About time. This also applies to their older models such as M2 and M3 laptops.

In the U.S., the MacBook Air lineup continues to start at $999, so there is no price increase associated with the boost in RAM.

The M2 macbook air now starts at $1000 for 16GB RAM and 256GB storage. Limited storage aside, that’s surprisingly competitive with most modern Windows laptops.

  • yeehaw@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 hour ago

    Perfect, just when I’ve decided 16GB is the bare minimum these days too. My day to day I max out 16 on my laptops without even trying. 32 is my new minimum.

    • Telorand@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I dunno if I’d even consider them an industry leader, unless you break down their ubiquity by industry category (in which they lead graphic design and maybe video editing, iirc). They lead phone sales in the US by a lot, but their overall desktop share is still relatively small (<10%), and their global footprint is buoyed only by iOS (which is still below Windows and Android).

      I would say they’re an innovator, and they push certain companies to innovate, but they don’t really lead by that many metrics.

  • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    The localllama people are feeling quite mixed about this, as they’re still charging through the nose for more RAM. Like, orders of magnitude more than the bigger ICs actually cost.

    It’s kinda poetic. Apple wants to go all in on self-hosted AI now, yet their incredible RAM stinginess over the years is derailing that.

  • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    insultingly tiny, unupgradeable storage aside, that’s surprisingly competitive with most modern Windows laptops

    • simple@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      It’s not ideal, but you’re getting probably the best hardware in the market in return. The M series still dominates Windows CPUs, and the build quality on most $1000 laptops leaves a lot to be desired.

      • schizo@forum.uncomfortable.business
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        2 hours ago

        build quality on most $1000 laptops

        You’re not kidding.

        I have a couple of laptops from various vendors, and they’re all built like shit.

        ASUS is especially eyerolly: the case is literally crumbling into pieces. Like seriously? You couldn’t have picked a material that’s not literally going to disintegrate in two years on a $1200 laptop?

        • simple@lemm.eeOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Yeah, a lot of manufacturers are just bad. I knew people who had Dell and MSI laptops and those things feel like toys. Cheap plastic and very wobbly hinges. The only manufacturer I genuinely trust is Lenovo. My Legion is a bit thick but I can at least rest easy that it’s built well.

          • schizo@forum.uncomfortable.business
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 hour ago

            Lenovo is, outside of their really cheap consumer options - like, the $500-and-under options - are pretty solid.

            But yeah build quality is one reason when I roll my eyes at the ‘haha stupid buying apple! apple tax! lol ripped off!’ crowd: I mean maybe, but as soon as you pick up a Macbook whatever it’s immediately obvious that you’re getting something for what you’re paying, and not some bendy flexy piece of plastic crap that will maybe physically survive the warranty period, but not much more.

      • yeehaw@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 hour ago

        The best? Debatable. You ever watch Louise on YouTube? He constantly rags on bad hardware design when repairing MacBooks lol.

  • kandoh@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 hours ago

    With no programs running my mac mini is using 16gb so I’m not surprised

    • Carnelian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 hour ago

      That’s normal for these computers. Idea being it doesn’t really benefit you to have a ton of empty ram sitting around waiting to be used. So the OS makes no effort to clear it out until the space is needed.

      If you believe their marketing it’s actually doing the opposite, and preemptively loading stuff into ram in order to make your common tasks feel as snappy as possible. But yeah either way you’ll notice the memory is always “full”, but you never seem run out

      • kandoh@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Well that would be good, but it goes completely against how i’ve learned to manage my machine these past three decades.

        • Carnelian@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          25 minutes ago

          Yeah it was a trip for me as well to adapt to the new ways. For example it took me a long long time to adjust to allowing the computer to manage the multitasking for me. I would habitually always close out programs I wasn’t using, because I felt deeply from my decades of experience that running tons of things at once would cause many issues.

          I was very uncomfortable letting all these “active” programs pile up, but it really turned out to be all good. The computers are designed to be used this way. And really, I’m better off for it, not having to go in and micromanage everything constantly.

          What I’m trying to say is that learning is not something that is ever finished, you know? There came a day when we stopped defragmenting our hard drives, and now the day has arrived where the computer utilizes all the ram all the time