• Ghostwurm@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    23
    ·
    edit-2
    9 days ago

    Nope didn’t read. Admittedly, thought it was just the movie wiki and didn’t go that far. I made comment about the movie not the director. In the context of the article and allegations against Coppola, I am not defending gross and entitled behaviors. Another example of how complicated it is to consider or enjoy the art of transgressors.

    • Ptsf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      9 days ago

      Should probably read things before chiming in. At least, if they’re pivotal to the conversation.

      • Ghostwurm@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        8 days ago

        Not going to digest an entire article for a link with no context, which on its face doesn’t suggest the actions of an individual. Why would I pick out that aspect? Why am I the defender against allegations of bad behavior? That’s ridiculous.

        Edit: when I first responded there was no direct link to the allegations section, it was just the wiki for the movie. A link without context saying “fuck this”. But hey, people apparently know the intentions of strangers from a single hot take, what a skill. Enjoy your echo chamber.