• 74 183.84@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    No. Try to think critically next time. AI has been mostly garbage which is why I dislike it. It should not be used in court. Did you even read the article? If so, re-read it

    • _cryptagion [he/him]@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yes, I did read it. I’m guessing you did not. if you had, you would know why he used the AI video. This was a very constructive use of AI that not only didn’t hurt anyone, but helped someone with a problem.

      • borth@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 minutes ago

        They didn’t have a problem that needed the AI to help. Unless the problem was “how do I get free advertising?”. This other comment has the timestamp and video (https://sh.itjust.works/comment/17839497), and the judge specifically says that the defendant has been in that court many times before, and now that they have an AI business, suddenly they have a problem and need the AI, without informing the court of the “need” for such a tool.