• go $fsck yourself@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    6 months ago

    I literally did that and I was not convinced, nor do I think that is good enough evidence. I did not find anything on their site about how much of their results are from Bing.

    There’s no need to be such as asshole. Why the shit would I take your word when you’re needlessly being such a dick because I simply am asking for more information? Jesus fuck.

      • go $fsck yourself@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        I already explained that it’s perfectly common for things to seem similar or identical when they are far more different than they seem. Humans often find patterns when there are none.

        And I also already explained I looked at the DDG site and I didn’t happen to find that page. I did find articles on other sites mentioning that they source from Bing, but didn’t really mention to what extent.

        So, yes. You are absolutely being a dick by assuming I did none of that and acting the way you are. I literally only was asking for more information and explaining why.

        You also left out this large piece of context which definitely makes it less straightforward that “all their results are identical enough to make them the same” as you claim

        We also maintain our own crawler (DuckDuckBot) and many indexes to support our results. Of course, we have more traditional links and images in our search results too, which we largely source from Bing.