• stewie3128@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    58
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    The question of jurisdiction was more complicated than where the crime had been committed.

    So… The US did it.

    • jonne@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      9 months ago

      Ukraine actually did it, but there’s no chance they’d do that without the US giving the go-ahead.

      • CascadeOfLight [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        37
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        9 months ago
        No, it was definitely straight up the US. Ignore any bullshit about yachts and Ukrainian divers.

        Here is the USS Kearsage - one of the only ships in the world with a moon pool that would allow divers to operate at the pipeline’s depth - leaving after “NATO exercises” in the area of the pipeline five days before it exploded

        Here is a USN Boeing P-8A Anti-Submarine plane - one of the only planes in the world that can generate a radio pulse capable of reaching to the depth of the pipeline - flying along the length of the pipeline almost exactly 24 hours before it exploded

        Here is President of the United States Joseph Robinette Biden, stating that the Nord Stream 2 project - which competes with US LNG sales to Europe - will not be allowed to continue; just out of frame is Chancellor of Germany Olaf Scholz, who offers no form of contradiction or rebuttal

        • MonkderZweite@feddit.ch
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          I mean, that US basically owns germany since WW2… has a basis with privileges like an embassy for near east espionage in g… has intelligence programs where g would like to be a closer partner…

        • Milk_Sheikh@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Not disputing you but very interested in reading more and sources - I always was very skeptical the volunteer Ukrainian saboteurs angle

      • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        9 months ago

        From what I have heard it is actually really hard to do, and only a few countries have the capabilities and equipment.

        • jonne@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          9 months ago

          The propaganda says the Russians did it (which is ridiculous, it’s their own pipeline, and they could just shut it down on their end if they wanted to). Either way, there’s no way the US didn’t at least consent to it, and yeah, most likely was more directly involved in it.

          • Maoo [none/use name]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            9 months ago

            Propaganda says both: first that Russia did it, then that Ukraine did it. The former is insulting stupid and the second is more subtle but still makes no logistical sense, as Ukraine lacks the specialized equipment and personnel required. The “Ukraine did it” narrative is one that’s still safer for the NATO bloc group that certainly did it, as even if they acknowledge it as true (which they don’t need to and have avoided doing), it’s easy to brush under the rug as Good Slava Ukraini Resistance.

            This is why these countries doing investigations are mum. They know neither narrative is true.

            • PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              9 months ago

              Lack of any reaction from Germany after the Ukraine version was announced is very telling. You would think they would at least consider to stop gutting their own country to help a country that supposedly did such thing, but nothing happened at all.

      • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        The war hawks answer would be so that we can economically separate russia-germany so that germany is more willing to go against russia. If Germany is dependent on gas from Russia they are less willing to risk their relationship.

      • ikidd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        At the time, Germany was on the fence about sanctions because they were getting gas via the Nordstream from Russia and didn’t want to endanger that. Sudden, completely unexpected lack of gas from Russia = no impediment to backing sanctions. And that’s how it turned out.