• CosmicSploogeDrizzle@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    1 year ago

    A baby born on Dec 31st is 1 year old, and the next day would be 2 years old … A 2 day old baby would be considered 2 years old. Glad they decided that this was beyond odd.

    • dotancohen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      My daughter was born at 22:30 on December 31. In Korea she would have been considered 2 years old when she was born less than 2 hours previously.

  • HenriVolney@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Too bad they didn’t keep their very own system of measurement which is so much more convenient than the internationally recognized and simple system… Not looking in anybody’s direction

  • Augapfel@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    babies are considered a year old on the day they’re born

    Is there any useful idea behind this? That sounds completely dumb.

    • Troy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s just semantics. When you are born, you are in your first year of life, not your zeroth year of life. After a full year, you are one year old. Grammar varies from language to language, and sometimes one feels more natural.

      Imagine everyone in English said “I’m in my 32nd year” instead of “I’m 31 years old.” Now you meet a foreigner who says the opposite. Translation issues abound!

        • Troy@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          You’re absolutely right. But as most people don’t measure their age in centuries (yet), it isn’t a problem.

          I’m hoping the debate emerges when I’m in my 7th century.