When will there be a Kbin Foundation that:

  1. collects and handles money to help build Kbin (right now I don’t see a single “donate” button)
  2. owns any property of Kbin (like domain and git), so that the board of the foundation can decide what’s done with it if ernest kicks the bucket or goes insane
  3. has a board that can make decisions about Kbin to spread power from one person to many?

@ernest
I don’t even know how pinging works :)

I’ll gladly become a donor when I see that Kbin will not be a one-guy-show for long, but a serious project that will outlive it’s creator. If ernest is not actively planning to have this project live even without himself, then I bet it’s not going to last.

Please comment any thoughts you have, and have a nice summer!

    • Packopus@kbin.social
      3·
      1 year ago

      @static “I don’t even know how pinging works :)”

      So for non-techy dude that sounds more business oriente in their question, I can clarify that everything that kbin is or can be is public code that anybody can copy and build from. It’s duplicated already by everyone that makes their own instance, and people can make their own edits. for #1, it’s all donation. #2, it’s all what ernest can churn out before he croaks or gets bored but kbin is just a bin of code that everyone can toss into, there is no singular domain to own. #3 every instance has their own power over their site. It’s like Wordpress. Wordpress is the source code to make things easier on the website builder. Kbin is just the website builder like WordPress. What users make of it is up to them and doesn’t require a board for each website to be made. We (the user) can request changes that get voted on by other users and can be implemented or not if someone knows how to contribute the code.

      @ernest @mmaramara

      • static@kbin.social
        2·
        1 year ago

        So for non-techy dude that sounds more business oriente in their question, I can clarify that everything that kbin is or can be is public code that anybody can copy and build from.

        Correct.

        In the long term more stability like a foundation would be best, but I think Ernest needs some time for that, and we have time.

      • mmaramara@kbin.socialOP
        1·
        1 year ago

        kbin is just a bin of code that everyone can toss into, there is no singular domain to own.

        There is kbin.pub and the main branch git. Just because forks can continue working if the main kbin git gets messed up, compromised or whatever, it doesn’t mean that the development wouldn’t be in serious trouble in the real life. It would be far from smooth

  • minnieo@kbin.social
    4·
    1 year ago

    other comments already answered a big part of this, but i dont think id want some foundation or group of certain people in power of kbin and in power of who has power over kbin, that defeats the purpose of a decentralized platform doesnt it? if this instance gets bad, we migrate to another one, we dont need to abandon the entire platform like with centralized platforms like reddit.

    • mmaramara@kbin.socialOP
      2·
      1 year ago

      I don’t think you get my point. I’m not advocating to relicense kbin code or make it closed. Everyone will always be free to fork and make their own kbin-like client if they’re unhappy with the original. I’m also not suggesting taking kbin off Fediverse.

      Right now, I think only 1 person has complete power over the domain kbin.pub, and the git repository. So that is as centralized as it gets. Same thing with the kbin.social instance, but I’d like to keep administration of the kbin project sepatate from the kbin.social fediverse instance (both can live without the other). I’d like the current main kbin client project (the only?) to get proper administration and financing.