It’s insane the lengths that some people will go to save a few seconds on their commute, while also endangering others.

  • Awoo [she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Ok so what do you expect to happen when you rock up to the council and say “Hi, I want to replace this speed camera making tens of thousands in profit per year with this other solution that makes no money at all” ?

    Please tell me what you think the pathway to the alternative better solution is.

    • mondoman712@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      I wouldn’t replace it. Some people will still speed even with traffic calming so the camera is still useful.

      If you want to reduce the council’s income from speed cameras, the first thing would be to elect a central government that will properly fund local councils so they have the budget to make decisions like that.

      • Awoo [she/her]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        You physically can’t speed with traffic calming, they will just crash and fuck up their vehicles.

        This conversation is silly. Right from the start if you were committed to this fuck the poor nonsense you should have just been honest and admitted it so neither of our times would have been wasted on this ridiculous farce.

        Not really that surprised, typical liberal bullshit. Gonna vote Starmer too yeah?

        • mondoman712@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          I’m not a lib, I’m not a fan of Keith, and I’m not saying “fuck the poor”. Poor people are the most impacted by car dependency which is perpetuated by dangerous driving. If you don’t want to have this conversation anymore you can stop replying.