Access options:

Yes, this means a ton of carbon ends up in the atmosphere instead of in the trees. The right move would be thinning and prescribed burns, but this administration isn’t going to do that.

  • Eyedust@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    RIP My first thought. Seems appropriate.

    Just fyi, I’m pointing out Trump’s similarities to an evil villain. I’m not using this to agree. I’m very much against this, having grown up in the woods (practically raised by my local forest, as my mother was an awful drunk and single parent) and I spent most of my youth walking through the peace and quiet of the trees.

    I grew up with my mother seeing nothing but my father in me, and was abused for it. Those trees gave me the shelter I needed and I would have been 100x more a mess if I didn’t have them. So no. Don’t take my fucking trees en masse.