Consumers are paying more than ever for streaming TV each month and analysts say there’s no reason for the companies to stop raising prices::Finding new subscribers in a saturated streaming video market isn’t easy. And with legacy media companies desperate to recoup revenue declines in their linear TV businesses, the cost of your monthly plan is likely to keep rising.

    • Kadaj21@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah I don’t have the budget to subscribe to multiple streaming services, let alone cable or even one service. Thank god there’s not a lot I’d want to watch…even if sailing high seas.

  • Sanyanov@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    130
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Streaming:

    -Charges you unreasonable amount of money

    -If you cancel the subscription, you lose it all

    -If they change the terms, you may lose access to some of the things in your library

    Torrent:

    -Costs a grand total of 0$

    -Allows you to retain content for eternity

    -Requires a 5 second effort to enter the name of a show/film in Sonarr/Radarr

    The choice is clear.

    • TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      lol I’m like 20 clicks into Sonarr’s website and I still cant find a simple answer: what is Sonarr?

      • Sanyanov@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        1 year ago

        Some sites just assume you know. In short, thing that automates and streamlines series piracy. Radarr is for films, Lidarr for music, Readarr for book, Whisparr for porn, Prowlarr allows to better manage sources for all of the above.

      • BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Agreed. I found it a bit disappointing they skipped to the highlights without describing the big picture first. This is from their GitHub:

        Sonarr is a PVR for Usenet and BitTorrent users. It can monitor multiple RSS feeds for new episodes of your favorite shows and will grab, sort and rename them. It can also be configured to automatically upgrade the quality of files already downloaded when a better quality format becomes available.

        • TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Took a buttload of Googling to just figure out what PVR stands for lol… and I’m still not sure I got it right. Seems like it’s Personal Video Recording??

    • crackajack@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      My main gripe with torrent is that there isn’t always a seeder available. This is a major issue if you’re looking for a movie that isn’t mainstream. There are pirate streaming services but we know that the quality is not usually great. Even if you download from torrent, the quality is not also always great either. I definitely noticed difference in video and sound quality between torrent and what you get from “mainstream” sources. Some torrent say they’re 4k or HD quality, but many files are actually cropped so that uploading and downloading is faster.

      Edit: Grammar and wording

      • NightAuthor@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’ve got a setup that has gradually improved over the years, I have put a few hundred $$ in that time too.

        But, it was fairly easy to get started, my improvements have made the automatic downloads very consistently high quality, and sonarr/radarr do all the searching and filtering for me.

        My wife wanted to watch some Winnie the Pooh, within like 5 minutes the first season was ready to watch, and the rest was finished downloading and ready before the 1 episode was over.

        And it only took 5 minutes because I had to help the searcher bc all my auto filters are optimized for recent releases. Though I’m gonna set up some filters for older stuff, so it’s not trying to download a 4K hdr file for something that came out 50 years ago and was never remastered to 4K.

    • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      arrow-down
      56
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Torrent:

      -Unless your a millennial with really good memory… requires a (usually) a good paid VPN + 3 hours of reading and setup so you dont get nasty letters from your ISP.

      -Requires requisite ports and knowledge of how to get the shows to your TV

      -ideally requires a standalone PC, which most households no longer have

      -Requires knowledge of additional programs that need to be researched and have paid competition

      -Requires knowledge of how to find the source material, with huge gatekeeping between source pools

      I am probably forgetting other stuff, especially for Gen Z and now the oldest Gen Alpha. But if I as a millennial feel it’s a burden to relearn the steps for something I already was doing a decade or so ago. That must be a massive bar for someone who never had their hand in it, so to speak.

      I am not saying it’s impossible, just I haven’t found a straight forward guide from beginning to end, with all the new technology included. And the first time they get a love note from their ISP, they will likely just stop.

      Edit: The vastly different responses with different solutions, only proves to me that this is more complex than people let on. You have some people giving services that weren’t mentioned in the OP in euros (not that there is anything wrong with Europe, just a different experience. Do EU IPs even send love notes? Then you get a mix of people saying what the best VPN is and other people saying you don’t even need a VPN. Just so much different information, is it surprising that people could feel overwhelmed?

      • Kit@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        35
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        This is the age of information. It would take a grand total of a few hours for the average person to watch a video to give them all the knowledge they need to avoid the pitfalls you listed.

        • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          21
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          People are afraid and lazy, it’s easy to let fear control your decisions.

          I think the age of information has passed. If you try googling/search engine any of this you get scraps of information that don’t tie well together.

