• entropicdrift@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    5 days ago

    Inner cities are better served by trolleys/buses anyhow. Self-driving taxis would work best at the edges of a city, or to fill gaps between train stations in suburbs

    • DdCno1@beehaw.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      4 days ago

      How would self-driving taxis do this any better than taxis that already exist and aren’t relying on large tech corporations?

      • ContrarianTrail@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        4 days ago

        Cheaper, safer and one extra seat.

        We’re obviously not there yet but I haven’t heard a single good argument for why we wouldn’t be in the future.

      • entropicdrift@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        I don’t think they’d do much better besides being safer, eventually. Just saying that’s the only place where they’d make sense to go.

        Edit: giving it a bit more thought, they should also have greater passenger capacity for their size

        • leetnewb@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          If safer is a realistic outcome, perhaps things would further evolve. Ride share cars today are dual-use vehicles that typically carry driver + no passenger or driver + one passenger with the capacity for 3-5. If future autonomous ride share cars turn out to be dedicated to ride share, maybe most would end up being 3-wheel with just one or two seats. Shrinking the size of a substantial potion of cars on urban roads could be beneficial to road safety, power/carbon intensity, road capacity/density (which could also lead to more equitable road use for bikes and pedestrians).