• queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    Français
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Personal property is for personal use. That’s it.

    Once you start to accumulate surplus property then its very obviously not personal anymore. A person that doesn’t want a garden won’t have one to sell you, because they wouldn’t have one in the first place.

    Don’t think in terms of “right” and “wrong”. Think materially.

    • ciko22i3@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      Français
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      what if their father left them the garden and they want to sell it to me? what if they want to move somewhere else and they decide to sell me their property?

      • Squizzy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        Français
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        Inheritance is antithetical to meritocracy is the basis for generational wealth and capitalist dynasties.

        Everything must go, use it lose it.

        • ciko22i3@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          Français
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          1 year ago

          What even is your motivation to do more than the bare minimum to survive if not to leave it to your children? I would rather take care of my kids future than let some corrupt government do it who will prioritize their children over mine

            • yeather@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              Français
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              1 year ago

              In the entirety of human history communism has never worked. Not once has any society been able to work on the ideals of it.

              • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                Français
                arrow-up
                10
                arrow-down
                9
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Yeah, because the US bombs them or funds terror cells or blockades their economy.

                Cold War. Communism was hunted and destroyed whereever it arose.

                • yeather@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  Français
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  If communism was so strong it wouldn’t have to worry about capitalist intervention. You just proved my point of communism / socialism being weak if the apparent enemy is easily able to wreck you economy and implode your country it is not a strong system.

              • Squizzy@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                Français
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                It’s impossible to uncouple society from capitalism. It’s not a possibility, but it definitely could work. Maybe capitalism just needs longer than communism to fail?

                The wealthiest country in the world has unaffordable healthcare and homelessness, how is that capitalism working?

          • Squizzy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            Français
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            So what are all those people without kids doing?

            Make a better world, build a stronger economy for them excel in and make their own way. I plan on providing the very best for my children to let them go about their life as they see fit and not have to rely on something I might pass down.

            Corrupt governments is a cop out statement too, ideally you wouldn’t stand for government corruption.

      • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        Français
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        16
        ·
        1 year ago

        A person who could actually assemble a farm through small land acquisitions through the power of friendship probably deserves it tbh

          • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            Français
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            11
            ·
            1 year ago

            You’re talking about using your personal connections within the community to slowly assemble a farm from small acquisitions like their deceased father’s garden and then leveraging those connections to find people to help you work the land. People that don’t need to give you their land and don’t need to work your land, they’re actually choosing to do it freely. That’d actually be amazing if it ever happened.

            That basically has zero relation with how farms work under capitalism.

              • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                Français
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                7
                ·
                1 year ago

                Except they don’t need money, so it’s still a free choice they’re making.

                When you don’t need money to have a life worth living and all needs are already provided, any choice to work for money is a free one.

      • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        Français
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        The democratically elected central committee, or some other process whereby everyone decides together what our fair share is.