Jadarrius Rose, 23, is seen on video during the July 4 traffic stop with his hands up surrendering to police before an officer deployed his canine.

A police dog mauled a Black man in Ohio during a July 4th traffic stop after he surrendered to authorities with his hands raised in the air following a “lengthy pursuit,” according to officials.

A Motor Carrier Enforcement inspector with the Ohio State Highway Patrol (OSHP) attempted to stop 23-year-old Jadarrius Rose who was driving a semi-tractor trailer because it “was missing a left rear mud flap,” according to an incident report. Rose was traveling westbound on U.S. Route 35 and failed to stop for the inspector and troopers who were called in for help.

Stop sticks were deployed twice on the vehicle before it came to a stop on U.S. Route 23.

“After several times of being ordered to exit the vehicle, the suspect exited the vehicle from the driver’s side door,” the incident report stated. “The driver was given orders to get down on the ground and the suspect would not comply.”

Rose can be seen on video released by the OSHP standing in front of troopers with his hands in the air.

An officer with the Circleville Police Department who has a K9 with him can be heard telling Rose to “go on the ground or you’re gonna get bit.” Meanwhile, a trooper with the OSHP is telling Rose to “come to me.”

It was then that the Circleville Police Department officer, identified as “R. Speakman,” deployed his K9.

[article continues]

  • Drusas@kbin.socialOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    1 year ago

    Not only did the police target this black man for essentially no reason (really? You chase a driver, which is dangerous to the entire community, because he’s missing a mud flap?), the responding officers gave mixed commands at the same time, and then assaulted him with a dog while he had already surrendered.

    Anyone want to bet that the culprit here gets a paid vacation while his department investigates and finds no wrongdoing?

    We need to redo the police system in the US from the ground up.

  • blazera@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    k9 units are medieval levels of behind the times. but toxic masculinity thinks they’re cool.

    • QHC@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      They are also worse than random chance at actually doing the one thing police claim technology can’t match: drug and bomb sniffing. Dogs just want to go take a nap or get a treat, and their handlers are cops who just think everything is suspicious so of course they get lots of “hits”.

      It’s essentially the same bullshit that hoodwinked the world with Coco the “signing” guerilla for a couple of decades.

      • HexTrace@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        The fact that handlers can fake a “hit” wherever and whenever they want is the entire point, and also the reason they resist moving over to technical solutions. Those technologies also come with logging, which is another point against them as far as cops are concerned.

        It’s always been about control and cruelty.

    • Astroturfed@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      They’re still around to use as bullshit “probable cause” to hassle and search people’s cars for drugs. Because the war on drugs was a good idea, and dogs have not repeatedly been shown to be complete bullshit. They indicate when their handler wants them to. It’s been proven so many times. Yet, it’s probable cause.

  • MsPenguinette@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    More from the article:

    “Do not release the dog with his hands up!” a trooper can be heard yelling multiple times ahead of Speakman releasing the dog.

    The video shows the dog running towards Rose, who came to his knees as Speakman released the K9.

    Video appears to show the dog biting and pulling Rose by his arm as he screams loudly.

    “Get it off!” Rose screams repeatedly.

    “Get the dog off of him!” a trooper is heard yelling.

    Other officers on the scene can be heard calling for a first aid kit.

  • admiralteal@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    It’s not clear if the officer responsible for directing the dog to attack Rose is facing any disciplinary action.

    Of course not, any disciplinary action will wait until the department’s PR department has established whether or not there is a significant media backlash. Bad publicity (potentially spurring ethical reform) is the only reason a cop ever gets disciplined, after all.

  • Proteus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    stories like these are too common. seems like the standard is for them to get a vacation when caught being cruel.

  • QHC@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Even if it was a known murderer, there is zero practical reason to engage in a projected car chase.

    Not to mention, why do we need armed militia to enforce traffic laws? you know, the thing that usually has a maximum penalty in the hundreds of dollars? These aren’t even real crimes! Somehow we figured out that parking meters don’t need guns or tasers, but why did we stop there?

    • Xeelee@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The armed militia is need to terrorize and intimidate the population. They’re doing exactly what they’re being paid for.

  • Silverseren@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Sounds like Jadarrius had a good reason to not stop when the cops tried to flag him down for nothing at all. He knew this was going to be a “driving while black” stop and his life was at high risk.

    • Drusas@kbin.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      My thought exactly. He probably didn’t stop because he knew he was targeted and was in danger. And he was right.

    • n0m4n@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      A later, follow-up news source has reported that the driver had talked to a police dispatcher and “was afraid for his life”.

      • n0m4n@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Involving others so there are witnesses may have saved his life, or at least more serious injuries. The driver is alive, so he at least accomplished that part.

  • the_thunder_god@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Once they get him stopped, get him out of the vehicle, and have his hands up, he’s surrendering. He got multiple conflicting commands…and with the presence of the dog he was rightfully concerned they were going to have it tackle him…that’s exactly what happened. So his concern about the dog probably caused him to ignore a command or two, because he was fearing the dog attacking him. Take the dog out of the equation and he probably surrenders peacefully and obeys commands. Conflicting commands and the presence of the dog are absolutely the problems here.

    They will be put on paid leave and any lawsuit filed will be thrown out because of qualified immunity…even though the dog never should have come out of the holding vehicle. Could have a case of excessive force, but I doubt it. All of it will be excused as part of the police work, even the mauling.

    • The scenario you describe, and a limitless spectrum of other possibilities that could exist during any encounter, are the source of so much frustration for me when these events come up.

      The person being interacted with could be exceptionally fearful, panicked, on drugs, drunk, having a medical event, deaf, experiencing mental health issues, severely autistic, or just stupid.

      YET that person, who could be ANY of those things or more, becomes a justified target for violence the moment they fail to comply with an order that they may not be capable of understanding, or may be too deep into their own circumstances to understand or even process.

      Meanwhile, the police they interact with who are (presumably, ostensibly) sober, well trained, mentally well, have backup available, and have a number of different options available to them, will always get a free pass for taking the opportunity to deploy that violence until and unless there’s enough public outcry to force some action, and sometimes not even then.

      How does that not strike anyone who reads it as an unacceptable framework for policing?

  • FuzzyDoublePumper@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    He was missing a mud flap. Certainly pulling guns and releasing dogs was required. Couldn’t they just send his employer a ticket or call that “how’s my driving?” number on the truck?