          All I am saying is I could see people throwing up their hands and thinking it’s too confusing or dangerous.

        • Katana314@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Information is everywhere, but so is misinformation now. There’s LOTS of AI-generated articles out there telling people nothing helpful, or straight-up incorrect answers from Google searches.

      • reddit_sux@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago
        • VPN is easy especially the good paid ones.
        • You can use VPN and torrent on your mobile and cast it there are apps for it. Or you can use one of the NAS which will do it for you no need to remember anything.
        • You needn’t use a PC.
      • Specal@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        So you are mostly wrong here, I’ll let you know my setup that costs me $15 a month.

        A 4 core 8GB VPS: $5 a month. Unlimited cloud Storage: €10 a month.

        I have Emby (Use jellyfin, I haven’t changed out of laziness), Sonarr, Radarr, Jellyseerr all running on a VPS with caddy running a reverse_proxy to point a domain at emby via HTTPS.

        No need for VPNs, but you can run OpenVPN on your VPS for maximum value for money if you want to use a high speed VPN.

        It’s all very straight forward to setup on Ubuntu 20.04 with lots of documentation. My server has been up for 3 months now and I have had 0 issues, friends use jellyseerr to requests shows and movies. Everything else is automated. Can even import lists from IMDb.

        Make sure if you want to save space to use h.265 encoding where possible. Additionally, if you don’t want to torrent you can use newservers. But that will cost an additional $10 a month.

        • TORFdot0@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          Where are you getting a 4 core 8GB VPS for $5 a month with unlimited bandwidth/CPU time?

          All the reputable providers have 1GB, single core shared compute for that price.

          • Specal@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Ionos, but I have been grandfathered in with price so you won’t be able to get my deal

          • TORFdot0@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            AWS/GCP is an order of magnitude more expensive for those specs. And they would ban you for downloading copyrighted material without a VPN. So I wouldn’t recommend that. I was able to get a similar set up using Linode but the specs were way worse and I couldn’t do transcoding, and I didn’t torrent using the $5 a month VPS.

            • Specal@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              It depends on what hardware the host is using, my VPS is capable of transcoding around 4 streams simultaneously.

      • Sanyanov@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        The skill issues related to piracy can and should be addressed. This is how we form a truly strong resistance to the madness that is going on.

        Your point is valid and it’s important to work it through.

      • retrieval4558@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        The knowledge is extremely easy to obtain though. There are lots of very detailed guides. It’s not extremely complex, anyway.

        • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s just hard to know what information even correctly pertains to me. My comment received a half dozen other comments… some seemingly from the US, others from the EU. Some comments saying every house has a PC (not true) others saying a PC isn’t even necessary. Some comments with how to find a good VPN, other comments saying a VPN isn’t even necessary. Then I got recommendations for a half dozen different services from various comments with no idea if they are all necessary and how they interact with each other.

          It may not be extremely complex, but until you get your feet wet, it sure seems like it is. In my day you downloaded what you wanted off of Kazaa or BearShare or the like and then watched it on your PC with VLC. or if you were really fancy you burned it on CDS or DVDS. Then when the bad emails or letters came in, you just told your parents it was the neighbors.

      • jack@monero.town
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Good points, there should be an all-in-one solution which very easily guides you through all the necessary steps

        • DeadlineX@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          My sister, my mother, and my brother all have laptop-exclusive households. Most people these days don’t see a need for a standalone pc when they have a laptop they can take from room to room and costs the same as a desktop.

            • DeadlineX@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I know. I said standalone pc to fit the earlier commenter’s point. Desktop would have been the correct choice, but I figured the gist got across. If it was unclear to anybody, I apologize.

              • Specal@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                No need to apologise I just wanted to clear things up for anyone reading the thread.

              • flynnguy@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                You can do everything you need to do on an old laptop… you don’t need a desktop. You just need to make sure you disable any of the power saving settings so it can stay on all the time but then enable a display-off type of screen saver.

                • DeadlineX@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I don’t think most people have an extra laptop sitting around their home. And they definitely aren’t gonna want to do that to their daily driver.

                  I just don’t think this is feasible for the average person.

            • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              That’s being very pedantic, if you start typing in Laptop V, it autofills PC on searches. Many homes don’t have a desktop, you can do 90% of what you need on mobile nowadays and the other 10% can be done on a laptop.

              • foggenbooty@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                1 year ago

                I don’t think it’s being pedantic in this case. They’re talking about the capabilities of a PC vs something like a mobile phone or a tablet. In this case a laptop is a PC and is fully capable of doing all the things described in this thread.

