• CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    67
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Christ, if we even have elections after this, we will desperately need a FDR 2.0 and a Congress that backs him and they will need a Progressive Project 2029.

    • Jhex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      20 hours ago

      If you are waiting for that, you are already defeated

      You need to take to the street NOW and enact a national strike

      • MountingSuspicion@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        21 hours ago

        I think she’d be a great choice but we need a white guy to run. I hate to say it, but we need every advantage possible, and being a white man is an advantage. Maybe an AOC VP makes sense, but I’m very worried that the there’s at least enough truth to the racism/sexism claims about last year and I am sick of gambling peoples futures on candidates we know are going to struggle.

        • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          18 hours ago

          I was thinking the same thing. I also hate it. There are a lot of people that might sign on for the progressive policies of AOC, but see a woman and see someone that is a POC and assume radicalism as some kind of default just by the mere act of being a woman and POC, and get skittish.

          If you put the same words and policies in the mouth of a Walz, it’d make the much-needed medicine go down nice and easy. If there was some way we could get a nice folksy white guy and let them be a literal puppet for an AOC (or Bernie), I’d be all for it.

        • Liz@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          13 hours ago

          We need to run an exciting candidate. Their race doesn’t matter. Elections these days are about getting your base excited and making the opponent’s apathetic. AOC is exciting. While her being a minority woman will piss off far right voters, it won’t be like it was with Hilary, who had decades of media attacks conditioning the right to absolutely despise her.

          • MountingSuspicion@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 hours ago

            Really wish/hope that’s the case, but if there was an equivalent white guy, I don’t think I’d chance it. It might be that AOC is such an exciting candidate it overshadows any race/gender issues, and I’d love that, but I think a primary will help answer that. Maybe not even the winner, since who knows what the party will do to put their finger on the scale, but a primary will definitely show who’s energized the voters. Fingers crossed we get elections next go around.

          • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            13 hours ago

            We need to run an exciting candidate

            I’m tired of this comment.

            If we look for entertainers to become leaders, we get a trump. If we look for legislators, they’re not sexy.

            If the populace needs a clown to vote for, then let’s stop messing about and secede already.

    • jason@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 day ago

      And anyone mentioning reaching across the aisle is automatically out. And the filibuster… gone. Without question.