• thefartographer@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    19 hours ago

    No, PT Barnum was at least entertaining. Sure, he just wanted to take your money, but he didn’t kill people in the process and you got a pretty reasonable value for paying admission.

    • ✺roguetrick✺@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      He was mostly lucky in that regard. The amount of fires Barnum had with only animals dying and not people is pretty impressive. He had at least five buildings burn down alone. One of his fires at the American museum had a nice effect due to the cold weather in New York at the time.

      It took a while after his death before one of the big top shows really went up in smoke with significant loss of life.

      https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hartford_circus_fire

      • thefartographer@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 minutes ago

        If I’ve learned anything from your elaboration, it’s that I should vote for an arsonist, but only if they burn things for insurance money rather than murder.

        On a more serious note, the first fire alarm boxes weren’t invented until Barnum was 42, and still took some time to spread from Boston. Places weren’t super-well equipped to deal with normal fires, much less ones that started in places filled with hay, dust, paint, paper, and dyed cloth.