      • Lightor@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I mean, most of this is wrong?

        What are you reading for 3 hours about a VPN?

        Why do you need to know about ports? You can literally put shows on a flash drive and plug it in.

        A stand alone PC, why? What? Hell I torrent from my phone sometimes.

        A lot of this can be done, but this is not the bar for entry by any means.

      • Rolling Resistance@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s not hard. Mullvad is €5/month. In torrent client, set up Mullvad proxy. Go to thepiratebay or any other tracker to download. Watch.

        You can also do it on your old laptop and use it as a home media server. Android TV can access network shares, I’m sure some of the others can too.

      • CancerMancer@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Piracy is a service and pricing issue. Plenty of people willing to pay, proven by the fact the streaming services were so successful in the first place. They’re just not willing to take substantial pay hikes when they’re going hungry.

        • helenslunch@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          32
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          No, piracy is an entitlement issue.

          Streaming services are still successful, that’s why they’re able to raise the prices. But most of them have been operating at a loss for a long long time to drive user adoption. This is the part where people have to decide if they’re willing to pay what it actually costs.

          You are not entitled to this media. These companies don’t owe you anything.

          • gohixo9650@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            boo-hoo-hoo poor mega corps, I’m pretty sure the CEOs of these companies were paying by their own money the price difference of the true cost and the decreased subscription price of all the customers and they will walk out poorer. Not with millions in their pockets.

            • helenslunch@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              1 year ago

              boo-hoo-hoo poor mega corps

              I’m genuinely baffled that you interpreted any of what I said as garnering sympathy for streaming platforms or their CEOs. They don’t need your sympathy, nor does it have anything to do with what I said.

              • gohixo9650@discuss.tchncs.de
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                I’m genuinely baffled that you interpreted any of what I said as garnering sympathy for streaming platforms or their CEOs.

                then explain me why you mentioned the “operating at a loss” thing. What does it prove in your argument? What does this offer in the dialog and please explain me if the CEO of a said company which is “operating at a loss” walks out with millions in their pockets or not. And also what will happen in the owner of a small business which is also operating at a loss. Then compare these two “operating at a loss” and tell me if they are even slightly comparable.

                • helenslunch@feddit.nl
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  The point is that the company has to be profitable. It’s not complicated. The point of companies is to be profitable. If they’re not profitable, they cease to exist, which isn’t good for anyone. Those are the only options they have: become profitable or cease to exist. I know you people like to think money is just conjured into existence with magic but that’s not the way anything works.

          • Sanyanov@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Piracy is a capitalism problem.

            People don’t pay what it actually costs, people pay that + the revenues the company brings home. And that’s a lot now.

            Operating at a loss is a standard practice that is not only meant to drive user adoption, but to (whoops!) remove competition with smaller bags to pay losses from. So we end up with a few services that do whatever they want.

            This is not okay.

  • OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    71
    ·
    1 year ago

    No reason to stop raising prices for any business, except for the fact that demand goes down as price goes up. People will cancel or downshift to a cheaper service.

    • joemo@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      ·
      1 year ago

      There’s a scene in Fight Club about how auto companies approach recalls, and a similar method is applied for these price hikes. The company predicts how many people will leave or change plans or whatever with their changes and they price it out so that they end up making more money.

      And for a small example let’s say you have two customers paying $10/month for a service. If the price increases by $11, and one customer leaves, you are now making $21/month from the service.

      Now it’s not as simple as that in the real world, but that’s the general idea.

      The issue here is that even if a vocal minority leave these streaming services, or social media there’s still a large amount of people putting up with their shit.

      • tony@lemmy.hoyle.me.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s literally what they teach you about basic economics at school…

        The standard graph of price increasing on one side and customer demand decreasing on the other, and how companies try to find the crossover point.

      • DogMuffins@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        Sorry mate this is not some special fight club logic. It’s not even really accounting or economics logic, it’s just kinda common sense.

        What price should I sell my lemonade for? I’ll have more customers if I sell it cheaper…

        The part which seems lost on most commenters is that these companies have huge and very sophisticated market research campaigns. They can predict with great accuracy how their demographics will respond.

        • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          The part which seems lost on most commenters is that these companies have huge and very sophisticated market research campaigns. They can predict with great accuracy how their demographics will respond.

          That’s pretty much what the above person said lol

          They have a good idea of how many people will leave before they do it.

