• ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    113
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    So the article explains that official tournaments use a unique words list that contains a lot of generous words like “zzz” and “aa”. Mostly intended to allow high scoring words for people who studied their list.

    The company that maintains the list has added a lot more of these “not a real word but it scores high so we added it” words.

    For some highlight words from the article: MIREPOIXS, HORSEFEATHERSES, SUBSPECIESES, GRATINEEED

    Players are complaining that high level tournaments are basically going to be competitions for who knows the most gibberish from the tournament word list and it is alienating the general population from joining tournaments and scrabble clubs.

    • Sanctus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Shouldn’t the official word list just be the dictionary? Isn’t that the point?

      • loudambiance@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Which dictionary? Merriam Webster added almost 700 “words” this year, including shit like: TTYL, finsta, bussin, cromulent, doggo, simp, goated, and more. I feel like they are slowly becoming urbandictionary.com.

        • kakes@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          37
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          I mean, their job is to provide definitions for the words people use in language, not to gatekeep what words are “good enough” to be defined.

          I hear each of the words you’ve listed all the time, they’re part of our language whether we like it or not.

          • loudambiance@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            10 months ago

            My point was more about which dictionary do you use and less about the exact words added. Webster added them, but Oxford and American Heritage didn’t.

              • kakes@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                10 months ago

                Now I want to play a game of scrabble where you play a complete nonsense word, and your points are the number of Google results for that word - lowest points wins. And maybe you have 5 letters instead of 7.

        • merc@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          10 months ago

          Modern dictionaries are descriptive not prescriptive. They don’t tell you how things should be spelled, or what meaning they should have. Instead, they report how things are spelled and what people think they mean in the real world.

        • RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          I knew Meriiam Webster was going to shit when they added “literally” as “figuratively” because people use it facetiously.

          • Ookami38@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            That’s the point of it, though. People use “literally” as "figuratively, and it should be recorded as such. It doesn’t matter that it’s facetious or ironic, it’s still used that way commonly.

    • Rogue@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      10 months ago

      I’m pretty sure the tournaments are just memorising lists. A man won the French competition without being able to speak French… He just memorised the accepted words.

    • merc@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      10 months ago

      Words in scrabble should be things that people actually use outside scrabble. It’s fair if that makes some leeway for slang. It’s also fair if it means that some really obscure words that nobody really uses get in. But, this seems over the line because they’re taking words that nobody uses, and tacking on un-grammatical endings.

    • JoBo@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      The 10x number of new words added compared to previous editions, and the nonsensical nature of so many of the new entries, says it has to be AI. There’s no way some of those would make it past a human editor (except one lazily accepting everything the AI suggests as truth).