"Helldivers fans – we’ve heard your feedback on the Helldivers 2 account linking update. The May 6 update, which would have required Steam and PlayStation Network account linking for new players and for current players beginning May 30, will not be moving forward.

We’re still learning what is best for PC players and your feedback has been invaluable. Thanks again for your continued support of Helldivers 2 and we’ll keep you updated on future plans."

  • helenslunch@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    If you buy a proper streaming device instead of an XBOX you will have an identical experience as you would just using your TV.

    As for why, it’s already been explained: there’s a precedent that’s been set that these companies can change the terms of service on you at will (to, for example, show you an ever-increasing frequency of ads or collect your data), and that you can choose to either accept the new terms or throw that shit in the garbage because it is suddenly not functional and it is past the return period.

    Aside from all of that, you can choose what kind of user experience you want, rather than having it chosen for you. Most of the cheap streaming boxes will deliver a better experience than whatever comes on your TV.

    • Guntrigger@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      6 months ago

      If you buy a proper streaming device instead of an XBOX you will have an identical experience as you would just using your TV.

      Got it, so I don’t need to buy a seperate streaming device.

      I get where you’re coming from with the privacy aspects and whatnot, but I very much doubt that a seperate streaming box will get me a better experience than turning on my TV and having Netflix booted in 3 seconds.

      • helenslunch@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        Got it, so I don’t need to buy a seperate streaming device.

        …huh? No, not strictly. I’m just telling you it’s in your best interest.

        I get where you’re coming from with the privacy aspects and whatnot

        I don’t think you do. This is about much more than privacy.

        I very much doubt that a seperate streaming box will get me a better experience than turning on my TV and having Netflix booted in 3 seconds.

        In regards to that specific function, it will likely be identical or better, depending on exactly what streaming box and TV we’re talking about. You can choose to not believe me, but you do so at your own potential peril.

        • Guntrigger@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          6 months ago

          If it’s about more than privacy. Please enlighten me. My whole point is that no-one wants to go out and buy an extra device to perform the same function as the TV they already have with vague hand wavy warnings. If it’s true peril, you’ll be able to explain why.

          To believe you all I would need is like, a YouTube video of someone booting the TV and the device up. Does it need multiple remotes? If so it’s definitely slower. Are we talking Chromecast type dongle? If so, I used one of those on the TV before my Smart TV (purely because there was an app I needed that wasn’t available on Xbox). It was slower, less reliable, worse quality and more of a chore than the Xbox, which in turn is much slower than my current TV.

          • helenslunch@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            If it’s about more than privacy. Please enlighten me.

            It’s about choice. It’s about ads. It’s about control.

            Roku has already begun finding new ways to implement ads by injecting them in while your TV is paused, even when using an external source. They’re also forcing users to agree to forced arbitration or never use their TV again.

            My whole point is that no-one wants to go out and buy an extra device to perform the same function as the TV they already have

            It’s $20 and you can order it and have it delivered to your door.

            with vague hand wavy warnings

            I am being very explicit.

            To believe you all I would need is like, a YouTube video of someone booting the TV and the device up.

            …okay, go for it?

            Does it need multiple remotes?

            I mean that depends on your exact situation and what other devices you have connected but probably not.

            HDMI-CEC has been a thing for a long time. When you turn on the device the TV will detect it and automatically power on and switch the source. When you turn it off, the TV automatically powers “off”. You can also control the volume and I’m sure other things that I don’t use. You really only need the TV remote to configure TV settings.

            • Guntrigger@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              6 months ago

              Roku has already begun

              But I don’t have a Roku TV… someone in here even suggested a Roku streaming device would be better but that makes zero sense.

              It’s $20 and you can order it and have it delivered to your door.

              Yeah, if there was a reason to buy it.

              I am being very explicit.

              About the Roku injection of ads and anti-consumerism. Why would buying a streaming device made by another corporation be any better.

              …okay, go for it?

              I think our wires got crossed, I was asking you for evidence.

              I kind of get the gist of what you’re saying. But I just wanted to understand why there’s a “doom and gloom, down with all Smart TVs” attitude, when a lot of the streaming boxes are still made my these mega corps and could potentially have the same issues.

              • helenslunch@feddit.nl
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                6 months ago

                But I don’t have a Roku TV…

                You’re missing the point. Roku are trailblazers. They are testing the limits of what amount of bullshit their customers will tolerate. If customers tolerate this (which they will), others will certainly follow suit. This doesn’t end with Roku. We’ve seen software and services continually become more and more oppressive across a wide array of platforms and corpos, and still you can’t understand this?

                Yeah, if there was a reason to buy it.

                Moving the goalposts. I’ve already given you several reasons.

                Why would buying a streaming device made by another corporation be any better.

                See above.

                I think our wires got crossed, I was asking you for evidence.

                And I was telling you to go and get it. I am not Google. I am not an LLM. Go ask them.

                when a lot of the streaming boxes are still made my these mega corps and could potentially have the same issues.

                I’ve already explained this. It really just seems like you’re intentionally ignoring my answers in favor of winning an internet argument. I don’t have interest in that sort of discussion, so I won’t be wasting anymore energy. Good luck.

                • Guntrigger@sopuli.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  So let me get this straight, I should not connect my TV of any brand to the Internet for fear they might do something that Roku did? If Roku are trailblazers, why do you think other companies selling streaming boxes won’t also go down that path?

                  Why are streaming boxes safe but not Smart TVs?

                  Why do you think Roku will care that you won’t tolerate them if you are and never were going to be a customer?

                  Moving the goalposts

                  Absolutely ridiculous. This whole thread is about reasons to use it over the native TV. I’m honestly interested. I’ve seen no solid reasoning. [Ignoring that this was a reply to your snark that I can get it delivered instead of “going out” to get one when I was actually asking why I should and you knew I was]

                  It really just seems like you’re intentionally ignoring my answers

                  You’re the one ignoring me! I asked if you’re talking “like a Chromecast” because I have one of those and if that is the kind of device you’re talking about, I can compare 3 different methods of watching anything on my TV that are better in every way.

                  I don’t care to go and buy another similar device without a good reason, and I was simply interested in what the landscape looks like right now.

                  • ysjet@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    6 months ago

                    I’m not sure why you’re getting so aggressive over this, or so defensive about being told to separate your TV from your streaming tools so that if the streaming tools start to suck you can just replace a $20 stream stick instead of a several hundred to several thousand dollar TV you need to calm down and stop being a dick to people trying to politely help you and explain things to you.