Hey guys, what are the pros and cons to wayland if I intend to use my PC for gaming + others?

Comparisons to X?

General impressions?

Your advice on if I should use it or stick with X?

My PC parts are arriving soon, and while Ive been a linux user since 2016 its the first time I intend to fully main drive linux, so I guess im just looking for as much information as I can get on it.

Feel free to post links to articles or anything that will answer if you prefer, we’re on a link aggregator after all ;) and I dont mind reading.

Thanks in advance :)

  • wysiwym@feddit.de
    1·
    1 year ago

    The pros and cons boil down to wayland has no awesomewm-like window manager and Xorg has, well, awesomewm…

  • Infiltrated_ad8271@kbin.social
    1·
    1 year ago

    Many users seem to think that the only problem is nvidia, but it’s not true, app compatibility is still a very noticeable problem sometimes.
    For example, as far as I know there are still no on-screen keyboards, except for those integrated into desktops, if they have them at all.

  • LaggyKar@programming.dev
    0·
    1 year ago

    One pro of Wayland is better multi-monitor. X11 can’t really handle mixed refresh rates, nor multi-monitor VRR, and per-monitor DPI scaling isn’t easily done. Of course, Nvidia doesn’t support Wayland VRR yet, nor does GNOME, but Plasma or wlroots on AMD should work. Wlroots btw is the Wayland compositor library e.g. Sway and Hyprland is based on.

    Forced vsync has been a problem for gaming on Wayland, though that’s in the process of changing due to the tearing protocol, at least on Plasma and wlroots, doesn’t seem like GNOME has picked it up yet.

    • lack@sh.itjust.works
      1·
      1 year ago

      This (multi-monitor support) is exactly why I switched to sway from i3wm, and haven’t looked back.

      Not a gamer, so I can’t speak to that aspect, but for everything I do there’s not much difference.