    • Kit@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m kind of amazed how my Gen Z buddies are so adamantly against pirating. They think the cops will bust down their door, literally.

      • banananya@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        As a gen z kiddo, like half of the software on my pc and 90% of my movies are pirated lmao.

      • Kiosade@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I mean i’ve met a lot of millenials like that too. I’m not exactly sure where it stems from

      • thejml@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        A few of mine got cease and desist orders from their ISP, one got two… so that’s why they’re against it. Some now do VPN, some just hop streaming services. Some just stopped watching as much stuff because: life.

      • Syrc@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Everyone torrented in the 00’s, and Netflix was born from that.

        No way they’ll let the whole market crash before trying to get some customers back.

      • Lightor@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Lol no. That’s not how an economy works. When you sell less of a thing you then have to adjust price to make it favorable again. Companies aren’t just going to say “If we can’t charge $350 a month we might as well just turn off this massive money machine.” No, they will charge $200 and accept making less money over making no money.

        • helenslunch@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s not how an economy works.

          You’re correct. Theft has nothing to do with the economy.

          No, they will charge $200 and accept making less money

          It doesn’t matter what they charge when everyone steals it for $0.

          • Lightor@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            You’re correct. Theft has nothing to do with the economy.

            Ummm theft, aka shrink, is very much a part of any business.

            Hiring theft prevention is an entire field of work around this very concept. How can you say theft has nothing to do with the economy when there is an entire industry around theft prevention…

            It doesn’t matter what they charge when everyone steals it for $0.

            You missed the part where people stop stealing if the price is reasonable. It’s the reason why pirating went way down when Netflix first came out. People are willing to pay, not be taken advantage of. Are you not reading these comments, people saying they will pirate if there is another hike? There is clearly a line, if they cross it then they lose customers.

            • helenslunch@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              You missed the part where people stop stealing if the price is reasonable.

              LOL “reasonable” according to whom?

              God the fucking galle you must have to say “ah that’s too expensive to pay for so I’ll just steal it! And if they bring the price back down I’ll totally pay for it out of the kindness of my little heart because I’m just such an ethical person!”

              Stop lying, you’re not paying for shit.

              • Lightor@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                According to the market. That’s how reasonable prices are arrived at. It’s this little thing called an economy.

                I’m not saying stealing is OK, I’m just being realistic. If you charge $200 a month for Netflix people will steal it. You can get upset and rant all you want, that’s reality. People refuse to be charged more and more for the same thing, there is a breaking point.

                Also, it’s not stealing. This argument has been had and proved false. The large number of people who pirate content are very unlikely to have ever paid for it. It’s not stealing vs buying, it’s pirating vs never watching. The outcome of pirating or never watching is the same to the creators.

                Right now I pay for Netflix, Hulu, HBO Max and Sunday pass. I’m paying for plenty. You’re just too ruled by your emotions to have an actual conversation, so you make wild assumptions and throw insults instead.

                • helenslunch@feddit.nl
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  According to the market. That’s how reasonable prices are arrived at. It’s this little thing called an economy.

                  LOL buddy, you are bypassing the economy. You’re just stealing the content. You need to take your own advice because that is not remotely how an economy works.

                  Also, it’s not stealing.

                  My God, this is the dumbest shit and I can’t believe you morons are still peddling this.

                  The outcome of pirating or never watching is the same to the creators.

                  Except it’s not, at all. And you know it isn’t. And there wouldn’t be giant megacorporations going after pirates if it was. This is nothing but shitty mental gymnastics you use to justify being a thief.

                  You’re just too ruled by your emotions to have an actual conversation

                  There’s no conversation to be had here. You’re just off living in a fictitious reality of your own creation. Have fun with that. Bye.

  • ohlaph@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    1 year ago

    I am slowly cancelling services with each price increase. I uave cancelled Netflix and HBO. Will continue until morale improves.

  • tankplanker@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    With prices going up and likely subscribers going way down the next logical move for the Streaming Companies is to start cracking down on Piracy again as they already had a go at password sharing.

    Now I am not saying they will be successful in prosecuting those that are careful, just that there will be a few high profile cases against groups of people who aren’t using the best hygiene when it comes to piracy. Fear is their best weapon against piracy that they actually want to deploy, just make sure you do enough research to make sure you aren’t in that harvest of low hanging fruit.

  • Tattorack@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Really? No reason to stop raising prices? My Jolly Roger got something to say about that.

    Piracy has never been easier or safer or faster than it is now, and these platforms think driving people away with overpriced subscriptions for shitty content is beneficial for them?

