• carbonprop@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    10 months ago

    We love getting the refund. After making a concerted effort to install a heat pump myself and purchase an affordable EV it helps pay for about a month’s worth of electricity each time we get it. We don’t consume any carbon based fuels at our home any longer. So it’s a big bonus for us. Next up is solar panels I think.

        • Pxtl@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          I’m aware but I haven’t heard people’s experiences with them. I ask because I’m shopping for water heating right now and debating the expense of getting 240 run to the water heater for a heat pump.

          Electric tankless sounds impossible (yes, I know they exist, I just mean they don’t sound like something that should be able to), since the amount of BTUs required to run a gas tankless at peak is absolutely nuts – tankless gas water-heaters run on 3/4" pipe instead of the normal 1/2" since they need to have so much burst heat. That doesn’t sound possible for electric.

          • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            What kind of usage do you have? We’ve got a 120v 40 gallons tank at our cottage and it’s more than enough for three showers, worst case it takes about an hour to heat the whole tank. My father in law has an 80 gallons unit and he’s never ran out of hot water even with people visiting.

            I don’t understand how people cannot believe that heating things with electricity works well, it’s the norm in Quebec (and anywhere where electricity is cheap really).

            • Auli@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              10 months ago

              Sure where it’s cheap here it would cost more to move to electricity. Yah Alberta Advantage /s

              • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                10 months ago

                My point was more that “Yes, heating your house and water with electricity actually works, the proof is that it’s the norm in many places!”

                It might be cheaper in Alberta for now but the consequences of heating with petrol will be more expensive in the long run, so it’s just shoveling the problem forward…

          • pbjamm@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            10 months ago

            A whole house model will need a 100A circuit to itself. You could install small units in each location that needs hot water but that is also expensive.

            • Pxtl@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              10 months ago

              Holy crap like 24000W of juice on tap. That is not screwing around. Awesome. A neat option but sounds like something for new builds not retrofitting an older home.

              • pbjamm@beehaw.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                10 months ago

                If you have 200a service to your house then it might be an option but lots of houses (including my own) do not have the capacity.

                I really need to upgrade to 200a or get gas heating as my 100a is woefully inadequate when temps are below freezing like now.

              • Victor Villas@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                10 months ago

                If you already haven’t, do check out Technology Connections videos on electrifying, he covers old home challenges quite a bit.

                I was reminded of him because he talks about the possibility of making a 100A circuitry workout with some smart switching

                • Pxtl@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  10 months ago

                  Yeah I love his videos but I hadn’t seen anything about the whole home issue of “omg this is way more power hosue-wide”.

                  The idea of smart switching sounds neat - that would basically mean “you can’t run your dryer and have hot water and charge your car at the same time”, right? But, like, in an automated way not just “it throws the breaker”.

              • pbjamm@beehaw.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                10 months ago

                I mean you could look it up

                A pool and a shower are different applications. If the pool takes all day to warm up it is not much of an issue, but you want the shower to be hot right now.

          • ikidd@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            People that cheer about tankless have never had a tankless. They’re awful. They can’t hold a temperature and are a great way to get scalded then frozen. Tanks are very efficient these days and have none of the usage downfalls, besides being a quarter of the cost.

            • joshhsoj1902@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              10 months ago

              A properly sized natural gas tankless works pretty well.

              Electric tankless on the otherhand take so much power I can’t imagine anyone actually installs them in a home.

            • DerisionConsulting@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              I have a gas tankless, and it works really well. When we moved in, I needed to turn the temperature down to prevent the issue you described; It was set at 65C.
              Tankless systems should be set to 50C/120F, whereas tank systems are supposed to be hotter to prevent Legionnaires’.

            • AnotherDirtyAnglo@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              I’ve had a 50A unit in a 1BR apartment, and it was fine. Enough heat for showers and for someone to do dishes in the kitchen, or the dishwasher to run. You’d need the larger unit for a home with two showers and four people, but in some use cases, it’s really efficient.

    • Auli@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      A month of electricity, won’t even cover that now. If I moved to an EV and electric heating my bill would be more insane then it already is.

      • carbonprop@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        You get to offset gas for your car with less expensive electricity. We save about $100 or more a month in gas. Electric baseboard heating would definitely be expensive. Our oil bill was getting crazy bad, and with the recent inflation it would have been that much worse. Our heat pump keeps things comfortable at home in the winter and summer. If it gets too chilly we can use a space heater as we need. Overall per year we are still saving hundreds going electric.

  • Greyghoster@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    10 months ago

    I’ve noticed in Australia that those who watch Murdock press and other right wing media often don’t think renewable programs are working. There is a concerted push to rubbish any idea that the programs work.

  • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    10 months ago

    Even if it read as “CO2 REB8 LUV FRM JT XX” on bank statements, I don’t think Conservatives would believe it.

      • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        10 months ago

        I did see that chart.

        I also know that Canadian Conservatives and US Republicans are campaigning on “feelings don’t care about facts” this year, so even if they report having received a rebate, they don’t think this incentive is beneficial for both the economy and environment.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    10 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    The quarterly payments go out to every tax-filing adult household in the eight provinces where the federal carbon tax applies: Alberta, Saskatchewan, Manitoba, Ontario, New Brunswick, Nova Scotia, Prince Edward Island and Newfoundland and Labrador.

    Either these folks are actually missing out because they haven’t filed their income taxes, or they’re simply not noticing the money when it arrives, or they’re mistaking it for some other type of payment from the government.

    Underpinning all this is “a failure at the most basic level of retail political communication” by the federal Liberal government about one its flagship policies, says Shachi Kurl, president of the Angus Reid Institute.

    She says that may have been a good strategy in 2019, when Canadians saw climate change as a top priority, but the Liberals have failed to adapt their message to 2024, when the cost of living has become a more pressing concern.

    In 2022, Environment Minister Steven Guilbeault asked Canadian banks to refer to them as climate action incentive payments, which is the official term the federal government uses.

    The money typically goes out on the 15th of January, April, July and October, unless the 15th falls on a Saturday or Sunday or federal holiday, in which case payments are issued on the last business day prior to the 15th.


    The original article contains 1,144 words, the summary contains 209 words. Saved 82%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • Stanwich@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Because Even though my wife has to stay home to look after our disabled son and they go by household income , I make over the amount that gets one. Never get a rebate even though I could really fucking use one.

  • Awatto_boi@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Yes I received a rebate that covers an insignificant fraction of the Carbon taxes that I paid throughout the year.

    • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      10 months ago

      If that’s truly the case then you’re exactly the kind of person that the tax is made for.

      If you’re including a perceived increase in prices in things that’s aren’t petrochemicals then you’re misinformed as the carbon tax accounts for so little of the price increases that it’s not even worth talking about (0.15% of the inflation in 2022 based on a study made by the parliamentary budget officer).

    • blottootto@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      10 months ago

      I’m interested what you spend your money on that’s so Carbon Tax heavy. I live super far North, use 6000l oil to heat my home every year and the rebate I get would cover around 11000l of oil. So 50% of the annual rebate (it’s 4 payments per year btw) covers my heating, and 50% covers driving and indirect costs. I also take advantage of grants and rebates for upgrading my home where I can (I don’t know if they are funded from Carbon Tax though).