Sounds like EA/Nintendo pricing has taken hold.

  • Caesium@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    2 days ago

    yeah this is a lil fucked up way to even try to announce pricing, or avoid announcing it in this matter

    • Gamoc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Premium in this context means it’ll cost money. Not full priced means it won’t be £70.

      • alessandro@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        I don’t even understand what they mean…

        Something on the line “We wish we could charge you the 80$, AAA, price; hoverer, we didn’t implemented decent AI bot for you to play with/against… so we need players themselves to do the job

        TL;DR: 20€/$

          • alessandro@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            Just to be clear, I didn’t mean that 20€ is the right price… honestly I think that if they put the 20$ price tag, it would be still too expensive. If you take a look here you can see the industry standard for online-only games free and paid (Sony, Microsoft and Nintendo don’t share this data; but I think Valve is the overall winner/standard for the last generations of the gaming industry)