• Zombiepirate@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    67
    ·
    1 year ago

    Oh, I’d put money on them keeping him in a vegetative state if he croaks just to keep a Democrat out of power.

    It would be the culmination of his life’s work.

      • Unaware7013@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s funny how on certain topics (and to be clear, VERY few), the Dems and reps are the same. The Dems have feinstein who’s in a similar state, and she’s got people keeping her in office because they don’t like who the governor is(n’t) going to pick

        • krayj@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          21
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          Feinstein is an order of magnitude more cognizant than McConnell, and yet a great many Dems want to see her removed also…and you just don’t see that kind of parity with the GOP.

          • Unaware7013@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            19
            ·
            1 year ago

            I wouldn’t go as far as to say the lady who tried to give a speech during a roll call vote, ceded power of attorney to her daughter and has to heavily rely on her staff to function is more mentally cognizant than the turtle by any stretch. He’s struggling, but she’s on another level.

            But you’re right, there’s at least calls from the Dems to kick her out, so there is a decent difference between the two parties. I just wish the leadership felt the same way.

            • paintbucketholder@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Leadership wants her out, and she finally accepted the option of letting another Democratic senator temporarily fill her position on the Judiciary Committee while she was unable to attend for many, many weeks in the most recent episode - but Republicans refused.

              At that point, Democratic leadership can decide that they want her out so badly that they’ll simply hand Republicans a win. Or they can try to get her back in her seat with her hand on the button, so that Democrats can get at least a few wins in the Judiciary Committee.

              I want Feinstein out, but I still think Democratic leadership made the correct decision.

          • jscummy@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            1 year ago

            There’s reports from colleagues that they need to repeatedly reintroduce themselves to her during the same meeting. She was completely unaware of her own months long absence from the capital.

            There’s definitely more Democrats calling for her retirement than GOP calling for McConnells (AFAIK there are zero), but saying she’s an “order of magnitude more cognizant” is pretty damn generous

          • minorninth@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            1 year ago

            That’s ridiculous, Feinstein is clearly far more gone.

            The issue isn’t her replacement, it’s that Dems would lose control of all of the committees she’s on.

            I don’t believe for one second that Democrats and Republicans are the same or equally corrupt.

            In this case, though, it does seem like they’re both playing the same stupid game due to their own seniority rules.

        • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s not about who Gavin Newsom would or would not pick, it’s a matter of the Judicial Committee being brought to it’s knees if she’s out.

          They can’t appoint a replacement without cooperation from the Republicans, and the Republicans would rather stall the committee than replace her.

    • Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 year ago

      Like they did with Strom Thurmond. Dude had to be wheeled onto the Senate floor and looked half dead by the end.

      Part of the reason this happens is committee seniority is determined by length of time in the Senate, so to control committees it’s important to keep Senators in office as long as possible for both parties.

    • darq@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think some people might read this comment and think you are describing some satirical hyperbolic scenario. But given what we have seen from conservatives over the last few years, It’s not just possible, it’s their normal.

      • Zombiepirate@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        Oh, to be clear: I’m 1000% serious.

        I expect the same for any of their SCROTUS justices who beef it.

        • Maturin@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          William Rehnquist had a speaker installed in his private bathroom and the last couple of years on the court, he would suddenly disappear from the bench during oral arguments, but never worry, he could still hear them arguing on his special toilet speaker before making decisions that would affect hundreds of millions of people.