So at the absolute highest margin of error, Trump has a very small lead. Conversely the same could be true in the other direction and it could be 6.4 points ahead.
So at the absolute highest margin of error, Trump has a very small lead. Conversely the same could be true in the other direction and it could be 6.4 points ahead.
I suspect the issue here was confusion around what “it” was as the sentence has two possible subjects - “the cat” and “tail”. Given cat was the primary subject, it probably assumed you wanted the arrow pointing to the cat.
Don’t forget convicted felon
Desktop computers that have a vertically standing motherboard.
I like the ones that DO get stolen, because it’s an indication that they are that in-demand!
There are lots of potential ways, especially when you own a large social media platform that doesnt have rational reasons for blocking certain political content over others that skew a particular way.
Ah thanks for clarifying! I was confused how poutine was involved.
Guess Reddit liked the idea too and decided to expand on it, for profits
The glasses are just less obvious than me pointing my phone at you and snapping a picture
My senior dev was asked for his transcript and he’s been in the field for 25+years. He told them to get in touch with his college that doesn’t exist anymore. Suspect it’s a standard set of forms they need to fill.
Though, he’s got small hands so what could he possibly do? /s
Sorry, we had the settings misconfigured and “mildly” scorched your hippocampus.
Let’s be real parking illegally or not paying your debts is bad.
Seriously. Especially with the massive trade tarrifs he’s proposing… You think companies are just going to bend over and accept those extra expenses? No. They are just going to pass that expense onto the consumer as a cost of doing business.
I checked mine the other day and it had like 6gb of cache used. Luckily, it’s easy to clear if you know how, but ideally it should self-clear periodically
Trump will argue with a cheeseburger
And will angrily eat it when it wins the argument
The article mentions and switches between “lawyers for the state said California” and “lawyers from then-California Attorney General Kamala Harris’ office”, which sounds like it’s intentionally conflating Harris’s direct involvement
Technical question - would “every bond you break” include atomic bonds from food being broken down?
Can you come install one near me?