• guylacaptivite@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    We’ve had walls for millennias. Way simpler than AR visors and holographic lines. They work great too, just look at baku and Monaco.

    • woelkchen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      We’ve had walls for millennias. Way simpler than AR visors and holographic lines.

      Maybe horseback riding is more for you?

      Walls mean a track becomes deadly for motorcycle racing. F1 is supposed to be at the forefront of technology anyway and spin-offs of such tech could be used in real cars when driving in misty conditions.

      • guylacaptivite@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Fair enough, then we don’t race on moto gp tracks as we agree it’s too dangerous for them. There’s plenty of tracks where they don’t get out of the lines because it’s either slower or your race is done if you go over. Lines and penalties don’t work no matter what we argue here. Every single driver will tell you they want a physical limit not a theoretical one. The problem is track design not driver visibility. They go out by centimeters at worse, that’s not the kind of thing an AR visor will fix.