Ukraine attacked Moscow on Wednesday with at least 11 drones that were shot down by air defences in what Russian officials called one of the biggest drone strikes on the capital since the war in Ukraine began in February 2022.

The war, largely a grinding artillery and drone battle across the fields, forests and villages of eastern Ukraine, escalated on Aug. 6 when Ukraine sent thousands of soldiers over the border into Russia’s western Kursk region.

For months, Ukraine has also fought an increasingly damaging drone war against the refineries and airfields of Russia, the world’s second largest oil exporter, though major drone attacks on the Moscow region - with a population of over 21 million - have been rarer.

Russia’s defence ministry said its air defences destroyed a total of 45 drones over Russian territory, including 11 over the Moscow region, 23 over the border region of Bryansk, six over the Belgorod region, three over the Kaluga region and two over the Kursk region.

  • AbsentBird@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    I’m not sure that fire-with-fire strategy is the most effective. At least historically it seems to have mixed results. I think going after their economy makes the most sense: sanctions, refinery attacks, sabotage; hit them in the wallet, break their capacity to continue the carnage.

    • intensely_human@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      It works if you can actually hit the people who attacked you.

      The more layers of abstraction between a populace and its government/army, the less likely “retaliation” against the populace will actually succeed as retaliation.

      This is basically the problem with the “Israel/Palestine” conflict. People want to think of it as two parties in conflict but it is not. It is four parties:

      • IDF
      • Israeli citizens
      • Hamas
      • Palestinian civilians

      That four-player nature to the game makes the traditional tit-for-tat strategy break down, which is why the conflict doesn’t end.

      • InvertedParallax@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        You’re missing the settlers and their ultranationalist allies.

        They’re basically the mirror to Hamas.

    • InvertedParallax@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      I think we need to do both, there is no reason to hold back on any front.

      Break the country, then we can figure out how to move forward properly.

      We tried the kind and gentle approach after the ussr, which was the right thing then, but they don’t respond well, they considered it weakness.

      That only leaves the other extreme.