• Antikythera@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    You’re not wrong, but just because the USA and UK got away with it doesn’t mean we should continue to let others get away with it. We can’t go back in time and fix it but we’ve got to start somewhere.

    • GarbageShoot [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      73
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Can you even manage in a fever dream to think that this would set a precedent that would result in the US ever getting punished?

      • TheMage@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        Punished for what? Throwing money and military support towards everyone when they need it? Oh, that. Right. As always, hating the USA is what the cool kids do these days. Until they need taxpayer money or military support. I’d love to see us cut off every ounce of support we give to other nations and see how that works out.

    • judgeholden [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      65
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      it’s just a coincidence that this stuff only ever starts with our state enemies huh? only the bad countries get sanctioned for doing the same things we/our allies do. only Russia has to compete with neutral flags. only African leaders get prosecuted in the ICC.

      it’s all nonsense used to manufacture consent for war and military spending

      • Tankiedesantski [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        “Not arresting this black man for possession of 0.01 grams of weed isn’t going to go back in time and punish all those white guys we let go despite possessing much more weed. Cuff him, boys.”

      • Fazoo@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Russia competes with neutral flags because they can’t stop doping. It has nothing to do with us vs them. They literally can’t stop cheating.

            • aaaaaaadjsf [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              19
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Common sense?

              Have you played sports before? Even at the high school level teenagers are pumping their body full of steriods. I saw them do it myself, I’ve heard the stories from my friends who played rugby. Just look at top high school rugby or american football teams physiques, or at the cardio capacity of teenage track and field athletes. You really think that level is attainable without performance enhancing drugs, at such a widespread level? You really think that stops once these athletes become adults? How about the fact that all of Usain Bolt’s competition got caught doping? You can’t be this gullible. Seriously, read the article I’ve linked below.

              https://www.cbsnews.com/chicago/news/bernstein-usain-bolt-is-probably-doping-and-you-know-it/

              Russia’s sin here was official state involvement, not doping. As long as you pass the drug tests, nothing matters. Remember that Lance Armstrong never failed a drug test. Does that mean he’s a clean athlete? Of course not, and neither was any of his competition. The same applies to the Olympics, the same applies to almost all competitive sports.

                • 420blazeit69 [he/him]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  21
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Why make such a stupid comment? “Oh you mean literally every athlete is doping, well show me the piss of literally every athlete ever, oh that’s impossible? Fucking rekt”

                  smuglord

                  • Fazoo@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    You should be directing that comment to the dingus who literally claimed every athlete is doping in response to me. Try reading previous comments before acting like a dipshit while deep in the thread. Lol

          • explodicle@local106.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            This mentality is why we should crack down harder, not softer. Cheating is eroding the public’s confidence in fair competition.

        • RuthlessCriticism [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          The United States are the GOATs of state sponsored and planned doping at the Olympics. Many of the involved doctors have talked about it in the decades since the '84 Olympics.

    • StalinwasaGryffindor [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      52
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      Why are we letting the people responsible for Iraq and Afghanistans current state get away with it? Like if the US wants to arrest a war criminal Bush and Cheney are right there. Same for Blair, or Harper, or any of the other architects of the invasions.

      • radiofreeval [she/her]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        41
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Because bourgeoisie law does three things. Firstly it protects capital against individuals. Secondly it protects itself against individuals so it can maintain “order”. Finally, it prevents capital against itself, to prevent it devouring itself in competition or sucking hard enough to create a revolutionary populace. Protecting individuals against each other or against capital is not the purpose of law enforcement, much less protecting people from war criminals. (Btw if anyone can find the parenti lecture this was based off, please tell me because i forget)

      • Antikythera@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m not saying they should get away with it, I’m just saying that we shouldn’t let Russia get away with it because the United States and the UK got away with it. It’s like the Boomer argument that it’s not fair to them for student loans to be forgiven because they had to pay.

            • GarbageShoot [he/him]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              47
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              Do you not understand why I said that? I would not support student loan forgiveness only for white people because, while I like student loan forgiveness, I can recognize that such a program would ultimately just be in the interest of white supremacy. I wouldn’t pull the disingenuous liberal line of “you’ve gotta start somewhere” as though the policy was tethered to some imaginary future state that it is nominally more similar to but practically much further from.

              Likewise, saying “well, at least by holding Belarus to account some countries will be held to account, which gets us closer to all countries being held to account!” is absurd. It promotes western dominance, not the abstract idea of “holding countries to account”. Striking only one side saying that it’s closer to both sides being struck than striking zero sides would be is sophistry.

        • StalinwasaGryffindor [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          27
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m not sure where in the world you live, but for myself, I’m in a western country. It would be far more easy for my country to hold the architects of the Afghanistan invasion to account than Putin. The fact that my government doesn’t indicates that all the talk of punishing Russia has nothing to do with punishing aggression, it’s just about punishing a rival

          • Apollo@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            It’s actually far easier to hold putin to account than western leaders - the western hegemony is hardly going to turn on itself, but it can easily send arms to Ukraine.

            That this arming of ukraine is for completely self interested reasons doesn’t mean it also has the side effect of helping a country fight tyranny. A good thing done for bad reasons can still be a good thing.

            • lad@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              Also, if the western countries will get paid for the help afterwards, that’d be an almost free win

      • PerCarita@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Why are we letting China get away with it? Why are we letting Saudi Arabia get away with it? The IOC is a toaster and it’s like you’re asking it to make you a whole roast dinner. It can’t even make toast properly…

        • StalinwasaGryffindor [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m not asking for anything, I’m just pointing out the hypocrisy in calling for punishing Russia for war crimes when in every respect the US and her vassals have committed and are committing orders of magnitude more violence in the last couple decades

          • PerCarita@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            *his. Come on, the US is not a motherland, it’s a fatherland.

            This is spiraling into whataboutism and I’m disengaging. Have a nice day!

        • Historical_General@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          You realise by targetting an official enemy state of the most powerful of the lot, we’re essentially rewarding them? And making them more powerful on the world stage? So a fixation on CN and RU is inherently going to become counter-productive to goals of stability and human development etc.

    • ShimmeringKoi [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      “Just because we let the world’s most prolific serial killer get away with it doesnt mean he shouldnt be allowed to keep murdering if he pinky swears his victims really deserve it this time.”

      We can’t go back in time and fix it but we’ve got to start somewhere.

      We are in total agreement here, and we can start by seizing the levers of power, purging the government of capitalists, withdrawing all troops from everywhere and using them for reforestation work, dismantling the IMF, paying reparations to every country we’ve victimized, and putting every fossil fuel executive and lobbyist against the wall for their omnicidal crimes against all terrestrial life.

    • space_comrade [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      but we’ve got to start somewhere.

      Somehow we always seem to be starting with US geopolitical enemies, never the US itself, despite literal centuries of heinous crimes.

      Curious how that works.