If you do, then what exactly defines a soul in your view?

  • Kissaki@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    A part of humans regarded as immaterial, immortal, separable from the body at death, capable of moral judgment, and susceptible to happiness or misery in a future state.

    • juliebean@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      considering many non-humans seem perfectly capable of making moral judgements, and feeling happiness or misery (all actions which appear to be explicable by purely material means), a ‘soul’ seems unnecessary to explain such things in humans. and it seems the very height of anthropocentrism to say that humans are immortal (despite all evidence to the contrary) while everything else just dies. why would just humans have these souls instead of, say, dolphins, or wild boars, or rattlesnakes, or coastal redwoods?