination/Suspension of an Account.

You cannot use the Services and Content anymore.
In the event of termination of your Account or of Service(s) associated with your Account, no credit (such as for unused Services, unused subscription period, unused points or Ubisoft Virtual Currency) will be credited to you or converted into cash or any other form of reimbursement.

Source

I didn’t want to say that Twitters execution of it is perfect, it’s just why Elon comes up with all these seemingly insane ideas. He has a huge userbase that won’t leave, he had advertisers who he thought wouldn’t want to leave and now he’s trying to squeeze. The problem is that he obviously didn’t have his grasp as tightly around the advertisers as he thought, which is why step 3 of Enshittitication entirely fails, at least from what is known to us. The idea is to keep everyone kind of hostage while you squeeze and while it seems to work with a huge chunk of the userbase, a bigger portion of the advertisers simply move on.

Putting a name on a century-old concept isn’t the worst idea because now we can easily refer to it when it happens once again. And yes, the old age of that problem is why I consider it a bit of a rabit-hole. It’s not just something Twitter does now or that tech companies do now because they copy from each other. It’s a quite old concept you’ll hear about again and again and can read up on quite a bit, if you really are interested into more than the basic concept or why companies keep trying even though the outcome does not always see positive (from an outside, users perspective).

Look up enshittitication, it’s an interesting rabbit hole.

Basically, the idea is that there is a path companies go along where they first please users to build a user base, once you are bound to a platform and don’t want to leave (because “everyone” is there) they instead start to shift towards pleasing advertisers until they also feel trapped (because “everyone” advertises there). The final move is trying to squeeze as much as possible out of all these trapped people and companies. It’s not just social media, although this of course makes it most obvious at least for a trapped user base. But this also applies for any other big thing that “evryone” uses.

All 22 are:

• The Beginners 2023 Cyber Security Awareness Training Course
• Writing Secure Code in ASP.NET
• The Complete Guide to Android Bug Bounty Penetration Tests
• Intermediate Ethical Hacking Hands-on Training
• Offensive Hacking Unfolded - Become a Pro Pentester
• Burp Suite Unfiltered - Go from a Beginner to Advanced
• Web Hacking Expert - Full-Stack Exploitation Mastery
• Fundamentals of Secure Software
• Practical Cyber Hacking Skills for Beginners
• Risk Management for Cyber Security Managers
• The Complete Ethical Hacking Course
• Software Security Testing
• Pentesting Fundamentals for Beginners
• Ethical Hacking - Capture the Flag Walkthroughs - v1
• Ethical Hacking - Capture the Flag Walkthroughs - v2
• Web Hacker’s Toolbox - Tools Used by Successful Hackers
• Becoming a Cyber Security Professional - A Beginner’s Career Guide
• The Absolute Beginners 2023 Guide to Cybersecurity - Part 3
• Cyber Security for Absolute Beginners - 2022 Edition - Part 01
• Cyber Security for Absolute Beginners - 2022 Edition - Part 02
• Learn Man in the Middle Attacks from Scratch.
• Learn Ethical Hacking From A-Z: Beginner To Expert Course

He is no longer CEO, not that it actually makes a difference.

This story gives me some Junji Ito vibes. shudders

That though process won’t even cross their mind. More like “See? The reopened communities are very active and actually generate MORE clicks now. We were right to force them open!”. Only if the new direction would produce less clicks or advertisers are bothered by it (“I wanted to advertise my camera in r/pics but the new direction makes it unprofitable”) they might look into where that “sabotage” is coming from and care about it.

I’d say for a secure password in a manager, it’s not really harmful.
Someone who uses a manager and secure passwords will usually be aware of the “generate me a new unique, secure password” feature, so they will generate a new one and simply paste that into the page. They might be inclined to just add the bad practice “-01” although it honestly doesn’t make a unique, secure password worse unless the unencrypted password was somehow leaked. The delay in emergency situations mentioned in the post might still happen, although the harm there will depend on the exact situation and likely usually fall into the “annoying delay” category.

I absolutely agree that forced password changes need to die simply because a majority of users still tries to remember passwords and is therefore prone to bad practices, but for someone with a password manager and unique passwords it’s more unnecessary and annoying than actively harmful.