• Dead_or_Alive@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    77
    ·
    1 year ago

    Sucks to be on the wrong side of history. No one wants to loose their communities, property or livelihoods. However the Jews had a claim to the area going back thousands of years and they needed to go somewhere.

    There were many Jewish communities across the Middle East prior to the 1940s that no longer exist anymore either. I wonder who pushed them out… do they get the same sentiment from your bleeding heart?

    There have been two state solutions on the table with Jerusalem as the Palestinian capital on the table multiple times. Palestinians turned every one of them down. Instead of building their own state they will be further pushed out of Gaza. Where they go is anyones guess no one wants them, especially other Muslim states.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Two-state_solution

    • MindSkipperBro12@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Who the fuck cares about a claim from thousands of years ago? Can you even count how many Greats you would have to add to even reach your goat herder of a grandpa back when Jesus was still around?

      This is just trying to revive a dead dream and we all get to suffer for it.

      • SkippingRelax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s what drives me crazy about dated religions and ultra nationalism. We could have flying cars if people stopped with this shit

      • bartolomeo@suppo.fi
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t really get the logic: is an older claim or a more recent claim to land “more valid”?

        • MindSkipperBro12@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          A recent claim is better. I care about the partitioning of the lands with the Sykes Picot Agreement, I don’t care about some inbred king of sandland did back in 147AD.

          • trafficnab@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Wouldn’t this mean that the millions of Israelis born in Israel over the last 80 years probably have the strongest claim to the land (at least the internationally recognized 1967 borders anyway)? 1916 is not particularly recent

    • SkippingRelax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah i think a couple of Neanderthals descendants have claims that go back tens of thousands of years. do they get the same sentiment from your bleeding hearth?

      Also my cousin has Etruscan blood, should he kick Italians out of Italy as he has a claim that goes back TWO thousands years and he’s got nowhere to go since his wife kicked him out?

      • Dead_or_Alive@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        Does your friend have superior weaponry and the backing of major world powers? If no then he should probably live in peace in modern unified Italy.

        • SkippingRelax@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          So those claims you talked about are just bullshit and it’s just about i want the land and am stronger so I just grab it. Fair enough you could have made it clear sooner so we wouldn’t all waste time pretending. While we are at it putin is also good for you isn’t it?

          • Dead_or_Alive@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            No Putin and Hamas are cut from the same cloth. Both are aggressors.

            I fully support Ukraine and hope we ship them all the weapons they ask for. I hope they regain all the territory they lost and wipe Russia from the map. But at the same time if they are not able to secure the lands they lost I hope they have sense enough to know when to compromise.

            The Palestinian leadership has displayed no such common sense as of yet.

    • bufalo1973@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Now imagine a civil war begins in the US. Both sides get too weak. And then the Cherokee, Apache, … receive all the military help they need from, let’s say, China. And they start killing “every non Nation person” because “that was our land”. Would you say that’s right and that all and every white/black/Asian person deserve it?

    • hark@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s funny that you think you’re on the right side of history for supporting a genocidal ethnostate.

      • Dead_or_Alive@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I guess we’ll see in 50 years which nation still exists.

        Looks at all of Palestine’s immediate neighbors in the Middle East who won’t even lift a finger to even admit refugees.

        I think I know where I’ll put my money.

        • hark@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Might makes right, huh? I already know Palestine will be completely ethnically cleansed and then israel will move onto taking parts of Syria and other countries in their goal of lebensraum. That doesn’t mean it’s morally right.

          • Dead_or_Alive@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            You either didn’t read my comment from earlier in the thread or you enjoy trying to frame an argument.

            I’ll post it below for you to read and educate yourself.

            There have been two state solutions on the table with Jerusalem as the Palestinian capital on the table multiple times. Palestinians turned every one of them down. Instead of building their own state they will be further pushed out of Gaza. Where they go is anyones guess no one wants them, especially other Muslim states.

            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Two-state_solution

            TLDR: Palestine will be wiped of the map unless they choose a different path. Israel isn’t going anywhere.

            • hark@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              The negotiations were argued in bad faith. Israel would put forth ridiculous demands and then lay the blame on Palestine for rejecting them. Why do you think Palestinians are being pushed out of Gaza and have been continually and constantly pushed out for decades? There was never a sincere effort for a two-state solution.

              Nobody wants to take on many refugees all at once, it’s very difficult to manage. Why do you think Britain “volunteered” Palestinian land to relocate Jews out of Europe? It wasn’t out of the goodness of their heart.

              • dubyakay@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                No response to this of course. Don’t even expect one. They are currently with their fingers in their ears yelling “LALALLALALALA”

                • Sambarkjand@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  There’s literally a response just below yours, but of course taking the time to make sure you’re actually right is never a strong point for you people.

                  I personally find it very funny that the pro-Palestinian go-to is that none of the offers Israel made for a 2 state solution were ‘realistic’ or ‘serious’ or ‘good faith’. No one doubts that there were offers. Tell me, in what other scenario in all of human history do the losers of a war (that they started) get to dictate the terms of their surrender?

      • Sambarkjand@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        What’s the ethnic makeup of Israel? What’s the ethnic makeup of Palestine? Which one is closer to the definition of an ethno state? Do words not mean anything to you?

        • hark@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          You’re granted citizenship automatically if you’re Jewish and you get a free trip to go there. Being Jewish grants one special privileges. The country is based entirely on ethnicity and was established with that as a core principle. If it’s not technically considered an ethnostate, it’s about the closest that a country can be one without being one in that case.