It is the kind of quality that will get you far, as a cop, I imagine. that, and not asking too many questions.

They’ll make a documentary about him, where the overriding theme is that we all have something to lose. in a few years, maybe.

I’m guessing they didn’t bribe everybody with baked goods?

Somebody should create a page for Green Mario. might fly under the radar until some snitch squeals.

While they make money off the diversion.

the link has already been disproven. It would be interesting to see if these idiots can pass a first grade science class.

So… I wonder… about the sole texture…

what would happen if you increased the thickness of the sole, and then had zero solid layers on bottom to create easy tread. I’m thinking a few layers of dense gyroid, then solid to layers above it.

Or if you wanted even more cushion… a few layers of tread with a couple solid layers, then more infill, and solid top players?

if you think that might work… i’d suggest just doing a very thin print to check it out. (Like, the tread and maybe the insole of just the toe?) it might need tweaking. especially if you add an air-cushion layer.

edit: i know prusa slicer has ways of changing infill percentages etc as a function of layer height, and I would assume most slicers do these days. Another setting to look at changing for tread would be the extrusion width, juicing the infill extrusion width should make the more sturdy, whatever pattern you do select for it.

gyroid would create a squiggly patter on the bottom of it. hex might be interesting too, or maybe hilbert curve, which is ‘space filling’ fractals. Gyroid would be interesting for any cushion section because it would create two large pockets of air instead of many small pockets.

I would suggest air holes, to prevent sweaty feet (and massive chaffing.) (if it’s TPU and thin enough, you can probably add them with some leather punches, mind.)

Unless your goal is a shoe for jumping in mud puddles?

That’s just like, the new-hire complex. This guy doesn’t actually walk around where there’s traps and shit.

Dying in a pit with spears at the bottom is not cool, and accidents happen.

Nope. There were some parts where the press-lady asked him some questions. Which he promptly ignored.

That doesn’t mean this backpack was the backpack he carried.

I hope it’s not someone trolling the cops. That just gets them wrapped up in it and possibly cops looking at them as more evidence.

you, uh, know they still make the yellow pages? you can get one yourself.

Also, who ones what property is generally public information. It’s difficult to imagine, however, how you owning a certain proprety can be used as evidence, for example, in the killing of an asshole insurance ceo.

Your photograph could be used to link you to that, however.

Also, while it’s reasonable to assume the cops have done due diligence on that guy they keep flashing around. But also, it’s reasonable to take a step back and ask “how do they know”. There’s a non-zero chance that guy just popped up on a city-owned surveillance camera and popped on facial rec’ because he has similar eyebrows.

There’s two massive issues at play with facial recognition. the first is that it’s rather far from perfect- especially on shitty and grainy security cameras and the algorithm doesn’t get to say “uh, I don’t know”. it’s expected to give a “yes/no” answer (even if they try to soften it with a percentage probability… it’s used as a yes-no/) . The second is that cops (and people in general) almost always assume the aglo is right.

So it’s entirely possible that the guy in the photo is completely uninvolved.

As for how this is relevant? they need to have photographs to match to; or fingerprints. or DNA. (though they could just as easily use your cousin’s… Yeah. you know those DNA ancestry kits you got for xmas? they fucked you over with those.)

If they had a name, they’d probably already have the person it belongs to in custody.

If those were his items, and his dna on those items, sure. Iirc, this is how they got the BTK killer- a familial match.

Or keep it to low heat. Even better, “no heat” if you can just tumble dry.

Also, wash it on cold.

If I could afford it, I’d get the guy a lifetime, all you can eat, supply of hamberders and fries.

It’s the only way I can think of to off the guy and not go to jail.

So… you don’t need to find caves. Just bring some excavators, and some prefab-structures and bury them.

This would then let you set up some place with useful resources (light for solar power, ice for drinking and stuff.

Personally, though, I vote we send Musk to the other Sister Planet. The one that’s full-on angry-goth-girl, complete with the sulphuric acid. Don’t judge, as far as planets go, she’s freaking hot.

…. But they’re anal retentive. You really don’t want to tickle that sphincter. Most have been holding since the 80’s

Gun violence, too.

Abbot is a limp chode

he should fuck off to someplace that doesn’t have internet so we can forget about him.

Uhm. This is why historical context is incredibly important when talking about these things.

Jesus was the son of a carpenter. he wasn’t exactly wealthy, by any means. He certainly didn’t have the resources to take a trip to India to study anything- such a trip would have taken at least a year just to travel.

He was raised in the Jewish tradition and taught their religious teachings, which, most certainly did not include the philosophies of other religions. Suffice it to say, that Jesus was thoroughly Jewish his both his understanding of the world about him, and how he expressed that understanding.

Further to the point, when jesus was at what we now call “the last supper”… he was not speaking to a bunch of Hindus. he was speaking to a bunch of Jewish men. Even if he had been aware that Hindus exist at all- never mind having studied their teachings and philosophies- he wouldn’t be relating such in that place at that time.

When he says “this is my body” or however you want to translate that, he meant it to be a more literal symbolism than you ascribe. in jewish tradition, when an animal was brought to the temple for sacrifice, it was common for only a small part of that animal to be burned at the altar. the rest of that animal was then divided between the priests and the petitioner (or it went entirely to the priests, or it was the less-common sort that was entirely burned. it depends on the reason for the sacrifice).

he was speaking to jewish men. He was establishing a new sort of sacrificial offering (the right of communion.) and while the disciples didn’t fully understand what he meant, they figured it out pretty damn quickly. he was saying he’s the ‘final’ sacrifice, and therefore- as part of the ritual offering- his followers were to symbolically consume his flesh and blood.

now Catholics take that a step further and follow a doctrine that says the communion bread and wine literally become such during the right (it’s called ‘transubstantiation’). But he was ultimately talking about how he was a sacrifice and he was establishing a new sort of ritual for his followers.

This was an echo of already-established jewish tradition. he wasn’t drawing on hindu or hopi or any one else’s teachings. he was drawing on jewish tradition surrounding sacrificial offerings and echoing that. because he and his followers were jewish.