    • Chobbes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 year ago

      Piracy isn’t easier than not bothering to cancel your subscription for most people. I’m sure they’ll lose some people, and especially the demographic here, but I don’t know about the average person.

      • Tattorack@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        And yet I see all sorts of articles saying these platforms complain that piracy is now even higher than before Netflix became a streaming service.

    • aksdb@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Piracy has never been easier or safer or faster than it is now

      What?! It was way easier and safer in the era of Napster, edonkey and emule. Easy discoverability and companies didn’t pay any attention yet. Since then it’s a cat and mouse game.

  • Devouring@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Weird… why is piracy growing then? Every reasonable person should pay $300 to watch the shows they want on the weekend… and then pay a couple more hundreds in the theater.

    • lemmington_steele@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      every dollar you raise, the fewer customers you get. the point is that you should want to raise the price whenever the relative drop in customers is less than the relative increase in price to maximise profits (where marginal cost is marginal benefit :) )

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ve no problem with paying for good services, but when I get a better service from a random pirate streaming site than I do from Amazon Prime, why would I continue paying for that?

    I’m just sick of things either being exclusive to one service even though they’re decades old, or just plain not available.

    Oh, and if I’m paying, I don’t want ads. Not ever.

    • SpaceCadet@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I’ve no problem with paying for good services

      Exactly. It used to be that netflix was all you needed to get most quality content, and it was a fair deal for customers: you pay a reasonable monthly amount, and you and your family gets convenient access to most streamable movies and TV series.

      Now that quality content is spread out and locked out over half a dozen other streaming services, and subscribing to them all is not just a hassle but also incredibly bad value compared to the original offer.

      In a healthy competitive environment, you would expect companies to counter reduced value by increasing customer value in other ways or by reducing prices, but instead we got price hikes, lots of low quality filler content, crack downs on password sharing, advertising, various unpopular UI changes and other service reductions decreasing value even further.

      To solve this, I think the content producers and streaming services should be split up, because right now they’re not really competitors in a true sence but small monopolies who each clutch the keys to their own little franchises. It should be noted for example that music streaming works a lot better: there are various competitors that each hold a viable content library on their own, so you don’t need more than one music streaming service. IMO that’s because Spotify, Tidal, YT Music, etc. are merely distributors and not the actual producers.

      • Blackmist@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, the music industry finally got their shit together and made something that was more convenient than just nicking it online. Took their sweet time over it, but I think they realised that it was taking like a minute to download a whole album by that point.

        It’s really the model of how to do it well. Very little in the way of exclusives locked to one particular service. Occasionally an artist kicks up a fuss over something and pulls all their stuff from one of them, but it’s rare enough that I don’t care.

      • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Being totally serious, you should copy and paste your comment and email it to your local US Representative.

    • jabjoe@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I have a problem paying for DRM. I want to use open source and DRM is the opposite. I like (and buy sometimes) Creative Commons music/audio-books just because it tastes better when artist isn’t supporting restricting me. Cory Doctorow is a creative worker who lives and breaths anti-DRM, if you’ve not explored this. I recommend his old talk “The Coming War on General Computation”.

    • MadBigote@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yup, came to say they should move to Plex/Jellyfish to get away from the streaming shitshow.

      • ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        Exactly. It’s funny because if one streaming company were more like Valve, they could have all of the content on one platform like Steam has with Valve. Piracy is a convenience problem, after all, not a pricing problem, and it sure as hell isn’t convenient to have to be subscribed to 5 or more different platforms just to get all the content I’d want to watch.

  • WaxedWookie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    1 year ago

    Now chart hours of content against cost across the market, and watch it go vertical. Bonus for weighting by critical rating.

    Piracy is the only reasonable choice.

  • jordanlund@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Thanks for the reminder to cancel Disney+ and HBO Max - I almost forgot! ;)

    Still have Peacock, because that’s comped through my mobile provider.

    My wife does Amazon Prime, Netflix, and Hulu. I had Prime but realized I only ever used it for free shipping, which I can get anyway by bundling my orders and setting ship dates.

    • yeehaw@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Bundling orders and set ship dates - what? This is something I don’t know about.

      • jordanlund@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        1 year ago

        Even without Prime, you can get free shipping if you spend over a certain amount.

        So instead of placing multiple small orders and paying shipping, I’ll wait until the combined dollar value qualifies for free shipping.

        Also on check out, you can specify a delivery date with free shipping.