Poke
I think it’s nothing particularly weird, I’ve always assumed that there are spores in the soil and it happens when it gets a bit too much water, no? I don’t think they need to worry :)
Thank you so much! I was also advised to use dish soap with water :). Is that good?
Thanks! I know what to google now!
I would advise not training your own model but instead use tools like langchain and chroma, in combination with a open model like gpt4all or falcon :).
So in general explore langchain!
Rocky Linux, AlmaLinux, and Oracle Linux for example.
Wow it looks so good!
True! My gf is a chemist and said that there used to be that saying that if you hadn’t had your Nobel by 35 then you failed :S
Also you don’t usually get a Nobel at the beginning of your career?
Make Indian food :D. It’s a gigantic country filled with vegetarians, they have some sick recipes :)
Actually yeah! I have two big ones and maybe 10 small ones starting!
I will soon be able to agree with you but it’s the first time I’m having cucumber :)
Cool! What model is it? What is it for? :)
I ended up making the robotics_and_ai community. Let’s see how it goes :)
I ended up making the robotics_and_ai community. Let’s see how it goes :)
Give a try to being a vegetarian for a bit. It’s so much easier than just 3 years ago! There are a tons of replacement for meat today that are quite good and not expensive!
Interesting article! I wholeheartedly agree with every other topic but I partly disagree on the AI front. AI has a topic is much wider than crypto and nfts, and better defined than the meta verse. It has concrete uses from document extraction, to protein prediction, and data analysis. However, where I agree with the author is that, on platform like LinkedIn, you find so many quacks who are suddenly experts, telling how AI is the game changer that you didn’t know for something completely unrelated. There is a va lot of pseudo science and false (but seemingly logic) conclusions thrown around. And that’s where the gift is: not in the technology, but in the marketing by scammers.
E.g. they keep on pushing that, as an expert, AI will replace you unless you adapt and that only those who use ai will survive. However, early research shows the opposite and that using AI actually help low performers and has little impact for experts. Here is an interesting podcast on it
I think you are absolutely correct for the interpretation of the photon count :)
I appreciate the link. I am going slowly through the article that I find interesting because I like graphs and structure, but I have no idea if any of it holds for actual physics and I didn’t know the man before. Now I have a better idea of why people where answering this to this post (although it seems a little bit exaggerated) :).