• schnapsidee@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Decisions like this just prove how massive the market for a self-hostable alternative is. They’re not banning it because it’s a bad tool, they’re banning it because they’re concerned about what happens to the source code their engineers paste into it.

    There are already a bunch of OSS attempts, and it likely won’t take long until we have something of comparable quality to ChatGPT is available for companies to host on their own hardware.

  • MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    How to neuter your own ability to compete: ban your workers from using the latest tool for boosting employee performance.

      • animist@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Better stop using xerox machines to make copies and write everything out by hand

    • Ulu-Mulu-no-die@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Leaking industry secrets is a much bigger concern that boosting productivity a little bit.

      We’re talking about very specialized engineering work, it’s not something you can totally rely on a bot to do, though it might help sometimes, it’s fully understandable for specialized companies to want to ban GPT internally, until there’s a way for them to host a totally internal one.