“The team had remained unusually mum and secretive about his status, even after general manager Kyle Davidson held a news conference Saturday. Davidson is expected to hold another news conference Tuesday afternoon.”
That’s the only other information I was able to find; that’s from the ‘Chigago Sun Times’
Why is it funny? If the union/lawyers/contracts are involved, there’s plenty of reasons not to blab to the press. This doesn’t seem like a “but the public has a right to know!” issue, so not sure why finding gossip disgusting would be funny.
“The team had remained unusually mum and secretive about his status, even after general manager Kyle Davidson held a news conference Saturday. Davidson is expected to hold another news conference Tuesday afternoon.”
That’s the only other information I was able to find; that’s from the ‘Chigago Sun Times’
I think it’s funny they’re being intentionally obtuse in answering questions and then describe people’s speculation as “disgusting”
Why is it funny? If the union/lawyers/contracts are involved, there’s plenty of reasons not to blab to the press. This doesn’t seem like a “but the public has a right to know!” issue, so not sure why finding gossip disgusting would be funny.
Because they’re being intentionally vague in their responses. What else would you expect from people when you don’t answer their questions?
It does involve one other person though and that person has a right to their privacy.
“We fired Bob.”
“Why?”
“You’ll need to wait until we’re ready to release more information.”
“That’s understandable. It doesn’t really concern me anyways, I was just being nosy.”