Seriously I’m so confused on this. The USA has a 2 party system. You either vote for Biden or you get Trump. Abstaining from the vote you get Trump. MAGA will have a 100% turnout for their God Emperor.

Trump supports Israel 100%. Again, by not voting for Biden the reality is you’re voting for Trump who is even more supportive of Israel and will also attempt to upend democracy in the west.

You don’t have any options here that support Palestine. The reality of the situation is you either get Biden or Trump and the latter is infinitely worse for the ideal you’re trying to uphold by abstaining. That’s how politics work in the US. You might not like it, it sucks, but unfortunately that’s just the way things work.

CMV

  • Jaysyn@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    60
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    100% agree. People saying this are either GOP shills or people that don’t understand how math & game theory work in relation to FPtP voting & think they can make a 3rd party happen if they want it badly enough.

    • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      53
      ·
      1 year ago

      People saying this are either GOP shills or people that don’t understand how math & game theory work

      false dichotomy. i understand math and game theory, and neither of them change whether i’m going to vote for genocide. i’m also not a gop shill, but i would be, because i need the fuckin money.

        • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          48
          ·
          1 year ago

          no, I’m voting against genocide. only by voting for Democrats or Republicans are you voting for genocide, as this post makes so abundantly clear.

          • somePotato@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            35
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Refusing to make a choice is still a choice.

            The only options are: status quo that doesn’t do the bare minimum against genocide, or an actual fascist who is literally promising to do more genocide.

            Yes I know that both options are terrible and the system is fucking garbage, but if you refuse to vote for the lesser evil you’re not taking some moral high road, you’re just enabling the worst evil

            • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              24
              ·
              1 year ago

              Refusing to make a choice is still a choice.

              if the choice i’m making is “not endorsing a genocidal president” then i can live with that. i couldn’t live with myself if i did endorse genocide.

              • somePotato@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                13
                ·
                1 year ago

                Again

                Yes I know that both options are terrible and the system is fucking garbage, but if you refuse to vote for the lesser evil you’re not taking some moral high road, you’re just enabling the worst evil

            • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              23
              ·
              1 year ago

              The only options are: status quo that doesn’t do the bare minimum against genocide, or an actual fascist who is literally promising to do more genocide.

              i expect to have at least 4 names on my ballot. i don’t need to pick one of your favorite teams.

              • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                9
                ·
                1 year ago

                Do any of those names have a snowballs chance in hell to prevent Trump or Biden from winning the election?

                In the real world, I mean, not in your imaginary perfect world.

          • tburkhol@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            18
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Some people will refuse to pull the lever to divert the trolley from killing 10 people, because pulling the lever kills 1.

              • solomoncaygnuyou@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                16
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                I don’t think anyone in this thread is saying that you aren’t making the choice to not let someone die.

                People are just expecting you to be able to handle being asked, “Why did you let 10 people die when there was an option for you to only let 1 person die instead?”

                The trolley being on the warpath isn’t your fault; but you did have the option to reduce the number of deaths by taking action. Through your choice, an objectively larger number of people suffered, died, or lost a loved one. And for some actual reason you didn’t pull the lever other than “I’m not a murderer.”

                We understand you aren’t a murderer. You aren’t intending to hurt anyone. But through your action, you can reduce the number of people murdered. Don’t be surprised when people are confused at your lack of rationale.

                • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  15
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  “Why did you let 10 people die when there was an option for you to only let 1 person die instead?”

                  that’s not really the choice. the choice is let 10 people die or murder one person.

                • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  16
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Don’t be surprised when people are confused at your lack of rationale.

                  i’m being fully rational about this for any deontological viewpoint. if you disagree with deontological ethics, then we have nothing to discuss: i don’t care to try to convince you you’re wrong, and i’ve heard all the arguments you can summon.

          • gullible@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            1 year ago

            I remember 2016 and the dialogue around the election fairly well, and this feels nostalgic. “Maybe he won’t be so bad”* is coming after trump is elected.
            *Editors note: he will be